The Missing Original 13th Amendment

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more. You can visit the forum page to see the list of forum nodes (categories/rooms) for topics.

Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!

No Title of Nobility shall be granted”

Slaughter-House cases. 83 U.S. 36., (1872)
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/script...vol=83&page=36

The government cannot take a right from you and give it to another. Part of the case, was New Orleans had set up a large area to slaughter farm animals. This gave the corporation the exclusive right to slaughter all farm animals in the parishes of Orleans, Jefferson, and St. Bernard. And a land owner could not sell animals or produce from his private land.
This is a 5th and 14th Amendment and Article 1 section 10 VIOLATION.
“No Title of Nobility shall be granted”



GIBBONS v. OGDEN, 22 U.S. 1 (1824)
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/script...&vol=22&page=1

The acts of the Legislature of the State of New York, granting to Robert R. Livingston and Robert Fulton the exclusive navigation of all the waters within the jurisdiction of that, with boats moved by fire or steam, for a term of years.

Lakewood v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co,. 486 U.S. 750 (1988)
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/script...l=486&page=750

Here we find another pick and choose as to who will get the favors of the government.

Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising 449 U.S. (1991)
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/script...l=499&page=365

The city fathers wanted to have one sign company to put up all of the signs in the City of Columbia, South Carolina. So this is another loss for the great leaders of our local government. They don’t seem to realize our U. S. Constitution is for equality, and not a buddy system.



Leathers v. Medlock,. 499 U.S. 439 (1991)
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/script...l=499&page=439

Another case of playing favorites. This one is about taxes. It seems that the state of Arkansas wanted to charge Mr. Medlock taxes on his cable television subscribers and not on newspapers and magazines. They all three entertain, give out news, do advertising so they should pay equal taxes. Newspapers and magazines could do good for elected officials.
 
Back
Top Bottom