Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.
Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!
How much you want to bet they are going to house these people in an area where a large amount of mining used to be conducted? The gypsy population in Europe has basically been rounded up and "placed" in old mining areas where the land is contaminated. Not just the water but the air they breathe is toxic enough to cause cancer and major birth defects. This is covert "social cleansing".
Another interpretation might be that such locations are the only places where the locals will not kick back and object ?
I see a lot of caravan parks and traveller type sites located beside motorways and trunk roads.
I think I would prefer to be at an old mining site, getting my food and water shipped in, to continuously breathing the fumes of part burnt hydrocarbons.
Another interpretation might be that such locations are the only places where the locals will not kick back and object ?
I see a lot of caravan parks and traveller type sites located beside motorways and trunk roads.
I think I would prefer to be at an old mining site, getting my food and water shipped in, to continuously breathing the fumes of part burnt hydrocarbons.
They think the raw mercury they are using on "gold fever" on tv is awesome.
Nah.. this is the way Europe has developed to kill off the gypsy population. For the general public it's.. To the people that work in the embassies it's out in the open. They openly admit to poisoning people and their children.
... Of course it does. They would be far away from me, so I wouldn't have a problem at all. And they would be free to live the life they crave for, without being disturbed by pesky picky neighbors, like myself (or other normal people). Just make sure, they are not getting any unearned public money, so there would be no incentive (nor possibility), to multiply, and no need, consequently, to support growing ghettos.But does ghetto-ising the problem really address it ?
..so in my opinion, if some scumbag cannot live at peace with other people - then fuck him and fed him fish heads (thank you, brother ancona). Scumbag village is a GREAT idea, with one caveat - NO PUBLIC MONEY SPENT on these fuckers. ZERO dollars, ZERO cents per head.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?