An alternative view for those that think highly of Thomas Massie
- Thread starter foolsgold
- Start date
Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums
Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.
Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!
Viking
Yellow Jacket
Ignorance is bliss.
Bongino. The sellout who was told not to question the 2020 election - and obeyed.
Who got inside the compound, to clean it up - and instead, quit and ran home.
ZERO interest.
Massie may be flawed - maybe the same way Trump has been compromised. The bad forces just haven't found his vulnerable region, yet.
We won't learn it from this guy.
Who got inside the compound, to clean it up - and instead, quit and ran home.
ZERO interest.
Massie may be flawed - maybe the same way Trump has been compromised. The bad forces just haven't found his vulnerable region, yet.
We won't learn it from this guy.
Exactly my thoughts....
- Messages
- 42,761
- Reaction score
- 7,255
- Points
- 288
Things are not the way you are describing them.
There is a thread on Epstein because it is highly news worthy. Epstein along with his merry men and a few women trafficked in underage women who became sexual slaves to some very rich and powerful men, some of who either were, or are, in high government and financial positions. They should be exposed for who they are, what they did and, if possible, pay for what they did.
As to Jooos, there are two threads on Israel. I've posted in both of them, and to me, most of the stuff I've seen is quite tame considering the place most here came from (#2.)
There is some subject matter discussed here that I don't particularly care for. In those cases I either blow past posts on them or simply limit my time in those threads to a cursory visit. Works for me, may be give it a try?
One last thing, I really don't take the political posts too seriously. It's an internet forum with a cross section of society and we all have out own views and opinions. And I enjoy reading different opinions other than my own, especially if I can learn something. Plus it's neat to hear how others think.
jm2c
I think that most everyone agrees, but what in the data released is actually actionable in a court of law?
I haven't seen any "smoking gun" evidence in any of the files.
Questionable stuff? Absolutely.
....but none of it rises to the level required for conviction.
The only way anything will be done, is if the victims start speaking and making accusations.
After all, what other cases have you ever heard of that result in convictions where the victims never testified or made accusations against those that victimized them?
Only in cases of murder does that happen.
....but in those cases there is a body.
In Epstein's case, we got no bodies, no actual evidence, and no victim affidavits.
All we have is a past conviction where his debt to society was supposedly already paid, and a lot of hear say.
Even his sidekick was only convicted of obtaining girls for Epstein's personal use. Ie: not for anyone beyond Epstein.
Nothing is getting released. Or even investigated.
Trump's controllers have other fish to fry...a Surveillance Utopia to build, quick.
Trump's controllers have other fish to fry...a Surveillance Utopia to build, quick.
That was getting done no matter who the POTUS is and has been being worked towards for a lot longer than Trump's been in office.
To say that if it wasn't for Trump we'd living in a surveilance-free society, would be naive.
.....and I know you aren't that. The surveillance techno-state has been building for a long time.
Still, where are all the victims?
At this point they'd be media darlings.
Also, how many decades did this go on again? There should be hoards of now grown women who were victimized.
Surely at least some of them could come forward. At this point, who tf wouldn't believe 'em?
Especially if they had even the smallest shred of evidence connecting themselves to Epstein.
The press would be all over it.
IMHO, that's the only way anything is gonna happen.
After all, I can't think of any sexual misconduct, or statutory rape case, or other sex crime against someone where there wasn't a victim saying "he touched me there" or a dad pressing statutory rape charges, or some other direct proof of someone having done something sexual to someone they ought not have done it to.
....and I doubt there is anything in any Epstein emails openly discussing such things.
What needs to be found out, and that no one is really talking about, is who mishandled the searches of his properties?
The island wasn't searched for about a month after his arrest, neither was his ranch and evidence was lost when they raided his home but left his safe open as well as the front door unlocked and had left evidence in the home that later was missing.
That's the shit people need to be asking about.
...which people?
Blondie's people, maybe?
And how come no one is asking about it NOW.
(mic drop)
Blondie's people, maybe?
And how come no one is asking about it NOW.
(mic drop)
- Messages
- 2,118
- Reaction score
- 2,543
- Points
- 283
A lot of women have been paid off already and probably signed NDA's so they cant talk about it.
I think Bongino went in and after finding out that everyone was required to play defense for the pedophiles, decided to leave. Bondi did a great job playing blocker and she's getting rewarded now. I think Patel enjoys "reviewing" the evidence so he stays on and keeps his job.
The FBI is notorious for going in and grabbing evidence and killing all investigations thereafter. It's what they do best.
As for the jews, I guess we can start with the USS liberty and end with them getting us involved in yet another war in the Middle East.
I think Bongino went in and after finding out that everyone was required to play defense for the pedophiles, decided to leave. Bondi did a great job playing blocker and she's getting rewarded now. I think Patel enjoys "reviewing" the evidence so he stays on and keeps his job.
The FBI is notorious for going in and grabbing evidence and killing all investigations thereafter. It's what they do best.
As for the jews, I guess we can start with the USS liberty and end with them getting us involved in yet another war in the Middle East.
NDA's (and contracts in general) are unenforceable if they cover illegal activities.
However, I think the reason why there is virtual silence from his victims is because they knew when they were involved with him, exactly what was going on and what their roles were in it.
Ie: to get rich powerful people into compromising situations, and be well paid for it.
That stuff happened during Trump's first term.
Keep in mind that just because leadership is changed, it doesn't always mean all subordinates suddenly shift their way of thinking to that of the new guy.
There were, and are, many gov employees in all agencies that aren't on-board with Trump.
We saw it in his first term as well as in this one.
He didn't do any of that.
But his JOB, as Chief Executive (including, chief of law enforcement for these United States) is to IDENTIFY these crimes, and then refer them for PROSECUTION.
Not to make funny faces when asked, followed by midnight Mean Tweets that night.
Viking
Yellow Jacket
- Messages
- 42,761
- Reaction score
- 7,255
- Points
- 288
One thing I don't understand about our latest foray over there. For 40 years Netanyahu has been trying to get us to attack Iran. Both R & D presidents said no. They may have consulted with our intelligence agencies along with those of our allies before telling Netty to hit the bricks. They also knew what would probably happen in the SoH. T said ok.
I'll probably never know what prompted him to go along with Netty but I'd sure like to. Was it praise? Money? Or does Netty have some big time dirt on T?
My bet is dirt.
Senility.
That, with appeals to Trump's vanity. There is no denying he's a narcissist.
That's not unusual with a political figure, but combined with a mind that's coming apart - dementia, or Jab neurological disorders seen in many patients, now - it probably made him open to the idea. Sell the old fool on the idea of making history for all time.
As opposed to another round of court challenges and Impeachments.