Fussy David Brooks, Virtuous Conservative™ recently authored a New York Times opinion piece that literally calls for an uprising of our privileged “elites” against what he calls “Trumpism.” (I’ll link to the article in my comment post immediately below, as the algorithm hates third party links.)
This article is of a piece that we have seen over and over since 2016 from both the elitist left and the elitist right—i.e., it’s a mish-mash of woebegone self-pity mixed with outright contempt for the unenlightened proletariat as the self-appointed “elite” author struggles to understand why the power of the intelligentsia has slipped away, why the institutions that grew over centuries have failed to garner the respect they once held, and what must be done to restore the status quo.
First of all, it’s impossible to restore that status quo.
The reason why it is impossible is the same reason why the “elites” have watched their power evaporate.
That reason? It’s pretty simple to grasp. It’s called “the Internet.”
I’ll explain.
You see, for thousands of years, the elite members of society who gained power through knowledge did so because that knowledge was SPECIALIZED, and to even have access to that knowledge, one needed to be a member of the guild that was the custodian of that knowledge.
Only physicians had access to the latest medical science. Only attorneys had access to the most recent common law court decisions in their vast legal libraries and, later, Westlaw. Only psychologists had access to the latest understandings of the human mind. Only Medieval literature professors had access to the footnoted versions of Chaucer. Only journalists had access to a printing press and, later, Lexis/Nexis. Only political scientists had access to the forums and journals where their collective theories were formed. Etc. Etc. You get the idea.
To be in the guild meant you had access to the guild’s knowledge, it meant you could BLOCK THAT ACCESS from the non-guild members, and whatever analyses, judgements, recommendations and policies your expert position created was unchallengeable by the unwashed masses because only the guild had access to the knowledge upon which such analyses, judgements, recommendations and policies were made.
But along came the Internet, and all of that knowledge was suddenly available to EVERYONE.
Now don’t get me wrong—you still need medical training to understand most medical literature. You still need to know how Olde English worked to really get Chaucer. Same with being an attorney. I’m one, and it drives me crazy when a client thinks they know the law because they read something online about “piercing the corporate veil” and it makes them think they are an expert on the subject, even though they miss key concepts.
Yet…
What the Internet has done is give the layperson access to the guild’s knowledge at a deep enough level to know WHEN THE GUILD WAS WRONG.
That’s what’s new, at least since the Internet, the WWW and AI became ubiquitous.
The layperson may not understand immunology, but that layperson now has enough knowledge to know how wrong the guild was on COVID.
The layperson may not understand all facets of Russian spydom, but the layperson had enough knowledge to know that the guild was wrong on “Trump/Russia collusion” and Hunter’s laptop.
The layperson may not understand all of the intricacies of criminal law, but the layperson had enough knowledge to know that the guild’s lawfare against Trump was both legally and morally wrong.
Basically, the Internet gave the layperson access to the guild’s knowledge, and with it, the layperson could see JUST HOW WRONG THE GUILD USUALLY WAS.
Which got the layperson thinking: “If they are that wrong now, how do I know they have not been that wrong for centuries??? They probably have been!”
And with THAT, the “elite" status of our self-appointed betters went *POOF*, and it ain’t ever coming back, at least not until EMP puts us back into the Stone Age.
It’s so simple to see, but the guilds still cannot see it: once the average person has access to your knowledge, they will know when you are wrong, and when you lie to them.
The status of a diploma or some initials after your name no longer have the power they once had, and they never will again, thanks to the Internet.
I do not understand why this is so hard for the Fussy David Brooks of the world to understand.