- Messages
- 1,527
- Reaction score
- 2,159
- Points
- 298
Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more. You can visit the forum page to see the list of forum nodes (categories/rooms) for topics.
Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!
Not at all. The water stays the same. Lake Mead is supplied by snow melt and the Mud River. NOTHING ELSE. The amount of water that flows -- and has flowed for eons and since the dam was built has stayed approximately constant.With all these lakes and rivers drying up, one has to ask "where's the water going"? Water doesn't get "used up", it's a cycle.
& Good thing Nestle is trying to buy up and control the entire world's water supply.Good thing Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab are willing to tackle population growth.
It's going north and south to the poles. Bigger ice caps. Because climate change.With all these lakes and rivers drying up, one has to ask "where's the water going"? Water doesn't get "used up", it's a cycle.
With all these lakes and rivers drying up, one has to ask "where's the water going"? Water doesn't get "used up",it's a cycle.
Sorry, but it does in fact recombine when burnt.and don't anyone try to sell me we've got perpetual motion where we burn that hydrogen to move our vehicles and like a miracle, it recombines at the tail pipe
prove it...not just some science guy or military guy who want's you to believe in magic...prove itSorry, but it does in fact recombine when burnt.
To burn something IS to oxidize it.
It is impossible to burn hydrogen without oxidizing it.
....and oxidizing hydrogen creates water.
The loss is in the separation. It takes more energy to break the bonded h2o than one receives when putting it back together.
There would also be some loss after separation due to leakage of hydrogen from pipelines and storage containers.
....but what gets burnt to to propel that Pacer of yours down the street, absolutely would form water. How could it not? It would be being oxidized.
It's no different than how we oxidize carbon in wood and other fuels. Burning it bonds oxygen to the carbon and creates co2.
and can i ask: where is that 'sterile' oxygen and 'sterile' hydrogen being scrubbed clean at?The loss is in the separation. It takes more energy to break the bonded h2o than one receives when putting it back together.
It feels like it's all falling here!With all these lakes and rivers drying up, one has to ask "where's the water going"? Water doesn't get "used up", it's a cycle.
Will this help?malarky, i've mentioned it before...false science is like being a member of a cult
it's like a fish on dry ground...85% is what i know...what is it you've ever fit into the size of a hand? an average sized human who's been cremated...\\Will this help?
Water - hydrogen & oxygen
this right here is a possibility tooIt feels like it's all falling here!
I never said or implied it to be perpetual motion.you're accepting of that perpetual motion thing...so, prove it?
Do you not agree that a water molecule is H2O? Have you ever performed an electrolysis experiment where you use electricity to break the atomic bond betwixt the two hydrogen atoms and the oxygen atom? The gas can be collected and ignited. Afterwards you have water again.and can i ask: where is that 'sterile' oxygen and 'sterile' hydrogen being scrubbed clean at?
and that energy thing...
PROVE IT
malarky, i've mentioned it before...false science is like being a member of a cult
Yes. It's a '74 with a four banger in it.Buck drives a Pacer!?
Buck, what are you smokin, brother?
BF
You've got a conclusion reachedi have no way to prove that any of this is causing what we're experiencing around the globe, EXCEPT that it's happening:
i've mentioned before, the separation of water, to get to that hydrogen is a terrible idea as that water has no place, in nature, on the planet, to re-combine from the two basic elements
and don't anyone try to sell me we've got perpetual motion where we burn that hydrogen to move our vehicles and like a miracle, it recombines at the tail pipe
malarky
technology has a cost...
Thank you for your very informative post, Unca Walt.Not at all. The water stays the same. Lake Mead is supplied by snow melt and the Mud River. NOTHING ELSE. The amount of water that flows -- and has flowed for eons and since the dam was built has stayed approximately constant.
The major cause of Lake Mead going dry is the USE of the water has cascaded upwards without restraint. Snow melt and the Mud River (pretend there is no Lake Mead -- think of the lake as just a deep part of the Mud River) have not significantly changed either way -- flood or drought.
Snow melt and the Mud River cannot supply California. They are growing cotton (a super heavy water use crop) in the desert. They are supplying California and other states as well as Lost Wages and their golf courses in the desert with water from that lake/bathtub. <-- NOT from the snow melt and Mud River, but the LAKE/bathtub.
The change we all see is Man's ever increasing use of the constant, steady flow. Always more and more.
This is what is happening in the Middle East: Population growth, the rise of cities with the concurrent need for ever more water... from a source that has been constant from the dawn of civilization.
The ONLY change is that the Lake Mead/Euphrates bathtubs now have 100 people using them simultaneously.
There -- is your cycle.
You are welcome Zed, when you are full let me know, and we will switch it back to Kentucky. Ta....It feels like it's all falling here!
Mr. King, I am starting to use you as my go to for all things beyond my ken. Thank you so much for your valued and informative post and posts.Sorry, but it does in fact recombine when burnt.
To burn something IS to oxidize it.
It is impossible to burn hydrogen without oxidizing it.
....and oxidizing hydrogen creates water.
The loss is in the separation. It takes more energy to break the bonded h2o than one receives when putting it back together.
There would also be some loss after separation due to leakage of hydrogen from pipelines and storage containers.
....but what gets burnt to to propel that Pacer of yours down the street, absolutely would form water. How could it not? It would be being oxidized.
It's no different than how we oxidize carbon in wood and other fuels. Burning it bonds oxygen to the carbon and creates co2.
To break the numbers down, 96.5% of all the Earth's water is contained within the oceans as salt water, while the remaining 3.5% is freshwater lakes and frozen water locked up in glaciers and the polar ice caps. Of that fresh water, almost all of it takes the form of ice: 69% of it, to be exact. If you could melt all that ice, and the Earth's surface was perfectly smooth, the sea levels would rise to an altitude of 2.7 km.
Aside from the water that exists in ice form, there is also the staggering amount of water that exists beneath the Earth's surface. If you were to gather all the Earth's fresh water together as a single mass (as shown in the image above) it is estimated that it would measure some 1,386 million cubic kilometers (km3) in volume.
Thank you for your far too kind of a response. I am humbled by it.Mr. King, I am starting to use you as my go to for all things beyond my ken. Thank you so much for your valued and informative post and posts.