Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.
Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!
My guess is this will be a double helping of nothing burger. COMEX has cash settlement available to them and as if that wasn't enough, LBMA already showed what can be done when they just stepped in and cancelled contracts in the nickel market.Silver: 5 days to go.The fuse is lit. Silver is tightening. Silver is draining from CME warehouses.
The amount of Registered (i.e. deliverable) silver held in CME warehouses is currently around 88 million ounces. Yet the March open interest is the equivalent of 239 million ounces — nearly three times the available supply.
Nobody knows exactly how many of those longs intend to close their position before the first delivery date. That uncertainty is the shorts' problem. If too many longs stand for delivery, the shorts will be squeezed and the silver price could explode upwards.
Thursday 26th February — First Position Date
This is the last day for longs who do not want to take physical delivery to close or roll their March contracts. From this date onward, clearing firms require that any remaining long positions are held by parties with both the cash and the infrastructure to accept delivery. Speculators and funds who do not want silver must be out by this date.
Friday 27th February — First Notice Day
This is the first day a short can formally notify the exchange of their intention to deliver physical silver. The exchange then assigns that notice to a long. Critically, it is the SHORT — not the long — who initiates delivery. The long who is still open on this date simply receives whatever notice the exchange assigns to them, with no say in the timing.
Once a long receives a delivery notice, they cannot easily exit. They are obligated to take and pay for the physical silver. That is why any long who does not want the metal must be out of the market before this date.
Given the current shortage of registered silver relative to open contracts, it is the naked shorts — those without physical silver — who are in the most precarious position.
If a significant number of March contracts remain open after First Delivery Day (2nd March), we could see an explosive move in the silver price.
MAKING A VIDEO LIKE THIS INVOLVES MANY HOURS OF WORK. EQUIPMENT IS EXPENSIVE TOO.
Support the Channel & Useful Resources
If you find these videos helpful and would like to support the channel, you can do so by using the affiliate links below.There is no extra cost to you, and it helps me continue producing independent, experience‑based investment content.
Michael Lynch said:With just 4 days to last notice on the February gold contract, remaining open interest is 4,366 (436,600 oz or 13.5 tonne). This is 24x the average OI at this point in the delivery cycle and more than 2x greater than any prior contract.
February OI is greater than the upcoming March contract! That's probably never happened before.
This short probably held these contracts since first notice day. I'm saying that because OI has been flat for weeks. I've learned that profile is the signature of a naked short. See the plots below.
What's this mean? It could be that this short hasn't yet delivered because he was hoping to close the position. If so, he's now trapped as liquidity this late in the contract is punk. Friday's volume was 134.
Or, it could mean that he's a naked short ... doesn't have metal to deliver. In that case, he's going to have to find someone to bail him out.
I've seen this pattern several times over the years. In those scenarios either BofA or Citibank issued delivery notices in the final days and that is a WTF moment.
My interpretation of those events is that the naked short does an off-exchange deal with one of those 2 banks. This is anomalous because banks nearly always deliver in the first days following first notice.
Why should the banks bail out the short? I'm sure they pick up some fiat for their trouble.
The take away is ... the physical market is tight and trading during the delivery period may be influenced by those without physical gold.
If you follow "Q" you know that everything Trump is doing is legal.
I'm completely confused on the Mexico situation. If there is supply disruptions than AG,Au should be going higher and miners should be tanking. The opposite is happening though.
Kobeissi Letter said:Indian investors are rushing into gold at an unprecedented pace:
Gold ETF inflows in India are up to ~250 billion rupees, an all-time high.
As a result, inflows into gold funds have surpassed equity mutual fund inflows for the first time.
This comes as gold ETF inflows have risen more than +900% since July.
Over the same period, equity fund inflows have declined -170 billion rupees.
As the world's 2nd-largest gold consumer and one of its biggest importers, India's shift toward gold ETFs marks a fundamental change in how its investors are allocating their capital.
Indian retail investors are choosing gold over equities.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?