Welcome to the PMBug forums - a community supported watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.
Register a free account to join the discussions. When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including access to market data/charts and additional members only rooms (including one for trade/barter with the community).
Why can't it be both?I've wondered if she was in it for the $$$$$. That I can understand. If she's the real deal I think she needs her head examined. lol
No not jealous at all. I'm not jealous of anybody about anything. Its my greatest strength. If this kid wants to make the Palestinians her new cause then maybe she should also mention the incredible cruelty of 7 Oct. Or is she one of those whackos that think it didn't really happen and instead was a creation of the Zionist news media?Jealous much...Dave Portnoy rich guy with an opinion on everything also annoys me, I get the feeling our zionist buddies are pushing both these people...by the way, 2 million really isn't much anymore.
MONEY....causes ecological damage.She may be dumb but she's smart enough to know how to count cash and she's pretty young to be worth $2 m USD, at least. And she's passing on college, I'm guessing, because colleges you have to pay instead of the other way around. Which would severely impact your gold and silver foot print. Greta really knows how to make a spectacle of herself but I guess in the end it pays $$$.
It’s been almost six years since the delinquent child activist Greta Thunberg promoted a so-called scientist’s warning that “climate change will wipe out all of humanity unless we stop using fossil fuels” by 2023. The scientist in question, Harvard University professor James Anderson, also predicted “there will be no floating ice remaining” in the Arctic Ocean by 2022 absent a “Marshall Plan-style endeavor in which all of the world takes extreme measures to to transition off of fossil fuels completely within the next five years.” That didn’t happen, but climate activists are still warning that the Arctic could be ice-free at some point between 2035 and 2067.
Not surprisingly, there is a long history—dating back to the 1970s—of so-called climate scientists and government bureaucrats making catastrophic predictions about the environment that never materialized. Here are 10 of the most egregious examples. Enjoy!
1) In 1970, S. Dillon Ripley, a wildlife conservationist who served as secretary of the Smithsonian Institute, warned that 75 percent to 80 percent of species would be extinct by 1995. Wrong.
2) In 1970, Kenneth Watt, an ecologist and professor at the University of California, Davis, warned that “there won’t be any more crude oil,” that “none of our land will be usable” for agriculture, and the world would be 11 degrees colder by the year 2000. False.
3) In 1970, biologist Paul Ehrlich at Stanford University warned that by the end of the decade up to 200 million people would die each year from starvation due to overpopulation, life expectancy would plummet to 42 years, and all ocean life would perish. Extremely false.
4) In 1970, Peter Gunter, a professor at North Texas State University, predicted that “world population will outrun food supplies” and “the entire world, with the exception of Western Europe, North America, and Australia, will be in famine” by the year 2000. Didn’t happen.
5) In 1971, Dr. S. I. Rasool, an atmospheric scientist at NASA, predicted the coming of a “new ice age” within 50 years. Incorrect.
6) In 1975, Ehrlich, the Stanford biologist, warned that 90 percent of tropical rainforests and 50 percent of species would disappear within 30 years. Erroneous.
7) In 1988, Hussein Shihab, environmental affairs director of the Maldives, warned that his island nation would be completely underwater within 30 years, which wouldn’t even matter because experts also predicted the Maldives would run out of drinking water by 1992. False.
8) In 2004, a Pentagon analysis warned of global anarchy due to climate change. Major European cities would be underwater by 2020, at which point Britain would suffer from a “Siberian” climate. Extremely false.
9) In 2008, Bob Woodruff of ABC News hosted a two-hour climate change special warning that New York City could be underwater by 2015, among other apocalyptic predictions. Didn’t happen.
10) In 2009, former vice president and climate activist Al Gore predicted the Arctic Ocean would have no ice by 2014, which is the same thing Greta Thunberg said would happen by 2022. Nope.
She's promoting democide. Depopulation as the Club of Rome has privately plotted for, for 55 years.Her self-righteousness damages any cause she is advocating. She has a bad attitude and looks like a homeless teenage boy.
How old is this knucklehead kid ?
She has nothing of value to make bank on.Greta needs a make over. Remember Miss Congeniality? Greta should disappear for a while, find someone who could help her with a complete make over. When she surfaces she could denounce climate change, claim she was brainwashed at a young age and has now seen the light. She could hit the talk show and lecture circuits and make bank.
She could - maybe, depending on how much of her brain is left. She could come out, wholesome, denounce what she did...flash her bare belly some more...hire a makeup artist to keep the plastic thick enough...and become the next, I dunno, Pamela Bondi.Greta needs a make over. Remember Miss Congeniality? Greta should disappear for a while, find someone who could help her with a complete make over. When she surfaces she could denounce climate change, claim she was brainwashed at a young age and has now seen the light. She could hit the talk show and lecture circuits and make bank.
She has nothing of value to make bank on.
That's exactly what people without value, do. Act and con. It's all they got.I'm thinking more along the lines of a con, an act.
That's exactly what people without value, do. Act and con. It's all they got.
What most people in the public eye, do.That's exactly what people without value, do. Act and con. It's all they got.
I already know.As soon as I read this I thought of one man in particular. Care to take a guess who?
Dif is that Trump does in fact have value.
I didn't care enough to find out if it's clickbait. Is it?
Did you intend to use the plural? Whatever your answer is, I am sure it will be interesting.She will be doing snuff films soon.
They need to make money too, and making videos takes time and effort.I gave you a thank you because your answer made me smile.
Value, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder.
Look at all the media influencers. You have Rs, Ds, gays, straights, fitness peeps, mental health peeps, religious peeps, all sorts of peeps telling you all kinds of shit. They are all selling merch, all asking for donations, most have a members only sections that costs $$$ to join. It all about the $$$$s.
I could see her in either role.Did you intend to use the plural? Whatever your answer is, I am sure it will be interesting.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?