Trump vs CBS (60 Minutes editing of Kamala interview)

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.

Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!

pmbug

Your Host
Administrator
Benefactor
Messages
17,759
Reaction score
6,450
Points
268
Location
Texas
United-States
Yesterday's Complaint in this case essentially alleges that CBS's editing of the 60 Minutes Harris interview was "false, deceptive, or misleading," and thus a violation of Texas's consumer protection law. But states generally can't impose liability for misleading or even outright false political speech. ...

More:

 
CBS News will provide the Federal Communications Commission with the transcript and camera feeds from a "60 Minutes" interview at the center of a complaint alleging news distortion.

The FCC sent a letter of inquiry on Wednesday demanding the "full, unedited transcript and camera feeds" from an October interview with former Vice President Kamala Harris about her candidacy for president.

"We are working to comply with that inquiry as we are legally compelled to do," CBS News said in a statement.

The Center for American Rights, a conservative law firm, filed the FCC complaint on Oct. 16. It was dismissed on Jan. 16 but was subsequently reopened by newly appointed FCC Chairman Brendan Carr, just days after President Donald Trump took office.

Mr. Trump sued CBS News in a Texas federal court in late October, alleging the network's editing of the Harris interview intentionally misled the public and unfairly disadvantaged him. He's seeking $10 billion in damages.
...

 
These propagandists for Davos Man, need be round up and jailed indefinitely - the precedent has been set. Insurrection, apparently is any speech the present government doesn't like. So let's run with it.

A few executions for Treason would do well, too. And I don't mean the brain-dead suits on cameras. Go right to the top; to CEOs and chief stockholders. That would reduce Larry the Fink and Warren the Buffet to their elements.

I am fresh out of sympathy or even dedication to "justice." Our system is gone; Rule of Law is done.

Now it's might-makes-right and it's time to put paid to the debt they owe the society they killed. I am coming to understand, now, how good men could become part of lynch mobs.
 
Back
Top Bottom