FOMC takedown

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more. You can visit the forum page to see the list of forum nodes (categories/rooms) for topics.

Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!

Thanks for all the updates sa.
 
I'm seeing reports in various corners like this:
http://whatreallyhappened.com/conte...-possible-us-if-events-europe-become-contag-0

However, I checked the video (pertinent Q&A found @ ~47:25 mark): http://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/fomcpresconf20130320.htm

and believe the Bernank's response is being mischaracterized.
 
Could someone please decipher the bar chart SA posted. I am "chartarded" and can't seem to process the information this morning.
 
Could someone please decipher the bar chart SA posted. I am "chartarded" and can't seem to process the information this morning.

This is showing the expectations of the fomc's 19 participants (the seven members of the FED's Board of Governors and the 12 FED district presidents, only five of which vote at a time) regarding the timing of raising interest rates (upper chart) and the level of the fed funds rate at the end of 2013, 2014, 2015 and beyond (lower chart).
If you add up the numbers or the dots, you'll get 19 each time.
 
If I'm reading it right, most FOMC members are looking to 2015 or so to make any significant changes to QE policy.
 
...and of course, it is all their current expectations, that might (and will) be re-evaluated, as I still cannot square that circle, how we could solve the problem with >>> GLOBAL <<< debt overhang, by trying to force-feed everyone and anyone, with ever increasing amounts of debts - all the same, "tightening lending standards" :shrug: :loco:
 
FOMC minutes are due tomorrow at 2pm.
The bad employment numbers were not published when the minutes were written in March, so I don't expect anything new. Consequently, the reaction in pms should be muted.
I we get a dovish surprise, we could get another short squeeze bump to the upside like today.

Miners are signalling a surprise:

GDXJ
15.78 +0.58 +3.84%

GDX
36.00 +1.35 +3.90%

^HUI
337.63 +13.45 +4.15%

On the importance of miners for predicting news release effects on pms, see here:
http://www.pmbug.com/forum/f14/frontrunning-mining-stocks-2249/
 
Last edited:
FOMC minutes released early because:

This shocker just hit the tape:

FED TO RELEASE FOMC MINUTES AT 9 A.M. VS SCHEDULED 2 P.M.
FED: MINUTES MISTAKENLY SENT EARLY TO CONGRESS, TRADE GROUPS

So the Fed now pre-releases data to US politicians ahead of everyone else. What else does the Fed leak to those for whom frontrunning is still legal? And as if we needed more confirmation, the market is now officially a complete circus.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-...arly-due-early-release-congressional-staffers
 
Trade groups? What a farce this "free market" is.
 
let's face it, it seems that every last one investor have figured out already, that the Fed WILL continue to print, until it cannot print no more - regardless what they have to say...

this is going to be some sight to behold, when it stops...
 
http://money.cnn.com/2013/04/10/news/economy/fed-minutes-early/index.html
 
lol. Clarence Beeks strikes again.

 
Maybe I missed it in the thread but it doesn't matter if the Fed starts to unwind its position or even just slow bond purchasing.

The damage has already been done and it would take amazing momentum in the markets as well as jobs etc. to absorb the damage.

We are in this for awhile.

I'll continue to buy the dips till I see different.

-Q
 
Isn't it funny how the early release of the minutes totally changed the way they were traded?
There was no significant reaction in any market, no hft bs. Maybe they should make posting news releases randomly throughout the day the new standard modus operandi...
 
Why would the FED send the minutes to anyone if they intended to do it after the official release to the public? It available as a pdf on the FED's website...

This is standard procedure and somebody blew the whistle, so they had to come clean.

Totally coincidal:

NONE OF THE PEOPLE ON THE LIST ALERTED THE FED THAT THEY RECEIVED NONPUBLIC INFO A DAY EARLY

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-...e-employees-goldman-barclays-#comment-3433603
 
I guarantee that this was not the first time either. Well, it was the first time they got caught, but not the first time they leaked data. I'll bet one of you chartists could track down suspicious movement within the markets and find numerous other instances. anyhow, what the everlovin fuck are the minutes broadcast to these parasites for in the first place?? shouldn't they be required to go to the FED website like the rest of the proletariats?

Will someone please stop the planet, I want to get off now.

: - (
 
I happen to like my little bit of this planet. It's some others I'd like to see get off - preferably without it stopping so they hit space harder.
 
"EMPLOYEES AT GOLDMAN SACHS, BARCLAYS, JP MORGAN, CITI, NOMURA, UBS, HSBC RECEIVED FED MINUTES EARLY YESTERDAY"

So, the dirty hands of the PPT basically.
 
Found a link to this in the comments on SD:
http://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/files/FOMC20030625meeting.pdf
 
Why is gold down today? Oh yeah.. That's right.. it's FOMC day..
 
No no no.... ADP numbers released this morning were dissappointing. It's all about fundamentals don't you know.
 
Yeah...ADP ...which does NOT cover the entire workforce.

You see..I'm an accountant by trade and I know of many small businesses who do not use ADP.

In fact, ADP #'s are constantly being revised as they DONT MEAN SHIT!

I heard this morning that the Fed is looking to easing buying by the end of this year and into 2014.

Wait..I mean I've heard that before right?

/facepalm

-Q
 
Holiday in Europe and China. plus the FOMC..

I was even expecting a correction to start this week but this is just dumb. I figured they would be reacting to news as an excuse that sounded at least somewhat plausible.

The ADP number was horrible.
 

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-...stimulus-with-qe-cut-by-end-of-this-year.html

We all know the Fed is in the business of managing expectations...
 
It is a rather historic transfer of wealth without the public getting a chance to vote on whether they agree with it or not. We just get to read the minutes.
 
FOMC announcement later today. Tapering rhetoric expected. Both gold and silver are close to support levels and the manipulators might be tempted to try to push them through 1320 / 20 . However, they're up intraday on no news.
If the FED comes out less hawkish than expected, we might see upside in the metals. Tapering seems to be priced in already.
During the last weeks, the FED always became nervous when bonds yields spiked and stocks fell. They reacted immediately via mouthpieces and assured that everything would be fine. They will be very cautious in talking about any cut back in QE.
 
This chatter about tapering is utter bullshit.

It isn't QE stopping but slowing down IF they do it.

That means the printing press is still going.

People just don't understand how to grasp this.

The fed is going to try and slow down this convoy of 18 wheelers while trying to move space and time so the destination doesn't matter how long it takes for delivery while those depending will also just have to adjust and wait because they can.

Right!

-Q
 
During the last weeks, the FED always became nervous when bonds yields spiked and stocks fell. They reacted immediately via mouthpieces and assured that everything would be fine. They will be very cautious in talking about any cut back in QE.

Great insight!
 
*fed maintains $85 billion monthly pace of bond buying
*fed says labor market shows `further improvement'
*fed says downside risks diminished since autumn
*bullard, george dissent from fomc statement
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…