[Chart] XAU index/gold ratio shows insane undervaluation of miners

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more. You can visit the forum page to see the list of forum nodes (categories/rooms) for topics.

Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!

swissaustrian

Yellow Jacket
Messages
2,049
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Chart by James Turk:

http***kingworldnews.com/kingworldnews/KWN_DailyWeb/Entries/2012/4/20_Turk_-_The_Most_Important_%26_Extraordinary_Chart_for_2012_files/King%20World%20News%20-%20James%20Turk%20-%20The%20Most%20Important%20Chart%20for%202012.jpg

Explanation:

http***kingworldnews.com/kingworldnews/KWN_DailyWeb/Entries/2012/4/20_Turk_-_The_Most_Important_%26_Extraordinary_Chart_for_2012.html

My take: One thing should be added. Cash costs per ounce have been going up for the miners lately, so part of the decline of the ratio can be attributed to this as profitability of many miners didn't rise as fast as the gold price . However, the current levels are so extreme, miners are clearly undervalued.

Mod edit: Dead links/images
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Miners are still as cheap as they could get relative to the metal:

http***kingworldnews.com/kingworldnews/KWN_DailyWeb/Entries/2012/12/14_KWN_Friday_Gold_Chart_Mania_files/KWN%20Laird%205.jpg

Mod edit: Dead image
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I also believe Au and Ag stocks are very undervalued. 2013 will be a very good year for PM stocks as the metals will rise to new highs.
 
I agree on your take & I think that the interesting chart would be the one that shows '# of goldgrams needed to mine one goldgram' from 1986 to present.

To my amateur eye the price of gold relative to stocks might not be so relevant? I think gold miners are buys relative to their profitability not the price of gold.

If gold was at $10 000 an ounce, gold stocks would look even more undervalued but if the cost to mine an ounce was $11000 then they would be a bad buy no?

It looks like a reason to hold gold and not gold stocks.

If PM's are possibly being slightly suppressed, then it makes sense that miners input costs could be rising faster than the gold price which means gold stocks will continue to be less and less profitable.

However unlike the miners, as an owner of gold you like rising input costs because it creates a higher and higher floor for the gold price. I mean if demand already exceeds supply and supply can't be mined for less than whatever it is - say $1300 an ounce then you have a limited downside. (+ the input costs will rise 1. with the real not fake rate of inflation and 2. Will rise even faster than inflation as the cost of mining lower & lower ore grades will continue to make new mined ounces even more expensive.)
 
Last edited:

XAU index/gold ratio shows insane undervaluation of miners​


@Goldhedge
@searcher
... can we replace XAU with a gold miners index handle?

xau is gold
gold index/gold ratio doesn't make any sense
 
The PHLX Gold/Silver Sector Index (XAU) is a capitalization-weighted index composed of companies involved in the gold or silver mining industry.


XAU is a gold miner index. You are welcome to update the thread with a (chart using a) different index if you know of one that is better suited to the purpose.
 
aaaahhhh my bad

so, XAU is both the handle for forex gold and for a gold miner index
who knew...

thanks PMB!
 
When they start running the ETFs will go 5x-10x. Then sell.

They said the same thing about silver vs. gold and then the silver dam finally broke.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…