CleverNickname
Fly on the Wall
- Messages
- 7
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.
Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!
I would lean towards 90% too, but the bolded text gives me concern. Would it be easier to convince someone completely uninformed about metals that the old coins were actually made of silver or that the fractional generic is actually made of silver? I'm really not sure about this one, probably not a bad idea to have some of both.Link or pic? I'm not familiar with the coin you are talking about. And, that would give me pause because if you are looking for metal to use for barter in a SHTF scenario (and I assume that's the point of a fractionally divisible round/bar), you are going to want something that people will recognize and trust.
I'm sure that many people these days don't even know that pre-1965 quarters, dimes and half-dollars are 90% silver, but it's easy enough to corroborate that fact and I believe people will trust US mint coins aren't counterfeit.
My gut reaction would be to prefer 90% silver. YMMV.
Thanks, KMS.
To risk getting just a little further of topic... Honey is one of the few foods that will never go bad if stored in a simple canning jar at room temp. I buy it in 60 lbs buckets from a friend at a great price. It is alot like silver, but with more marginal utility
The premium oz per oz is more on the divisibles than a normal oz, but so it is with fractional rounds. My point was that as this thread was talking about them and I had come across some that the premium isn't as high as compared to a lot of other divisibles I've seen. You generally have to pay an extra premium for convenience, so it's up to the person to decide what they're willing to pay for. I never understand coin collectors who pay crazy prices for a coin just cause it came from a certain mint or was printed in a certain year, even though an identical coin from a different year or mint is a fraction of the price, but to each his own.
Perhaps I could have come across as a little bit less of a dick. :judge:
I did not mean to disparage, merely to point out that among "the bugs" the combi-bars would be immediately recognizable for trade and whatnot, however I feel pretty strongly in diversification, so having bought so much sovereign silver such as Maples and Eagles, I have picked up a tidy pile of junk to accompany the whole ounce units. I've also picked up "fractionals" from Apmex, because I thought they were cool and unusual. While I may pick up some combi-bars in the future, I would like to see them become more of a mainstream item before getting too much of them/it. I see nothing wrong with divisibility going down to the gram size, and like the idea as a smart way to get to dollar or less values for small transactions, it is just that when it comes to acceptance and recognition by the general public, it may take a while to get around and become readily fungible.:wave:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?