Superconductivity ‘damaged’ as researchers look to move on from retractions

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more. You can visit the forum page to see the list of forum nodes (categories/rooms) for topics.

Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!

searcher

morning
Moderator
Benefactor
Messages
11,979
Reaction score
2,586
Points
238

Superconductivity ‘damaged’ as researchers look to move on from retractions​

“I’m going to introduce a new material for the first time.” So said the condensed-matter physicist Ranga Dias to a packed conference room at the March meeting of the American Physical Society in Las Vegas earlier this year. The material in question was nitrogen-doped lutetium hydride, or Lu-N-H, and Dias went on to describe measurements claiming to have seen evidence for superconductivity at a remarkable 294 K (a balmy 20 °C) under a pressure of 1 GPa (10 kbar).

Based at the University of Rochester in the US, Dias claimed to have observed many signatures of superconductivity such as the electrical resistance dropping to zero at a particular transition temperature and the material expelling magnetic field lines. He and his colleagues also measured the sample’s specific heat, which showed a characteristic response at the transition temperature.

More:

 
Back
Top Bottom