Border security, immigration & deportations

[searcher]

On the flip side............

 

[searcher]

War Department Continues to Encourage Civilians to Augment Homeland Security Border Mission​

https://www.war.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/4431484/war-department-continues-to-encourage-civilians-to-augment-homeland-security-bo/

 

[Goldhedge]

precedent setting case

Guilty verdict reached in first-ever antifa terrorism trial​

By Mia Cathell
Nine suspected members of a Texas antifa cell were found guilty on Friday in the nation’s first-ever federal case to bring terrorism charges against alleged antifa operatives.

Though the convictions varied depending on the defendant, none will be walking free.

The jury trial, which lasted three weeks, was widely seen as a test of the Justice Department’s first courtroom attempt to treat criminal actors who organize behind an antifa ideology as a terrorist group after President Donald Trump designated antifa as a domestic terrorist threat.

Charges and verdict​

The cell’s alleged ringleader, Benjamin Hanil Song, alongside jointly charged co-conspirators Zachary Jared Evetts, Savanna Sue Batten, Maricela Rueda, Elizabeth Andrea Soto, Ines Houston Soto, Daniel Rolando Sanchez-Estrada, Cameron James Arnold, and Bradford Winston Morris, were convicted on a slew of wide-ranging crimes connected to a July 2025 attack on an Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in Alvarado, Texas.

The verdict was mixed, but the defendants were convicted on a majority of the 65 total counts.

Verdict reached in first-ever antifa terrorism trial

Nine suspected members of a Texas antifa cell were found guilty in the nation’s first-ever federal case to bring terrorism charges against alleged antifa operatives.

www.washingtonexaminer.com

 

[searcher]

ICE agents reveal daily arrest quotas and surveillance app in rare court testimony

Under oath, officers said they were told to make eight arrests a day and given special tech to help choose ‘targets’

www.theguardian.com

 

[searcher]

Justices to consider the rights of asylum seekers at the U.S.-Mexico border

The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments next week in a challenge to the government’s policy of systematically turning back asylum seekers before they can reach the U.S. border with […]

www.scotusblog.com

 

[searcher]

 

[Goldhedge]

 

[searcher]

When the Supreme Court let a president get away with redefining birthright citizenship

The president finds the long-settled meaning of the citizenship clause to be an intolerable obstacle to his agenda. The reason? Each year it would make U.S. citizens of tens of […]

www.scotusblog.com

 

[searcher]

Don't judge the vid by the title.

Why Is A Black Ice Agent A Sellout?​

Mar 27, 2026
Bigherc wants them gone.


11:06

 

[Goldhedge]

When the Supreme Court let a president get away with redefining birthright citizenship

The president finds the long-settled meaning of the citizenship clause to be an intolerable obstacle to his agenda. The reason? Each year it would make U.S. citizens of tens of […]

www.scotusblog.com

This was probably the best post you've made so far...! Great history lesson.

Why?

"Even today, the executive branch and Congress continue to label those born in most U.S. territories as “statutory” rather than “14th Amendment” citizens, claiming the power to turn their citizenship on and off at will. Indeed, those born in American Samoa remain citizens of nowhere, labeled instead “non-citizen” U.S. nationals."​

Which tells us something important about how the SCOTUS viewed citizenship in the law back then (though the writer makes it sound like a bad thing).

I'd rather be a US National than a US Citizen. Why? Because the way I understand it, it relieves you of corporate status of the government. You get a different passport that allows one to travel unimpeded. Today we are 'fooled' by education to believe we're all US Citizens. There's even a check box on the 1099 indicating such!

"The nation was deeply divided between “imperialists” like McKinley and his future Vice President Theodore Roosevelt who wanted to keep and govern these islands as colonies, and “anti-imperialists” like author Mark Twain and industrialist Andrew Carnegie who thought becoming a colonial power was incompatible with the constitutional and democratic values of the United States."​

The nation was NOT deeply divided unless you consider the Bankers as being a big section of the population? They assassinated McKinley for a reason. England didn't want to lose it's colony.

I posted this elsewhere, but give this a listen at 1.5x speed. It explains better than I what really went down after 1901.

Britain KILLED The American System. The FED Was Their REWARD
40

 

[searcher]

A war zone, minus the war: One year later, has the military really secured the US-Mexico border?

An investigation into how Trump’s emergency declaration expanded military power, blurred legal lines and helped spread the use of military-grade tech.

www.navytimes.com

 

[Goldhedge]

 

[Casey Jones]

Veddy British, wot-wot?