America Heading Towards a Collapse Worse Than 2008 AND Europe! Says Peter Schiff

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more. You can visit the forum page to see the list of forum nodes (categories/rooms) for topics.

Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!

vox

Predaceous Stink Bug
Messages
124
Reaction score
0
Points
0
http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/brea...ollapse-worse-2008-europe-says-155504860.html

Video on the link above.

His view on PM's is notable. See item #3 below.

Text follows:

 
Very, very scary!
I wish I had started accumulating PMs many years ago.
 
Makes a lot of sense, especially when you look at Europe and when you compare today with 1933. Then compare 1929 and 1934 with 2008 and 2013. The 1934 dump was far worse than the 1929 dump, but no one remembers it. Those who do not learn from history are DOOMED to repeat history.

And Ocare mandates coming online in 2014 will only make it worse, much worse.

The one "positive" thing for stackers is that many people will be dumping hard assets at any price thereby pushing the price of PMs TEMPORARILY down. 2014 or 2015 should see the housing market finally bottom. Anyone with money should be able to buy property dirt cheap, a lot cheaper (in real terms) than today.

There are areas around here that a person can buy a decent older house on a city lot for 50 grand or so, mostly because the econuts have shut down all industry in those areas. Then the housing crisis hit, and what value that was left vanished. Example, in Powers, Oregon there are dozens of vacant houses scattered all over town, many even abandoned by the bank because there are no buyers.

My guess is that PMs and similar hard assets will skyrocket a year or two ahead of the housing market. Anyone with PMs, or other liquid assets, should have no problem buying really decent property for cash.
 
I like Schiff. I think he pats himself on the back a lot about his 2008 predictions, but....he was right. He's a credible guy. Crashproof 2.0 is worth the read for you guys that haven't looked at it yet.
 
My guess is that PMs and similar hard assets will skyrocket a year or two ahead of the housing market

what makes you think that housing will skyrocket again, in any predictable timeframe? In US, there's huge glut of oversupply in houses, demographics is not favorable (population flat/declining), people are more & more on shitty jobs/minimal wages, that would not pay for a flat's mortgage, let alone "skyrocketing" housing prices?

I've came across some quite interesting point of view, in my internet endeavors (on one of NZ financial forums):

Our great debt-based, Ponzi monetary system, was able to continue for decades only for so long, because there were new players entering at the bottom of the pyramid, willing & able to get on more debt, to service previous debts & create some liquidity in the system). Eventually, it all boiled down to rising housing prices - people need to live somewhere. So that poster said, that our monetary system lives and dies by rising housing prices - as the most reliable source of new money lent into existence, against some (very much overvalued) collateral. Which makes me think, that if minions are not able anymore (realistically speaking, even if idiots are still willing) to perpetuate the nonsense of rising housing prices, we might very well be witnessing the end of our monetary system - with all the recent "crises", ever more frequent and violent, being it just kicking the dust.
 
Last edited:
I like Schiff. I think he pats himself on the back a lot about his 2008 predictions, but....he was right. He's a credible guy. Crashproof 2.0 is worth the read for you guys that haven't looked at it yet.

I think he's more than a little frustrated with how those who correctly predicted the crisis are being ignored today. I remember the interviews they had with Schiff and the hordes or realtors/housing reps prior to 07 and all they did was arrogantly bash his views. Imagine being called an idiot for 6-7 years, being right on the money and people aren't willing to give you credit for it.

So yeah.. He kind of does need to mention he was right.. Does he need to do it all the time? Probably not.

Let's also remember that he's all in on the gold trade. He runs Euro pacific capital and it's in his best financial interest to get as many clients with him as possible before crash 2.0. I don't mean that in a negative way either. He's putting his money where his mouth is.
 

This is pretty much what we saw during previous QE periods. Only it wasn't just import prices that rose, but the whole commodity complex (although oil is definitely the most important one with respect to corporate margins).
 
...also consider that Schiff might be taking into account, that each of his interviews might be someone's FIRST time he/she came across him, thus he might want to break through the initial "who the hell this joker thinks he is" attitude of his first-time viewers, by quoting his fulfilled predictions.
 
Schiff is very good.
The only way housing will start to recover & I mean minimaly will be if there's JOBS!!!


GOD BLESS OUR TROOPS!!!
 

Very good point.

The point that Schiff is tooting his own horn repeatedly in order to educate his new readers is probably the main reason he does it. One cannot assume that everyone knows his history when he is constantly getting new readers. So, it makes perfect sense for him to toot his own horn to bring all new readers up to speed. In the past, I had always assumed that doing so was to pump up his ego, but now I see the validity of constantly reiterating that past to inform new readers.

Based on that, I decided to toot my own horn.
 
Last edited:

Vindication is sweet indeed.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…