Precious Metals Forum

Go Back   Precious Metals Forum > Precious Metals and Economic News > Gold Bug

Like Tree15Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-13-2019, 10:09 AM   #41
Golden Cockroach
 
PMBug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: In Scrooge McDuck's vault
Posts: 6,953
Liked: 2433 times
Basel III is supposed to come into effect at the end of this month. I'm still seeing mixed reporting out there on what it means for banks and gold.
__________________
The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step. - Lao Tzu

Important stuff: PMBug 101 * Forum Guidelines * Support PMBug
PMBug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2019, 06:53 PM   #42
Yellow Jacket
 
rblong2us's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: off world
Posts: 1,945
Liked: 865 times
This is an old thread and I had pretty much forgotten about Basel3
I thought the TBTF banks had everything they needed )-:

So what does the mixed reporting suggest might happen Bug ?

and in reply to your previous post on this thread -

Quote :
So, it seems that we understood it backwards - gold isn't going to be valued at 85%, it's going to be valued at 15%. 85% is the value of cash they need to hold in reserve to cover the value of the gold (in case the market/price crashed).
A great way to get gold holders to give up on the idea and buy it up at a sale price
They clearly will do pretty nasty and desperate things to obtain enough gold to keep the show on the road ?
__________________
if it cant be done with a digger .... it cant be done
rblong2us is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2019, 08:14 AM   #43
Golden Cockroach
 
PMBug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: In Scrooge McDuck's vault
Posts: 6,953
Liked: 2433 times
Originally Posted by rblong2us View Post:
...
So what does the mixed reporting suggest might happen Bug ?
...
Some suggest it means banks will be increasing gold holdings as it's a now a better asset. Others, as you quoted, suggest it's actually now a worse asset and will lead to banks selling off gold holdings.

I wish I could find a definitive source explaining the situation in clear language.
__________________
The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step. - Lao Tzu

Important stuff: PMBug 101 * Forum Guidelines * Support PMBug
PMBug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2019, 07:23 AM   #44
Golden Cockroach
 
PMBug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: In Scrooge McDuck's vault
Posts: 6,953
Liked: 2433 times
Here's another report on Basel III written by someone who sounds a lot like a gold bug, but which also describes the 85% haircut as requiring banks to hold more cash collateral for gold holdings:

http://bmg-group.com/gold-zero-risk-monetary-asset/

The author briefly mentions the NSFR issue then talks about how gold qualifies as “a 0% risk weighting for risk-based capital purposes.” It doesn't really explain what that means though.
__________________
The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step. - Lao Tzu

Important stuff: PMBug 101 * Forum Guidelines * Support PMBug
PMBug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2019, 03:47 AM   #45
Yellow Jacket
 
rblong2us's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: off world
Posts: 1,945
Liked: 865 times
And heres one from Russia where they reckon gold is now a tier 1 asset and will be fully counted ....... a revolution in fact (-;

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-...ops+to+zero%29
__________________
if it cant be done with a digger .... it cant be done
rblong2us is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2019, 07:07 AM   #46
Golden Cockroach
 
PMBug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: In Scrooge McDuck's vault
Posts: 6,953
Liked: 2433 times
Yeah, I'm not sure that author had all his facts straight. Initial reporting on Basel III (as per the OP of this thread) were indicating a tier 1 asset with 100% valuation as he mentions, but that changed.
__________________
The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step. - Lao Tzu

Important stuff: PMBug 101 * Forum Guidelines * Support PMBug
PMBug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2019, 03:58 AM   #47
Yellow Jacket
 
rblong2us's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: off world
Posts: 1,945
Liked: 865 times
Ok so if Basel III came into effect 11 days ago and the price of gold has moved $10 and is broadly where it was a month ago, what might we conclude from this ?
__________________
if it cant be done with a digger .... it cant be done
rblong2us is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2019, 06:55 AM   #48
Golden Cockroach
 
PMBug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: In Scrooge McDuck's vault
Posts: 6,953
Liked: 2433 times
Well, if the gold price was actually based upon the physical market, we might be able to draw a conclusion. But it's not, so ... ???
__________________
The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step. - Lao Tzu

Important stuff: PMBug 101 * Forum Guidelines * Support PMBug
PMBug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2019, 10:07 AM   #49
Big-eyed bug
 
Unobtanium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 451
Liked: 344 times
But it's not, so .......

so the price of gold will not significantly increase until either:

1) Gold becomes scarce because the physical market gets very tight; and maybe Basel III has an impact on that due to heavy accumulation by central banks, or

2) TPTB want it to increase, and they might want it to increase now that gold has Tier1 status via Basel III.

Edit:
3) The price of oil rises significantly again for a sustained period.
rblong2us likes this.

Last edited by Unobtanium; 04-11-2019 at 05:35 PM.
Unobtanium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2019, 06:28 AM   #50
Yellow Jacket
 
rblong2us's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: off world
Posts: 1,945
Liked: 865 times
So we can conclude that Basel III has no effect on POG ?

why would TPTB want an increase in POG if they have to have cash deposits to 85% of its value

and how might they respond if POG were to rise rapidly ?

The cash deposit required to back gold holdings seems like a great way to suppress price )-:
PMBug likes this.
__________________
if it cant be done with a digger .... it cant be done
rblong2us is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2019, 07:03 AM   #51
Golden Cockroach
 
PMBug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: In Scrooge McDuck's vault
Posts: 6,953
Liked: 2433 times
Originally Posted by rblong2us View Post:
...
The cash deposit required to back gold holdings seems like a great way* to suppress price )-:
*motivation
__________________
The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step. - Lao Tzu

Important stuff: PMBug 101 * Forum Guidelines * Support PMBug
PMBug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2019, 08:53 AM   #52
Golden Cockroach
 
PMBug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: In Scrooge McDuck's vault
Posts: 6,953
Liked: 2433 times
Found this report from late January:
Quote :
European finance ministers have rejected a proposal to ease new liquidity rules for banks trading gold, the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) said.

The industry says the planned rules could force some players out of the market. Due to take effect in the European Union around 2022, they form part of regulations known as Basel III designed to make banks more stable and prevent a repeat of the financial crisis a decade ago.

The rules treat physically traded gold like any other commodity, requiring banks to hold more cash to match their gold exposure as a buffer against adverse price moves.

The LBMA says they are unnecessary, costly and would disrupt London’s bullion clearing system, which settles gold transactions worth around $23 billion a day.

EU finance ministers rejected a proposal by the European Parliament to lower the percentage used to calculate the liquidity buffer that banks must hold to 50 percent from 85 percent.

Instead, the European Banking Authority (EBA) will examine whether to lower the percentage or exempt precious metals from the buffer, known as the net stable funding ratio (NSFR), the LBMA and the European Council said.

“We are still optimistic,” said the LBMA’s general counsel, Sakhila Mirza. “While we were hoping for that 50 percent, ultimately our aim has always been getting an exemption.”

The LBMA, whose members include major gold refiners and bullion-trading banks, says gold is liquid enough not to need an additional liquidity buffer for clearing and settlement and short-term transactions.

It says the rules could mean a number of banks stop trading or settling gold, curtailing market liquidity. London is one of the world’s biggest bullion markets.

Mirza said the review was likely to last two years. The EBA will then make recommendations which would have to be approved by the European Commission, parliament and council of ministers.

She said the LBMA was preparing to lobby the EBA and that data the LBMA began publishing last year showing for the first time how much gold and silver trades in London each day would help convince the EBA of the need for an exemption.

While Britain plans to leave the European Union this year, the EU’s approach is likely to inform how Britain applies the Basel III requirements.

A European Council official said the EBA had been tasked with reviewing the NSFR requirements for precious metals and did not comment further.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-g...-idUSKCN1PI12A
__________________
The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step. - Lao Tzu

Important stuff: PMBug 101 * Forum Guidelines * Support PMBug
PMBug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2019, 04:49 AM   #53
Yellow Jacket
 
rblong2us's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: off world
Posts: 1,945
Liked: 865 times
going back to this -
Quote :
So, it seems that we understood it backwards - gold isn't going to be valued at 85%, it's going to be valued at 15%. 85% is the value of cash they need to hold in reserve to cover the value of the gold (in case the market/price crashed).
I find myself pondering if it doesnt mean that COMEX aqnd other futures markets would be obliged to hold 15% of the paper contracts as actual metal ?

This would be an interesting shift from the approx 0.5% they currently seem to hold.
__________________
if it cant be done with a digger .... it cant be done
rblong2us is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2019, 07:14 AM   #54
Golden Cockroach
 
PMBug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: In Scrooge McDuck's vault
Posts: 6,953
Liked: 2433 times
I'm pretty sure the Basel III is a standard for the banking industry and doesn't have any bearing on the commodity exchanges. As the latest article above shows, the LBMA was concerned about how it will affects banks trading metals. It could potentially cause a liquidity crisis on the exchanges if the banks just close down their metal trading desks.

Should this happen, I suppose we might finally see a violent event where the futures/paper market no longer sets the price for the physical metal.
__________________
The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step. - Lao Tzu

Important stuff: PMBug 101 * Forum Guidelines * Support PMBug
PMBug is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
6/12/12 - Turkey just monetized gold - Tier 1 asset DSAbug Gold Bug 2 06-12-2012 10:48 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® from Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Content of PMBug.com copyright © 2011 - 2019 Measuring Up. All Rights Reserved.