Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.
Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!
... at the Supreme Court Tuesday, the court's conservative majority voiced skepticism about the independent agency Congress created to protect consumers from abuse in the financial services industry.
In the aftermath of the financial crisis, the CFPB enacted new rules to safeguard the mortgage market and protect consumers from abusive and misleading practices involving everything from credit cards to debt relief. The bureau is headed by a single director, appointed by the president for a five-year term, and lodged in the Federal Reserve.
In order to ensure the director's independence, the law bars the president from firing him or her for any reason except malfeasance, inefficiency, or neglect of duty.
It is that independence from presidential firing that is being challenged as unconstitutional by Seila Law — a law firm under CFPB investigation for misleading practices — and the Trump administration. Both the firm and the administration are asking the Supreme Court, if necessary, to strike down a long line of decisions going back almost a century, that uphold the structure of all independent regulatory agencies.
...
At the end of the day, there appeared to be five conservative justices unwilling to recognize that kind of independence for the CFPB, and four liberal justices with an opposite view.
A decision in the case is expected this summer.
President Donald Trump launched another attack on Jerome Powell Saturday, suggesting he could remove the Federal Reserve Chairman and place him in another role within the central bank.
Speaking to reporters at the White House as part of a briefing on efforts to combat the coronavirus outbreak, Trump once again expressed his displeasure with the Fed and its Chairman, accusing them of "following, not leading" in terms of offering monetary support for the world's biggest economy during the global pandemic.
Trump also said that he had "the right" to fire Powell, but wouldn't do so, instead suggesting he could come the Chairman "into another role" at the Federal Reserve instead.
...
Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 591 U.S. ____ (2020) was a U.S. Supreme Court case which determined that the structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), with a single director who could only be removed from office "for cause", violated the separation of powers. Handed down on June 29, 2020, the Court's 5–4 decision created a new test to determine when Congress may limit the power of the president of the United States to remove an officer of the United States from office.
The Court recognized that the president may generally remove officers at will. However, the Court stated there were two exceptions to this rule. First, the president's removal power may be constrained by Congress if the officer in question is a member of an agency that shares similar characteristics to the Federal Trade Commission as discussed in Humphrey's Executor v. United States (1935). Second, Congress may constrain the president's removal power over "inferior officers with limited duties and no policymaking" role as discussed in Morrison v. Olson (1988). The Court declined to extend the exceptions to "an independent agency led by a single director and vested with significant executive power."
The Court also held that the directorship position was severable from the statute that established the CFPB, allowing the CFPB to continue to operate.
...
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday said it would hear a case that will decide the future of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
The case revolves around the constitutionality of the CFPB’s funding mechanism. After the CFPB issued a payday-lending rule in 2017, industry groups challenged the rule in court, arguing in part that the agency’s funding structure–which draws money from the Federal Reserve rather than annual Congressional appropriations–is unconstitutional. Last fall, the Fifth Circuit federal appeals court rejected most of the trade groups’ arguments against the rule but ruled that the CFPB’s funding structure violates the Constitution’s appropriations clause and separation of powers doctrine.
That decision not only overturned the payday-lending rule and put a legal cloud over every action the CFPB has taken since its launch 12 years ago, it also raised questions about a host of other government agencies and programs that are funded outside the annual Congressional appropriations process, legal experts say.
...
Business mogul and presumed Trump Cabinet appointee Elon Musk called for the elimination of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, in a post Wednesday on social media platform X, which he owns.
“Delete CFPB. There are too many duplicative regulatory agencies,” Musk wrote.
The consumer watchdog, a product of the post-financial crisis Dodd-Frank Act, has long been the subject of Republican ire. Rep. Patrick McHenry, R-NC, ranking member on the House Financial Services Committee, told Director Rohit Chopra in December 2022 that under a Republican-majority Congress, “I think you’ll wish you tried harder to play by the rules.”
Earlier this year, the Supreme Court upheld the CFPB’s funding structure. Challengers took issue with the fact that the CFPB’s funding comes from the Federal Reserve, rather than Congress, but the nation’s highest court found in a 7-2 decision that that did not violate the U.S. Constitution’s separation-of-powers principles.
More than two dozen Republican attorneys general tried to join challengers in their case against the CFPB but were barred by the Supreme Court for undisclosed reasons.
McHenry, at the time, pledged that Republicans would continue the fight “to rein in the rogue CFPB.”
...
It can and should be handled at the state level anyway.DOGE wants to lay off the ‘vast majority’ of CFPB workers, employees say
It’s not totally clear where CFPB data will end up.www.theverge.com
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?