Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.
Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!
Me, Myself, and I - meaning, the author of this Fake-Nooze dreck.^^^ exactly who are the "three people" referenced?
Not sure, but knowing how things turn out I'm doubting the 'original' story that pushed out in the minutes after the assassination.^^^ exactly who are the "three people" referenced?
That's why I'm wondering if the weapon found is actually the weapon used. Could it be a decoy, left to throw investigators off?Not sure, but knowing how things turn out I'm doubting the 'original' story that pushed out in the minutes after the assassination.
Reminds me of Butler PA...
It was too convenient.
A 30-06 will rip a person's head off. Even if it's deflected it would not make a neat hole while tumbling. The very least there should have been blood splattered all over the back drop.
Keeping an open mind on this....
I watched that terrible video just once and the very second I saw the wound I thought "30/06". Much of what wounding a weapon does is the result of bullet construction, velocity, and the energy it transfers. Ive seen more gun shot wounds then I could count, tho most have been handguns that were used. Ive also been a big game hunter since I was a kid. I own, reload for, and have taken many big game animals with several 30/06's. When Charlie was hit I could actually see the energy of the bullet making shock waves on him.A 30-06 will rip a person's head off. Even if it's deflected it would not make a neat hole while tumbling. The very least there should have been blood splattered all over the back drop.

Of course it isn't. The ones leading these people are all communists.People keep talking this "authoritarian" crap but they can't give examples of how. And I dont want to hear that "illegals" crap. Just the other day they were all screeching "nobody is above the Law" ; Coming into this country illegally is unlawful. Attacking Federal L.E. is unlawful. You dont get to pick and choose. Belonging to an organization that wants to promote rioting and overthrow the Constitution "ANTIFA""BLM" is unlawful. You can't crush Jan 6 protestors and give BurnLootMurder a pass because of your Identity Politics because the Law is supposed to be applied equally.
But it isn't.
This needs to be explored further.Of course it isn't. The ones leading these people are all communists.
Communists don't believe in American principles, at all.
Time we all stop acting as though they do, as they believe the opposite.
Could be that he/she/it was involved and that letter under the keyboard wasn't believed by the law??I heard that Twigs has disappeared.
Analysis Solves Kirk Case—Evidence Points Away From Robinson’s Position
69
I don't know what to make of that.A.) Erika Kirk saw Charlie Kirk and never knew of him, she was just a 32 year old good looking nobody, and fell in love at first sight?
B.) Erik Kirk was a handler, who had intelligence training via the CIA/Mossad from the time she was a teen. Her father was in charge of Raytheon's Israel division, her mother is the CEO of E3Tek in the Department of Defense, they're both ultra-zionists who have given money to Israel, Erika is involved with modeling from the age of 16 (a known honeypot recruitment center), by 17 she is the CEO of "Romanian Angeles", a non-profit that works with the U.S. military for vulnerable and needy children in Romania. The non-profit ends up getting shut down in 2015 because Romanians and locals are complaining that children are going missing so they're ran out of Romania. Erika ends up working for Trumps modeling agency (we already know Epstein was stealing girls from Trump), and Erika goes on to win Mrs. Arizona, then she begins to work for a real-estate company that has direct sales to Epstein (NY apartment), and she is introduced to Charlie Kirk, after she is "looking for a job", an ambitious young man who is one of the GOP's bag men. So tell me, which is more likely? She just met him out of nowhere, or she was groomed to do exactly what she is now doing and that's why everything sounds scripted, sounds fake, and she always looks like she's acting. She became the CEO of TPUSA right as Charlie begins to be weird about Israel?
Very interesting stuff. The FBI never would, but the Feds should be looking through all her emails, texts, and correspondences from top to bottom. This is how politics work, there are no coincidences.
Go research all this yourself if you don't believe me—It's all out there for anyone who wants to know. Don't let your emotions overcome your critical thinking, none of this has been normal since he was assassinated two weeks ago.
You don't "forgive" the alleged killer who publicly executed your children's father 9 days after it happened, when you're not even fucking certain it was him and the case is just 10 days old.
Use your brains people.