Maguire: LBMA default triggered nuclear explosion in gold and silver

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more. You can visit the forum page to see the list of forum nodes (categories/rooms) for topics.

Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!

pmbug

Your Host
Administrator
Benefactor
Messages
14,353
Reaction score
4,532
Points
268
Location
Texas
I speculated the other day about the COMEX inventories possibly sparking defensive action by TPTB/PPT/etc.:
I wonder if the plundering of COMEX inventories may have prompted emergency action by the PPT to crash prices with an eye towards stopping that bleeding (by removing the incentive to take delivery).

It's something we've seen before.

Andrew Maguire says, it wasn't the COMEX, but the LBMA that was stressing:
http://kingworldnews.com/kingworldn...Default_Triggered_Gold_&_Silver_Takedown.html
 
The MF piece is pretty wild speculation, namely the thesis that Obama talked about gold mining with the major banking CEOs as well as that the COMEX will default "in the next week or several weeks".
 

More: http://www.clivemaund.com/gmu.php?art_id=68&date=2013-04-14
 
I think shutting the physical market down was not done to stop people from selling physical but rather to prohibit access to physical via dip buying...
As far as the result goes, ie hedging in futures, I agree with Mr Maud.
However, think about this: Now these pyhsical holders still own their bullion in London and they're sitting on short futures. So what are they going to do? Sell phys or cover shorts? So if Mr Maud is right about this tactic by the bullion banks, then they created a temporary gain for future pain, because physical didn't enter the market.
 
[Puts on tin foil hat]

The day before the crash, a closed door meeting (no media/reporters):
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2013/04/11/full-list-of-bankers-at-white-house-meeting-thursday/

[Removes tin foil hat]
 
JS Kim appear to agree with the OP thesis too:
More (long): http://www.theundergroundinvestor.c...els-gold-and-silver-price-slam-will-backfire/
 
Maguire elaborates on the supposed LBMA default:
More: http://kingworldnews.com/kingworldn...ates_On_The_LBMA_Default_&_Ensuing_Panic.html
 
Turd has a nice post today summarizing a lot of the news and speculation from the past week or so:
http://www.tfmetalsreport.com/blog/4667/gold-delivery-or-default

I still read Turd most days and respect his willingness to share his thoughts and access to people, that his website has created for him.
He gives the impression that he genuinely cares about us little folk and is always prepared to admit when he has got it wrong.

I guess it really comes down to a very simple choice -

either we accept that the markets are managed, or we accept that they are not and that the charts are the best way to predict market moves.

There are still a lot of people who will not accept that theres any significant intervention and then theres the rest of us, the conspiracy nuts who leap onto every headline that suggests it is all fixed.

Turd tries to join the dots .........

and in the process helps to keep me sane
 
...
either we accept that the markets are managed, or we accept that they are not and that the charts are the best way to predict market moves.
...

Ever watched curling? Once the stone is set into motion, the effort to keep it on track is indirect. If you only watched the stone, you might not notice the changes to the ice.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…