Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.
Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!
...
In a letter sent on Wednesday to the Canadian Minister of Energy and Natural Resources, Jonathan Wilkinson, the CEOs of 19 miners, including top producers Coeur Mining, Hecla Mining, and First Majestic Silver, say that considering silver a critical mineral would position the country to be a supplier of choice for strategic allies.
...
The Energy Act of 2020 defines a “critical material” as:
- Any non-fuel mineral, element, substance, or material that the Secretary of Energy determines: (i) has a high risk of supply chain disruption; and (ii) serves an essential function in one or more energy technologies, including technologies that produce, transmit, store, and conserve energy; or
- A critical mineral, as defined by the Secretary of the Interior.
The Energy Act of 2020 defines a “critical mineral” as:...
- Any mineral, element, substance, or material designated as critical by the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of the U.S. Geological Survey.
...
The Department's list of critical minerals is not static and will be reviewed at least every three years and revised as necessary to reflect current data on supply, demand, and concentration of production, as well as current policy priorities, as required under the Energy Act. The 2022 final list of critical minerals was created using the most recent available data for non-fuel minerals and the current state of the methodology for evaluation of criticality.
The methodology used to develop the 2022 final list of critical minerals is based on the definition of “critical mineral” and the criteria specified in The Energy Act. The methodology was published by the USGS in 2020 [1] and 2021 [2] and includes three evaluations: (1) A quantitative evaluation of supply risk wherever sufficient data were available, (2) a semi-quantitative evaluation of whether the supply chain had a single point of failure, and (3) a qualitative evaluation when other evaluations were not possible. The quantitative evaluation uses (A) a net import reliance indicator of the dependence of the U.S. manufacturing sector on foreign supplies, (B) an enhanced production concentration indicator which focuses on production concentration outside of the United States, and (C) weights for each producing country's production contribution by its ability or willingness to continue to supply the United States. Further details on the underlying rationale and the specific approach, data sources, and assumptions used to calculate each component of the supply risk metrics are described in the references cited in this notice.
...
... In addition to informing crosscutting DOE priorities including the Critical Materials Research, Development, Demonstration, and Commercialization Application Program (RDD&CA), the DOE Critical Materials List will inform eligibility for tax credits under the Inflation Reduction Act 48C
...
...
For more than a decade, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has funded basic and applied research and development (R&D) related to critical materials to address the scientific and technological (S&T) challenges that underpin supply chain vulnerabilities. These investments were made possible through the first DOE Critical Materials Strategy in 2010. This included the first DOE Critical Materials Assessment – identifying which materials were critical for clean energy technologies. It also defined the pillars that form the foundation of the DOE research strategy that guided these investments.
The Energy Act of 2020 expanded DOE authorities to address critical materials challenges through a Critical Materials Research, Development, Demonstration, and Commercialization Application (RDD&CA) Program. The Critical Materials RDD&CA Program allows DOE to invest across the entire research continuum and supply chain. Through the Critical Materials RDD&CA Program, DOE implements the DOE Vision and Strategy for Critical Minerals and Materials (CMM):
Vision:
- Develop reliable, resilient, affordable, diverse, sustainable, and secure domestic critical mineral and materials supply chains,
- support the clean energy transition and decarbonization of the energy, manufacturing, and transportation economies, and
- promote safe, sustainable, economic, and environmentally just solutions to meet current and future needs.
Strategy:
- Diversify & Expand Supply: Diversify and expand critical mineral and material supply from varying sources while minimizing waste and increasing techno-economic coproduction of materials – to ensure material availability;
- Develop Alternatives: Innovate alternative materials and/or manufacturing components – reduce demand and partially offset the need for virgin materials;
- Materials and Manufacturing Efficiency: Use and process materials efficiently across the entire supply chain and life cycle – to reduce waste;
- Circular Economy: Remanufacture, refurbish, repair, reuse, recycle, and repurpose – to extend the lifetime of materials and partially offset the need for virgin materials;
- Enabling Activities: Cross-cutting functions, such as criticality assessments, stockpiling, international engagement, market development, and advanced theoretical, computational, and experimental tools – to accelerate progress.
The 2023 Critical Materials Assessment will enable DOE to set priorities for investments through the Critical Materials RDD&CA, continuing advancements in S&T innovation in combination with expanded focus on derisking and deploying commercialization technologies to build and transform domestic supply chains.
...
so the miners want silver to be declared as critical mineral because of trade/tax benefits?"critical mineral" is a legal term and items classified as such are subject to special trade/tax rules.
As we said, leave it to the Government to try and change things with their idiotic "Legal" definitions. Still wrong.
...
While the mining leaders surveyed by KPMG want to see more action from Canada when it comes to critical minerals, the country has been advancing its Critical Minerals Strategy since its implementation in December 2022.
With substantial governmental backing worth nearly C$4 billion over eight years, notable milestones attained so far include the launch of the C$1.5 billion Critical Minerals Infrastructure Fund, which is aimed at fortifying clean energy and transportation infrastructure. Two critical minerals projects have also been allocated C$249 million.
...
KPMG also found that survey respondents have growing concerns about the potential non-renewal of the 15 percent federal Mineral Exploration Tax Credit in the 2024 budget. This credit incentivizes exploration targeting critical minerals excluded from the CMETC, as well as other non-critical minerals such as gold and silver.
...
Despite its critical role in military, industrial, and technological applications, silver remains conspicuously absent from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 2022 critical materials lists. These lists identify minerals essential to the U.S. economy, national security, and technological advancements, yet neither silver nor gold were included. This omission raises several questions, especially given silver’s growing demand across various sectors.
...
The omission of silver from the U.S. critical materials lists is perplexing, especially in light of its essential role in numerous high-demand sectors. Policymakers should consider reassessing silver’s status, ensuring the United States secures sufficient supplies to meet future needs. A thorough examination of supply chain vulnerabilities, demand trends, and potential geopolitical risks could be instrumental in shaping future policy decisions about silver.
As the world moves toward cleaner energy and more technologically advanced defense systems, silver’s strategic importance will only grow, underscoring the need for proactive measures to secure this precious resource.
The US House of Representatives has passed the Critical Mineral Consistency Act 2024, to expand the definition of officially designated critical minerals to include “critical materials” listed by the Department of Energy.
The US list of critical minerals will now include:
- copper
- electrical steel
- silicon
- and silicon carbide
Advantages to being listed as a critical mineral include eligibility for the FAST-41 permitting process in the list...
- accelerated permitting, in particular, eligibility for the FAST-41 permitting process
- investment incentives, including opportunities for federal subsidies and support for domestic projects
- national security enhancement, potentially leading to more direct government intervention in the sector
The bill modifies the Energy Act of 2020 and was passed with bipartisan support of both Republicans and Democrats. It must still pass the Senate.
By expanding the definition of critical minerals, the bill requires the US Geological Survey to include on any materials on Department of Energy’s list within 45 days of DOE adding a mineral, element, substance, or material to its critical materials list.
...
Today, U.S. Senators Mike Lee (R-Utah), Chairman of the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, and Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) introduced the Critical Mineral Consistency Act of 2025.
This bill eliminates disparities between the Critical Materials List created by the Department of Energy (DOE), and Critical Minerals List created by the U.S. Geological Survey within the Department of the Interior (DOI). Aligning these lists will improve our nation’s critical mineral supply chain by reducing confusion among industry and federal agencies, ensuring that all vital resources are treated equally. Senators Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.), Bill Cassidy (R-La.), John Curtis (R-Utah), and Jim Risch (R-Idaho), and are cosponsors of this legislation.
...
“Copper and other critical materials are essential to our energy security, manufacturing, and national defense, but federal bureaucracy has created confusion for producers,” said Senator Kelly. “We’re cutting through the red tape to make sure Arizona’s copper producers and other critical material suppliers can access the resources they need to strengthen our supply chains and support American jobs.”
...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?