Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.
Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!
we are going to see a huge resurgence of third world diseases in this country that were hitherto eradicated.
Not oblivious. Its intentional. Its all done by design.He seems to be asleep at the switch or possibly doesn't care at all for the risk to this country.
Because he's in on it?I don't understand why he is not being forceful in his opposition to the trafficing of this drug into our land. I know that he son is well reported on his drug addictions and possiby to a lesser extent is his daughter's drug problems. He needs to step up and address this abonimation.
think governments have no business telling people what they can or can't ingest. But I also don't think society should be on the hook for medical services for folks who engage in self destructive behaviors.
Libertarian?It's always interesting to see folks' position on the drugs issue. I personally lean libertarian in my political ethos and think governments have no business telling people what they can or can't ingest. But I also don't think society should be on the hook for medical services for folks who engage in self destructive behaviors.
Yes. Do you think the comment you bolded is inconsistent?Libertarian?
Very.Yes. Do you think the comment you bolded is inconsistent?
You think there is no difference between a libertarian philosophy for governance - (specifically a limitation on government's chilling/censoring speech) - and an individual's right to enforce norms/rules within the confines (or use) of their personal property? You think that because someone does not believe that governmnent should infringe free speech that same someone would have no expectations, limitations or standards for speech/conduct of guests in their home (or on their property)? If so, I think you are quite mistaken.Libertarians generally don't tell other folks what they can and can not say.
You think there is no difference between a libertarian philosophy for governance - (specifically a limitation on government's chilling/censoring speech) - and an individual's right to enforce norms/rules within the confines (or use) of their personal property?
You think that because someone does not believe that governmnent should infringe free speech that same someone would have no expectations, limitations or standards for speech/conduct of guests in their home (or on their property)?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?