React19 v CICP - adjudicating vaccine injury claims

[pmbug]

People injured by the COVID-19 vaccines are suing the federal government, claiming the federal program they're forced to pursue compensation through is an opaque and unconstitutional "kangaroo court" that unjustly rejects almost all claims it receives.

"It has become far more obvious that the program offers nothing close to due process," says Christopher Dreisbach, the legal affairs director for React19, a patient group of the vaccine injured. "There's not [just] one thing about the program that can be tweaked and be fixed."

React19 is one of several plaintiffs challenging the constitutionality of the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP). The other plaintiffs are all individuals whose compensation claims were rejected by the CICP, despite many having diagnoses from their doctors that the severe injuries they experienced within a few hours or days of receiving a COVID-19 vaccine were a result of the vaccine.

Their lawsuit was filed in October in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana.
...

More:

Lawsuit: COVID vaccine injury claims diverted to unconstitutional 'kangaroo court'

A war on terror–era program is the only legal avenue for people seeking compensation for a COVID vaccine injury.

reason.com

 

[chieftain]

Pfizer and Moderna have immunity from any form of prosecution in the US.

The rest of the world though... not so much.

 

[Someone_else]

Pfizer and Moderna have immunity from any form of prosecution in the US.

What if they intentionally put methyl mercury or shellfish toxin in the shots? What if they put active ebola virus in the shots? What if they put black plague in the shots?

 

[chieftain]

What if they intentionally put methyl mercury or shellfish toxin in the shots? What if they put active ebola virus in the shots? What if they put black plague in the shots?

They could have loaded it with arsenic and sarin and they would still be immune. The immunity is unconditional.