Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.
Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!
And expensive... https://www.tradewindsnews.com/tank...eadly-strait-of-hormuz-tug-attack/2-1-1956065 and the Iranians hit a container ship too. I wonder how the mainstream media missed that one.If implemented this will be on the American taxpayer.
The arab countries got the message, no point in continuing when they really need to finish off Israel.
It's official: Iran is backing down.
President Pezeshkian is now apologizing and confirming that they are halting all missile attacks against neighboring countries: "No missiles will be fired unless an attack against Iran originates from these countries."
It's fascinating how quickly the will for "diplomacy" emerges as soon as one's military capacity is wiped out.
Strength is the only language understood in this region.
Do you agree that this is the "Trump effect" in real time, or what do you think is behind the sudden turnaround?
Sure thing karen, I can see how angry you are each day that isn't a disaster for the USA.Marines are on the way over as well as 82nd on notice. Another carrier group is on the way as well as other vessels loading up and getting ready to depart San Diego.
Maybe it is over and Benji just has other plans for our military. Once all of our assets are in theater Israel can give Trump his orders.
That is funny as hell! It's kind of hard to fire missiles with drones circling whats left of your missile sites just waiting for something to move so they can shoot it.
It's official: Iran is backing down.
President Pezeshkian is now apologizing and confirming that they are halting all missile attacks against neighboring countries: "No missiles will be fired unless an attack against Iran originates from these countries."
It's fascinating how quickly the will for "diplomacy" emerges as soon as one's military capacity is wiped out.
Strength is the only language understood in this region.
Do you agree that this is the "Trump effect" in real time, or what do you think is behind the sudden turnaround?
Will you still be angry if one year from now Persia is free and functioning? Of course you will, unlike these weak bitches that change with the wind direction you are a very consistent hater. I don't agree but I respect strong opinions.Actually, they make us spend billions everyday, while they sip tea in the shade and fire an occasional $25,000 drone at Israel, when we run out of anti missile stuff they will finish off Israel. As the saying goes "They don't have to win, they just need not to lose".
Hitler looked good until he didn't, Stalin had a nice long run, Mao too...until America frees itself from Israeli dominance, we ain't got much to talk aboutWill you still be angry if one year from now Persia is free and functioning? Of course you will, unlike these weak bitches that change with the wind direction you are a very consistent hater. I don't agree but I respect strong opinions.
The people in Venezuela look to be pretty happy now, I'm praying the same for Persia.
.
We are good at covid vaccines too. And forecasting global warming. And predicting American failure.Nuke israel now, free America...hell, genocide is one of the few things we are good at.
I see you get triggered when I expose the truth. Sucks to be you. I get it, you don't like that I point out the lies being spewed by this administration. However, you seem to have translated that into me wanting something bad to happen to our country and I don't. In fact I dont think 1 American should give their life for Israel let alone putting thousands at risk because of them. Week1 and we already have Americans coming home in body bags. Not acceptable to me.Sure thing karen, I can see how angry you are each day that isn't a disaster for the USA.
Sucks to be you.
Maybe something absolutely horrible will happen today and you and your minions will be happy again!
.
What number of dead Iranians is acceptable to you for them to be happy?Will you still be angry if one year from now Persia is free and functioning? Of course you will, unlike these weak bitches that change with the wind direction you are a very consistent hater. I don't agree but I respect strong opinions.
The people in Venezuela look to be pretty happy now, I'm praying the same for Persia.
.
I thought the Iraqi people would welcome the invading US forces with flowers and open arms.Will you still be angry if one year from now Persia is free and functioning? Of course you will, unlike these weak bitches that change with the wind direction you are a very consistent hater. I don't agree but I respect strong opinions.
The people in Venezuela look to be pretty happy now, I'm praying the same for Persia.
.
We survived high oil prices before, we'll do it again.Disclaimer: Came across this by accident. Watched it and consider it to be an interesting view point. I can not vouch for it's veracity so you should take it fwiw and dyodd. Also, there's nothing to see so you'll be better off listening in one tab, playing around the forum in a different tab.
UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER: Wall Street's 1979 Playbook Against Trump
Mar 7, 2026
Barbara Boyd argues that warnings of a 1979-style oil shock after President Trump’s call for Iran’s unconditional surrender are a manufactured panic pushed by the City of London’s financial press and anti-Trump figures to trigger an economic crisis and swing the Midterms. Citing Karoline Leavitt’s definition of surrender as eliminating Iran’s threat, Boyd revisits the 1979 Iranian Revolution, describing the Shah’s industrial and nuclear modernization, opposition from Anglo-American financial interests, and a strategy of “Controlled Disintegration” associated with the Council on Foreign Relations’ Project 1980s. She claims the Shah was overthrown via a human-rights campaign and the Muslim Brotherhood, leading Khomeini to cancel modernization and enabling an oil shock that benefited London banks. Boyd says the same playbook is now aimed at Trump’s pro-worker economic program, but that U.S. energy strength and security measures reduce oil-shock risk; she concludes that ending the Khamenei regime would remove a long-standing economic weapon and ultimately stabilize energy markets.
11:58
YesWho knows? We're inundated with articles and videos about "the truth about..." The city of London, the Saudis, Iran, Trump, etc., etc. What's the truth and what is just the new narrative the powers that be are trying to sell as they attempt a controlled demolition of the current order and try to transition to the next new world order? Or is it all just lies told by evil factions fighting for dominance?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?