BoE goes full retard, invents new HIGH RISK qe

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more. You can visit the forum page to see the list of forum nodes (categories/rooms) for topics.

Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!

swissaustrian

Yellow Jacket
Messages
2,049
Reaction score
0
Points
0
"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." - Albert Einstein

Additional debt is the cure for too much debt, that's basicly the mindset of the following post:

In a move that can only be described as INSANE, the Bank of England announced today that they're going to swap (temporarily exchange) credit from commercial banks for cash if these banks maintain or increase levels of their domestic (UK) lending. By doing this, the central bank takes on the default risk that commercial banks face on loans made to customers on the BoE's books. The intention is to lower interest rates and to make loans available to debtors which can't get (low interest) loans in the market, i.e. from private commercial banks. This is exactly the Fannie and Freddy scheme that created the US housing bubble: government agencies create artificially cheap credit for subprime debtors. WHAT COULD POSSIBLY GO WRONG ?
But it is even worse than the US GSEs (government sponsored enterprises = FM+FM) Under this new scheme in the UK, the central bank just prints the money which is then swapped to commercial banks for existing credit, so they can create MORE credit and make money on the interest. You can see the obvious: This stinks like another bank recapitalization scheme . :doodoo:
Additionally, this scheme can NOT be unwound without creating a credit crunch, because no private actor will ever step in and take on the risks on these suprime loans. So the stated goal of preventing a credit crunch will eventually just create a bigger one later thanks to government intervention .

Here's an article by the London Telegraph (includes two videos):
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/...bn-scheme-to-kick-start-stagnant-economy.html
 
Europe is going down. Period, the end. It is no longer a matter of if, if is amatter of how much more of the Peoples cash they throw on the fire before they have their collective epiphany and shut this fucker down.

We may not have to wait for very long. Greece will have their election on Sunday, which is a de-facto referendum on Greek continuing to participate in this grand experiment. Should the left win a clear majority, Spain and Italy soon follow. You cannot recover an economy with a bigger debt. It simply will not work. The banks are going down and there is nothing short of a Europe wide totalitarian dictatorship that can stop it.
 
Spending our way out of debt with borrowed money is not the solution



by Mitch Feierstein 15th June 2012



The United Kingdom has too much debt. Reports normally focus on government debt: currently around 80% of national income, unless you take into account (as you should) the debts of the bailed-out banks and their toxic portfolios, which would pretty much double that figure.
But what about consumer debt? Mortgage debt? Business debt? The huge slabs of debt incurred by our banking system? The truth is, if you want to know how much the United Kingdom owes, you need to add up everything.

And the answer is terrifying. We owe about 500% of GDP. So for every pound you earn in a year, someone, somewhere owes £5. Add it all up and you get to a total just shy of £8 trillion.

Burden: Including bank bailouts, the UK’s national debt is already around 160% of GDP
You don’t have to be a rocket-scientist to figure out that this is a problem. Indeed, you’d have to be living under a stone not to have noticed that our economy has plunged into a depression because of this weight of debt. The banks started it, but we’re all in it together. And it’s not just Britain, it’s Europe too. And the US economy is way more fragile than is sometimes reported.
The dictionary definition of a depression is ‘a sustained, long-term downturn in economic activity in one or more economies. It is a more severe downturn than a recession, which is seen by some economists as part of the modern business cycle.’ That’s us. That’s where we are. The Great Depression of the 1930s did not destroy output to the same degree and recovery was faster. This is the worst depression in British economic history.
And what is the solution to this crisis, as cooked up between George Osborne and Mervyn King, the Bank of England chief?


George Osborne and Mervyn King have announced their intention to make around £100bn of cheap loans available to banks, allowing them to lend to businesses
Answer: more debt! Clearly, these wise souls believe that the whole problem with the British economy is that we don’t have enough debt. So let’s have more. In fact – and how’s this for a plan? – let’s make soft loans at cheap rates to the same klutzy British banks that created this mess in the first place and hope that somehow that sparks off a spiral of investment and innovation. You might as well plan for world peace by selling arms to the Middle East. (Or, come to think of it, making Tony Blair a peace envoy.) It’s the same crazed logic.
Fortunately, though, businesses aren’t stupid. The main barrier to investment isn’t the availability of credit; it’s the dire economy. Businesses are, quite rightly, looking at the devastation and lack of governance around them and thinking this might not be the best possible time to launch new ventures or expand old ones.
And the solution? Well, there isn’t one short of de-leveraging. The only way to a problem of excessive debt is to have less debt. You can’t achieve that by waving a magic wand, you achieve it by working hard, paying down your loans, and remembering that, next time, you better keep your credit card in your pocket when you pass those nice, inviting stores.
But meantime, the plan does reveal something important about the decision-makers in charge of the economy. George Osborne I have some time for: at least he realises he needs to get the government to borrow less; at least he knows that the banks have to be tamed. But Mervyn King: what is he for? We are currently paying him to print money and shovel cheap loans at dodgy banks fueling a property bubble of epic proportion.

Athens burns: Does this look like the creation of aggregate demand, Mr King?
Creating asset bubbles and money printing are terrible policies that King has become addicted to. He’s past his sell by date and has to go.

published in Fridays Daily Mail
 
The end game is occurring more rapidly than I thought was possible. They just don't get it......do they ?

We will all of us, live through some of the hardest and most austere times this nation has ever experienced. The coddled masses here in the USA will not be ready for the financial and social shocks coming our way and many will simply die off. People will believe that whole "We're from the government and we're here to help you line", and they will believe it until it is too late to do anything for themselves. To avert outright panic, programs will be hastily prescribed to "help stave off hunger" and to "insure that no one goes without", yet they will all fail, every single one. By the time people figure out that they need to plant their own food and raise a little livestock like chickens and goats, it will be too late. They will eat their seed stock for lack of nutrition, then they will simply starve to death.

The end game will not be pretty folks, make no mistake about it. As the resident myopist, I have done what I can to prepare myself for everything from urban warfare, roaming gangs from the "golden hordes" to roving groups of racially knit groups of thugs, all the way up to military ground sorties involving our own forces going house to house.

Think it won't happen? Think again my friends, think again.

Keep some of the stash close at hand so it is ready and available, and keep some of it scattered at safe spots. If you have prepared with weapons and ammo, do the same. Make "receipts" for the "sale" of your main battle and self protection weapons, as this may be necessary to avoid arrest in a confiscation scenario, and allow you to still protect yourself and family when even the government can no longer support their own agenda for lack of money.

Now is the lull before the coming storm. Make use of this time to do what you should already have been doing for a long time [I hope]. I live in hurricane central, so we're already on our game, but many of you out there in fly-over territory have been a little more complacent and should redouble your efforts. Remember, food only goes out of date because you are not rotating stock. When the shit hits the fan, you won't be rotating because there will be nothing available to rotate with in the first place. Build a garden and maintain it. Buy up ball jars and lids. Do it and do it now.
 
Last edited:
soooooo ......

if you was 'da government' and fiat money suddenly failed, with the banks all closed,

WHAT WOULD YOU DO ?

Im thinking they would ORDER all citizens to carry on as before and get fuel / food ration systems out as soon as possible ( contingency planning should already have something in place )

Substitute your ration quota for the defunct cash on your existing credit card.
Everything is in place for such a system, just got to make it happen quickly.

OK still pretty disruptive but not impossible to sort.

Once the justintime food / fuel delivery system breaks down, its a very different scenario, so planning should be in place.
(Even the dumbest Gov should have this level of planning in place )

And it only needs to hold things together for a short period while they reboot with a shiny new monetary system. Would expect they've got emergency planning in place for this as well.

A situation like this would obviously not be a seamless transition but it is do-able and as i often contend, if its predictable it shouldnt be a total EOTWAWKI.

Its a black swan event that will do that (-:
 
We will go full-barter in as little as a week my friend. I am ready and will most likely end up being 'white poet warlord' in my sector, because I have planned for Armageddon and am ready for the shit to hit. Those with gasoline will be trading it to me for five pounds of squash and some honey. Those with medicine will be trading it to me for five pounds of goat meat jerky and some eggs. Those with gold and silver will be using it to buy a half dozen jars of tomato sauce and #10 cans of wheat berries to make flour.
 
Last edited:
Im more of a 'plan for the worst and hope for the best' type, Ancona.

Certainly barter will quickly evolve but that only works for a small number of preppers or people with access to 'secure' resources.

Not sure I actually want to live through your version of armageddon but its probably important that some do.

Otherwise, see you all on the other side

( blimey, its getting a bit dark in here ) (-:
 
"May you live in interesting times."
 
Those words ring scary and true Bug. We are indeed in interesting times my friend. Expect them to get even more interesting as shit starts its death spiral.
 
Its a black swan event that will do that (-:
...it is not necessarily a big event, that will bring the shit down. The more I read it, the more I appreciate "Currency Wars" by Rickards. His take on economics is rather that of complex systems (ie nuclear energy, weather, etc.), not the silly models, where wise (not!) men are turning few knobs in the form of interest rates/M1 money supply etc, and doing all the fine-tuning. Few good analogies: the lightning, that starts small local bush fire, and the one, that starts hundreds of acres fire, might be identical. What is different between the two, is the state of the forest, where it stroke. Another one: A single snowflake, that starts the avalanche on an unstable slope, is not substantially different from millions of others, that already fell on that slope - it was just one too many. And once it starts, it starts.

So it happens in complex systems, with their inbuilt tendency to runaway events, when some critical conditions and/or thresholds are met. I think that our own friend Fusor could find some good analogies between nuclear stuff, and that

rblong2us said:
Certainly barter will quickly evolve but that only works for a small number of preppers or people with access to 'secure' resources.
yep, my take on this is, that black market & often barter will always thrive in difficult times. History shows that more often than not, local currency was replaced on the black market with the one, that has been perceived as "strong" - which is easy to be perceived as a "strong" one, if you are competing with Zimbabwe Dollar, on Polish Zloty from the times of our '89 hyperinflation - anything, coming from stable economies would do. People tend to look at the "well-known" safe-heaven alternatives.

Question remains, what will be deemed the "safe-heaven" one, in case of domino-falling fiat currencies worldwide? I tend to think I know the answer today , that's why I am here, learning, sharing and preparing

...BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! this is the quote of the day, thanks SA for that little gem of "eloquent" speak... I again am drawing unhealthy interest of my coworkers, laughing uncontrollably at my monitor - honestly, is that guy a comedian? :rotflmbo:. 'Dear Sirs, our economic situation is grave indeed, it is time for desperate measures.. I recommend this committee to start throwing kitchen sinks, and do not look back twice'. Seriously...! 'We did everything we could, now it is time to get down to business!'... Seriously... I mean, is there a limit to stupidity in the upper echelons of our societies? The guy doesn't even know how to put together one sentence that would not be an obvious nonsense and self-contradiction??? Aaahhh... that really made my day, SA!
 
Last edited:
Seems like the BOE is reeeeeeally scared:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/...e-for-Lehmans-re-run-Bank-official-warns.html
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…