Precious Metals Forum

Go Back   Precious Metals Forum > Bunker Talk > STS

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By PMBug

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-19-2019, 07:41 AM   #1
Golden Cockroach
 
PMBug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: In Scrooge McDuck's vault
Posts: 7,027
Liked: 2449 times
GOA funds challenge to NFA with SCOTUS

No word if SCOTUS will hear the case, but there is always a chance...

Quote :
(January 14, 2019) — Gun Owners of America (GOA) and its litigating arm, Gun Owners Foundation (GOF), today continued their defense of Jeremy Kettler, a disabled combat veteran, against a conviction for violating the National Firearms Act.

The Obama Justice Department brought criminal felony charges against Jeremy for illegally possessing an unregistered firearm suppressor under the authority of the Kansas “Second Amendment Protection Act.”

The Kansas statute declares that any suppressor manufactured, possessed, and used within the borders of Kansas is exempt from federal law. Relying on that Kansas law, in 2014 Jeremy purchased a suppressor from a local military surplus store, but did not register it with ATF pursuant to the National Firearms Act (NFA).

Believing he was following the law, Jeremy posted a video about his new suppressor on Facebook, and ATF swooped in. Rather than simply requiring Jeremy to register his suppressor, the feds instead chose felony prosecution — to make an example of Jeremy, and to intimidate all who resist federal power over guns. Jeremy was indicted, and convicted of possessing an unregistered silencer, and now this veteran is a federal felon.

GOA and GOF have stood with Jeremy, both in his appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, and now in the U.S. Supreme Court.

Today GOA and GOF lawyers, representing Jeremy, filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court, asking the Court to hear Jeremy’s case. The petition challenges the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, which rejected Jeremy’s appeal from the district court.

Jeremy’s petition first challenges the legitimacy of the National Firearms Act, which was passed in 1934, and thereafter upheld by the Supreme Court in 1937 under the constitutional power of Congress to “lay and collect taxes.” The petition argues that the NFA as it exists today no longer can be justified as a so-called “tax.”

In fact, each of the reasons the Supreme Court gave in 1937, finding it to be a tax, no longer apply today, 82 years later. Rather, the NFA has become what Justice Frankfurter once described as regulation “wrapped … in the verbal cellophane of a revenue measure” — an unabashed gun control regulatory scheme, designed not to raise revenue for the federal government, but instead to keep NFA items out of the hands of Americans.

Next, Jeremy’s petition challenges the Tenth Circuit’s absurd holding that the Second Amendment applies only to “bearable arms” — but not firearm accessories, such as suppressors. The petition points out that the Second, Third, Seventh, and Ninth Circuits all have concluded that the Second Amendment extends beyond actual firearms to ammunition, magazines, the ability to purchase firearms in gun stores, and the right to practice at shooting ranges.

Finally, Jeremy’s petition argues that, if the Supreme Court continues to uphold the NFA as a “tax,” then it is allowing Congress to impose a tax on a constitutionally-protected right — something which the Supreme Court has long said to be unconstitutional.
...
https://gunowners.org/gun-owners-of-...supreme-court/
11C1P likes this.
__________________
The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step. - Lao Tzu

Important stuff: PMBug 101 * Forum Guidelines * Support PMBug
PMBug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2019, 07:42 PM   #2
Ground Beetle
 
11C1P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 961
Liked: 504 times
.

There's 2 other aspects of those laws passed & upheld by the SCOTUS of the 30's that piss me off & that's #1 that the justices were told by the govt. that machine guns were not in common use by the military, therefore the militia didn't "need" them either. While the main battle rifle was switching from a bolt action to a semi-auto & so full auto was not the standard issue battle rifle, full auto (mainly crew served weapons) was in fairly common use and had been since WWI, but the 2nd amendment doesn't say that it doesn't apply to crew served weapons, in fact cannons were the main thing the Brit's hoped to capture when they went poking around Lexington & Concorde back in 1775. Certainly since the mid 1950's full auto has been standard issue to those in the military whether it was the M-14, M-16, or M-4. So that alone should mean we are allowed to own them.

The 2nd is that in the U.S. Vs. Miller case, Miller died before it got heard by the SCOTUS & his lawyer didn't bother to show up & of course the NRA supported the law as it has supported every law banning full auto. So the show was over before it even started as far as getting a legitimate defense of our 2A rights.

I don't know what will happen now, if Darth Bader Ginsburg shows up, I think it's 5-4 against the second amendment. If she doesn't show, it's probably 4-4, which means the lower court rulings stand. I really hope I'm wrong, but I'm not getting my hopes up.

It's also funny that just days before congress was getting ready to bring up the hearing protection act bill that would remove or at least ease restrictions on silencers, a democrat shoots into a crowd in Vegas with what were allegedly AR's equipped with bump stocks, which most people I've known that had them & most I've talked to on the net don't work that great, but this guys worked flawlessly for an hour or more? Also they sounded to me & many vets I've spoken to, just like an M249 SAW, which is full auto & can be fed either via belt or magazine. Then they were all too busy talking about banning bump stocks to pass the hearing protection act. Of course when bump stock ban didn't get passed, good ol' gun grabby trump just decided to ban them all by himself.

.

Last edited by 11C1P; 02-19-2019 at 08:54 PM.
11C1P is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
cabela took TARP funds...wow Penn STS 0 10-19-2015 02:33 PM
Trader Dan: Hedge funds buying gold again PMBug Gold Bug 1 01-20-2015 08:20 AM
A COMEX Challenge! DoChenRollingBearing Gold Bug 7 06-04-2013 08:19 PM
Monkeying with Money Market Funds PMBug Fiat Ponzi 6 07-23-2012 12:18 PM
Open Challenge To All PM CEOs PMBug Mining 0 07-19-2012 08:23 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® from Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Content of PMBug.com copyright © 2011 - 2019 Measuring Up. All Rights Reserved.