Precious Metals Forum

Go Back   Precious Metals Forum > Precious Metals and Economic News > PM Bug

Like Tree99Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-11-2013, 09:21 PM   #81
Big-eyed bug
 
Unobtanium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 451
Liked: 344 times
Originally Posted by bushi View Post:
fantastic graph! I presume, the width of each bar represents producer's share in the global production?
It was not explained in the article, but that was my conclusion too.
Unobtanium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2013, 11:25 AM   #82
Super Moderator
 
benjamen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Migratory
Posts: 1,617
Liked: 683 times
Problems for the South African mining companies continue:
http://www.24hgold.com/english/news-...r=Chris+Powell

"Amcu and the National Union of Mineworkers have tabled wage increase demands for entry-level workers of between 100% and 60% of prevailing salaries."

"The gold price is now R412,200/kg and closer to 60% of mines are in a loss-making or marginal position."

"Using the new cost reporting metrics proposed by the World Gold Council last month, the average all-in cost for the world's top five global gold mining companies was $1,467/oz in the first quarter of this year"

"By next year, about half of global production will need a break-even gold price of $2,400/oz, using a 10% year-on-year mining inflation assumption, he said."


"Chamber senior executive Roger Baxter has said that between 2007 and 2012 there was a 238% increase in electricity prices for mining companies and a 12%-a-year rise in the annual remuneration paid per worker, roughly five percentage points higher than producer inflation."

"With declining production there is less gold to pay for fixed costs. Cash costs have increased by 23% in the past five years for South African gold mining companies, he said."
Unobtanium, ancona and Unbeatable like this.
__________________
I drive men mad
For love of me,
Easily beaten,
Never free.

PMBug 101 *** Forum Rules
benjamen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2013, 12:05 PM   #83
Yellow Jacket
 
ancona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Waaay south
Posts: 3,370
Liked: 2046 times
Just like unions everywhere, they are killing the host. I would think that closing down mines, when it happens, will have a serious and material impact on metals prices as product disappears from the marketplace. while I understand the need for unions, too many times they use their clout to demand outsized pay and benefits, which not only results in higher prices for finished material/products, but disrupts local economies where local wages for non-union work are far less than union wages.
__________________
All things being equal, the simplest answer is quite often the correct answer - Occam
ancona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2013, 09:30 AM   #84
Big-eyed bug
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 416
Liked: 249 times
Another 5%+ drop in production...

Quote :
AngloGold Ashanti, the world’s third biggest gold producer, said it would produce 4m to 4.1m ounces of gold this year, rather than the 4.1m to 4.4m ounces previously planned, in response to the fall in its product’s price
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/c...ritedowns.html

.
ancona likes this.
Unbeatable is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2013, 06:43 PM   #85
Big-eyed bug
 
Unobtanium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 451
Liked: 344 times
We continue to see more and more information and news in the precious metals community that paint the picture of the POG and POS right now as akin to dragging a beach ball further and further underwater. Something has to give...


From Mark Mahaffey, co-founder of the London-based Hinde Capital:

http://bullmarketthinking.com/hinde-...-the-extremes/

Quote :
When asked about the prospect of gold mining stocks at this time, Mark commented that,

“Companies should fail by the hundreds and production will fall dramatically unless the gold price improves quickly…our analysis…is the price of gold that will produce a zero number in the current free cash flow column for the whole industry (i.e. breakeven, cash neutrality)…it’s $1750 an ounce.

Every single [expense] of a mining company needs to be taken into account [and] divided by the amount of ounces you’re digging out of the ground…oil is at $109 and climbing, labor unions are demanding more money and the cost of regulation keeps going up.

[So] today with gold trading at $1300 an ounce and production at $1750 and climbing, gold is trading at 75% of its production cost—and that has never happened before.

When gold traded to $800 an ounce in 1980, the cost of extraction was $100 an ounce. So gold traded eight times its production costs. Now that’s a bubble.
DSAbug, ancona and rblong2us like this.
Unobtanium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2013, 09:51 PM   #86
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,059
Liked: 459 times
jeez.. the cost of production isn't close to $1750 so i have no idea where he's pulling that number. I look at my sheet of JUNIORS and I see very few over 1100. I have names with 400 per ounce production cost as well.

I think these guys are seeing that the miners are beaten up and are trying to explain it. They are probably upside down on his gold/silver investments and is fishing for a bullish catalyst. Since everyone hates gold miners, they are easy to pick on right now. IMHO they are being way too doomsday about their prospects. Since 1900, the gold miners have been this oversold 4 times. Those were lows, not the beginning of a decline.
benjamen likes this.
__________________
"A little more persistence, a little more effort, and what seemed hopeless failure may turn to glorious success.: - Elbert Hubbard
DSAbug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2013, 09:54 PM   #87
Big-eyed bug
 
Unobtanium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 451
Liked: 344 times
Originally Posted by DSAbug View Post:
jeez.. the cost of production isn't close to $1750 so i have no idea where he's pulling that number. I look at my sheet of JUNIORS and I see very few over 1100. I have names with 400 per ounce production cost as well.

I think these guys are seeing that the miners are beaten up and are trying to explain it. They are probably upside down on his gold/silver investments and is fishing for a bullish catalyst. Since everyone hates gold miners, they are easy to pick on right now. IMHO they are being way too doomsday about their prospects. Since 1900, the gold miners have been this oversold 4 times. Those were lows, not the beginning of a decline.
Yes, I thought 1750 was high too, but the interesting point that I got out of this was the contrast in the mining cost vs POG around 1980 vs that same ratio today.
DSAbug likes this.
Unobtanium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2013, 09:59 PM   #88
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,059
Liked: 459 times
Originally Posted by Unobtanium View Post:
Yes, I thought 1750 was high too, but the interesting point that I got out of this was the contrast in the mining cost vs POG around 1980 vs that same ratio today.
There is no fever like gold fever.

__________________
"A little more persistence, a little more effort, and what seemed hopeless failure may turn to glorious success.: - Elbert Hubbard
DSAbug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2013, 08:08 AM   #89
Super Moderator
 
benjamen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Migratory
Posts: 1,617
Liked: 683 times
Originally Posted by DSAbug View Post:
jeez.. the cost of production isn't close to $1750 so i have no idea where he's pulling that number. I look at my sheet of JUNIORS and I see very few over 1100. I have names with 400 per ounce production cost as well.

I think these guys are seeing that the miners are beaten up and are trying to explain it. They are probably upside down on his gold/silver investments and is fishing for a bullish catalyst. Since everyone hates gold miners, they are easy to pick on right now. IMHO they are being way too doomsday about their prospects. Since 1900, the gold miners have been this oversold 4 times. Those were lows, not the beginning of a decline.
I agree that $1750 is a tad high.

From earlier in this thread:
http://www.pmbug.com/forum/f13/miner...html#post23182
"Using the new cost reporting metrics proposed by the World Gold Council last month, the average all-in cost for the world's top five global gold mining companies was $1,467/oz in the first quarter of this year"

However, as costs are going up at around 10% a year, it may not take long to hit that number.
__________________
I drive men mad
For love of me,
Easily beaten,
Never free.

PMBug 101 *** Forum Rules
benjamen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2013, 02:05 PM   #90
Golden Cockroach
 
PMBug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: In Scrooge McDuck's vault
Posts: 6,978
Liked: 2438 times
Quote :
US gold miner Newmont has made heavy write-offs against its Australian mines - Boddington and Tanami - totalling $US1.5 billion ($1.62 billion) following the slump in the gold price.

The group is in the process of cutting its global workforce by a third as it seeks to ensure it can survive with the downturn.
...
http://www.smh.com.au/business/minin...726-2qpcf.html

Quote :
Goldcorp Inc. reported an enormous net loss of US$1.93-billion in the second quarter after taking a big writedown on the Penasquito mine in Mexico.
...
The US$1.96-billion writedown reflects the exploration potential of Penasquito, Vancouver-based Goldcorp said. It is the company’s first major impairment charge this year, as it previously avoided the writedowns that have plagued competitors like Barrick Gold Corp. and Kinross Gold Corp.

“Penasquito continues to possess strong exploration upside, but due to lower metals prices, the current in situ market value of exploration potential has decreased significantly,” chief executive Chuck Jeannes said in a statement.
...
http://www.theprovince.com/business/...400/story.html

Quote :
Goldcorp And Why Gold Miners Are Getting Crushed: Massive Cost Inflation, Dropping Prices

...
Goldcorp expects total cash costs of $1,000 to $1,100 per ounce on an all-in sustaining cost basis.
...
http://www.forbes.com/sites/afonteve...alling-prices/
__________________
The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step. - Lao Tzu

Important stuff: PMBug 101 * Forum Guidelines * Support PMBug
PMBug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2013, 09:26 AM   #91
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,059
Liked: 459 times
This is why i hate the majors.. You have a 2 year correction and then they decide to cut production. No vision.
__________________
"A little more persistence, a little more effort, and what seemed hopeless failure may turn to glorious success.: - Elbert Hubbard
DSAbug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2013, 08:56 AM   #92
Big-eyed bug
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 416
Liked: 249 times
World's largest gold miner looking to cut up to 25% of Gold production.


Quote :
Mines with all-in costs above $1,000 an ounce contribute about 25 per cent of Barrick’s expected 2013 gold production. Mr. Sokalsky said he is “prepared to make the tough decisions. Our goal is to significantly reduce the percentage of mines in our portfolio that are above $1,000 per ounce and we're working on the plans to do that.”
Quote :
..such as Porgera, its major Australian project, which posted an all-in sustaining cost of $1,306 per ounce in the second quarter. (All-in sustaining costs include labour, administrative fees and exploration expenses, among others.) Barrick’s share of African Barrick Gold assets, which the company spun off in 2010, also weighs on profitability with all-in sustaining costs of $1,550 to $1,600 per ounce.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/repor...ticle13544986/
Unobtanium likes this.
Unbeatable is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2013, 09:14 AM   #93
Yellow Jacket
 
ancona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Waaay south
Posts: 3,370
Liked: 2046 times
I think it's awesome! The way I see it, if these guys close down enough production to force prices up, it will take quite some time to bring the mothballed mines back up to speed, helping to maintain any upward momentum given to phyz as a result of falling production. As it is, mines all over Africa are in turmoil over labor protests and strikes. There is word of work slow-downs as a protest means at mines in South Africa as well, which hurts even more than a strike since you are getting no-low production but are still paying all of the operating costs and labor.

Obviously, there will be pain for those who hold shares in these companies, but they have no choice but to cut off those mines that are operating above the spot price of metal.
Unobtanium likes this.
__________________
All things being equal, the simplest answer is quite often the correct answer - Occam

Last edited by ancona; 08-02-2013 at 01:31 PM.
ancona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2013, 09:36 AM   #94
Ground Beetle
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 501
Liked: 304 times
Originally Posted by ancona View Post:
Obviously, there will be pain for those who hold shares in these companies, but they have no choice but to cut off those mines that are operating above the spot price of metal.
Pain would be an understatement. More like cardiac arrest
ancona likes this.
Aubuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2013, 09:42 AM   #95
Yellow Jacket
 
ancona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Waaay south
Posts: 3,370
Liked: 2046 times
Aubuy,
I don't wish pain on anyone, but it's time for metals to get fucking real already. This paper distortion has gone on for far, far too long. The futures market used to be a place for legitimate hedging and price discovery, but with the advent of computers and "bank holding companies" it has become a mafia operated rigged casino, where the only winners are the banks and those who hit it by complete accident, because I can assure you that "they" don't want any winners besides themselves.

Farmers used to be able to protect themselves with futures, but can no longer trust that they won't get "Corzined" so they have backed way, way off. This can only hurt the market because as a result, the only real players are purely speculating and doing so with someone else's money.
__________________
All things being equal, the simplest answer is quite often the correct answer - Occam

Last edited by ancona; 08-02-2013 at 01:30 PM.
ancona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2013, 01:40 AM   #96
Predaceous stink bug
 
Potemkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 220
Liked: 31 times
...I guess Rickards was right about gold price levels above 3,000 $.
Potemkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2013, 05:00 PM   #97
Big-eyed bug
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 416
Liked: 249 times
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/...97L0BA20130822

They've been talking about striking for a while, finally looks like they might do it. (South Africa)

Quote :
National Union of Mineworkers (NUM) spokesman Lesiba Seshoka said the union would be consulting its gold industry members over strike action in the next few days.

"The earliest we will issue companies with notice of the strike is Monday next week," he said.

With such notice normally being given 48 hours in advance of any action, this meant that a stoppage in the gold industry, which is the country's biggest export earner, could start on Wednesday.
Unbeatable is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2013, 07:03 PM   #98
Big-eyed bug
 
Unobtanium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 451
Liked: 344 times
Median grade of the world's top 10 gold operations. Since 1998, gold grades of the world's top ten operations have fallen from 4.6 g/t gold in 1998 to 1.1 g/t gold in 2012:

Unbeatable likes this.
Unobtanium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2013, 08:23 AM   #99
Golden Cockroach
 
PMBug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: In Scrooge McDuck's vault
Posts: 6,978
Liked: 2438 times
Quote :
The search is on for profitable precious metals operators - Mills

The stark reality for gold miners (and their investors) is that the capital costs of construction (Capex) and the daily cost of operations (Opex) have escalated significantly.

...
A complete breakdown of costs, an “all-in” cost figure, courtesy of CIBC, shows cash operating costs pegged at $700 an ounce. Sustaining capital, construction capital, discovery costs and overhead at $600. Add in $200 for taxes and you get US$1500.00 as the replacement cost for an ounce of gold.

Scotiabank calculates “full cost reporting” (all-in cost plus development capital), at US$1,458 per gold oz for the companies it covers.

“Complete cost reporting” is full cost plus corporate taxes, it’s forecast for 2013 at an average of US$1,690 per oz. gold.

Dundee Capital Markets reported that the average all-in cash cost in Dundee’s silver equities coverage universe was $22.96 per ounce during the second quarter. Dundee’s all-in cash cost calculation includes: site operating costs, exploration, corporate G&A, interest costs, royalties, taxes and sustaining capital.

Using the all-in figure provides a more accurate and definitive picture of actual mining cost and profit.

Below is a graph and a snippet from an excellent interview Joachim Berlenbach did with The Gold Report…


...
More: http://www.mineweb.com/mineweb/conte...2328&sn=Detail
Unobtanium likes this.
__________________
The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step. - Lao Tzu

Important stuff: PMBug 101 * Forum Guidelines * Support PMBug
PMBug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2013, 10:00 AM   #100
Golden Cockroach
 
PMBug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: In Scrooge McDuck's vault
Posts: 6,978
Liked: 2438 times
Quote :
... We now have 109 mining companies in our ‘club list’ whose share price has fallen by 90% or more since the heady days of 2010/2011 when the gold mining conferences were standing room only.

... any stock that is down more than 90% is most probably going to be down 100% soon enough and turning the lights off. ...

... The reason why mining companies are falling by 70-100% in the hundreds now is very simple. In our analysis, it costs over $1750 to mine an ounce of gold if you add in all the costs of running a mining company, not the published cash costs or the all in sustaining costs. The mining industry can argue till they are blue in the face that their costs are $800 or $1200/ ounce but if you only produce negative cash flow (that’s a LOSS to the non-analysts) when gold is below $1750, then it’s pretty clear in my books what is happening. ...
More: http://www.hindecapital.com/blog/the...to-go-to-zero/
__________________
The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step. - Lao Tzu

Important stuff: PMBug 101 * Forum Guidelines * Support PMBug
PMBug is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dr Copper building potential head and shoulders formation swissaustrian STS 23 04-18-2013 07:48 AM
The price of dollars in gold Unobtanium PM Bug 2 05-07-2012 07:11 AM
Junior miners priced for $400 gold, Got Gold Report's Arensberg writes swissaustrian Mining 1 11-29-2011 02:18 PM
Tomorrow's Monster Outperformers: Miners of Gold and Silver PMBug Mining 1 11-10-2011 07:49 AM
Which Gold Miners Have Largest Upside? DSAbug Mining 0 11-03-2011 11:11 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® from Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Content of PMBug.com copyright © 2011 - 2019 Measuring Up. All Rights Reserved.