Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.
Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!
so much for NG saving us....
http://www.theautomaticearth.com/de...-great-unwashed-american-energy-independence/
Yeah, only about 20 billion barrels of oil with todays technology, we probably should just abandon it since it will run out in the next 20-50-100 years. Oh and burning off over a billion dollars worth of nat gas every year makes more sense than building a pipeline and/or adding rail capacity.
So why are serious analysts like Rude Ludekern (??) who has been in the oil extracting industry for all his career and gets respect from most quarters, saying that the depletion rates are so high the numbers do not add up ?
Why did Exxon and Shell pull out ?
Its easy to claim numbers in the ground ..........
So why are serious analysts like Rude Ludekern (??) who has been in the oil extracting industry for all his career and gets respect from most quarters, saying that the depletion rates are so high the numbers do not add up ?
Why did Exxon and Shell pull out ?
Its easy to claim numbers in the ground ..........
rblong2us, the cornicopians believe ANYTHING that will keep them from having to look at reality....
I have no idea who that is, but if you don't believe the oil is coming out of the ground here and has been for years, then I suspect you don't believe Australia exists either and aren't going to believe those of us who live here and see the stuff coming out of the ground. I am done wasting my time trying to convince people who just stick their fingers in their ears and scream "I don't believe it's real."
LOL, here's the chief kid with the fingers in the ears. After getting so embarrassed in the other thread you had to start another thread to try and figure out what you were going to deny next. First you said it was "science" that it was impossible to ship nat gas via ships. Then you said it was too hard to come up with the technology even if it was scientifically possible. Then you said it just wasn't profitable enough for your tastes, so these companies shouldn't attempt it, even though they have been doing it for decades. I don't know how many times I can keep telling you science deniers that it IS possible and it IS profitable, especially if the GOVT. and the enviro-wackos get out of the way. After umpteen times it's clear you just can't accept reality and/or are a big govt. enviro-wacko yourself.
I have no idea who that is, but if you don't believe the oil is coming out of the ground here and has been for years, then I suspect you don't believe Australia exists either and aren't going to believe those of us who live here and see the stuff coming out of the ground. I am done wasting my time trying to convince people who just stick their fingers in their ears and scream "I don't believe it's real."
... but if it costs a dollar to recover a dollars worth of energy ...
...
The forecast by the Shale Energy Industry that the U.S. will be able to grow its natural gas production for a decade at a price below $4.50 MMBtu, seems to be losing credibility as the price of natural gas has already shot above the $5 level.
...
...
According to energy analysts David Hughes and Art Berman… the Bakken and Eagle Ford have a limited number of drilling locations available, and the wells in these fields suffer extremely high decline rates. The shale energy companies exploited the SWEET SPOTS first, so the remaining locations will be less productive.
If we consider these factors, shale oil production in the U.S. will more than likely peak 2015-2016. ...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?