This post may contain affiliate links for which PM Bug gold and silver discussion forum may be compensated.
Deal: Clearance Android Smart Watch on Amazon
- Thread starter nickndfl
- Start date
Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums
Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.
Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!
From what I gathered, this connects to your smart phone via Bluetooth.
I wonder what the Bluetooth connectivity range is. If I go jogging on the local junior high school's 1/4 mile running track, I usually set my phone down by a bench rather than carry it.
...
Internets tells me:
I wonder what the Bluetooth connectivity range is. If I go jogging on the local junior high school's 1/4 mile running track, I usually set my phone down by a bench rather than carry it.
...
Internets tells me:
So as to whether or not it would work for my track runs, the answer appears to be a solid "maybe".
Leave the phone in the middle of the field.
Viking
Yellow Jacket
You keep friends that own Androids?
I used an Apple II back in 1980, but have been strictly Windows and Android since. I was never much of an Apple fan, although I have owned the stock in the past.
I figure for $20 for the above mentioned watch is pretty cheap. The band is basic rubber, but the watch is decent. Face it, most people are not power users of smart watches, but use them for the occasional convenience. The primary is either a phone, tablet or laptop. The 2" size makes it easier to read and the cost is low investment.
I figure for $20 for the above mentioned watch is pretty cheap. The band is basic rubber, but the watch is decent. Face it, most people are not power users of smart watches, but use them for the occasional convenience. The primary is either a phone, tablet or laptop. The 2" size makes it easier to read and the cost is low investment.
- Messages
- 21,523
- Reaction score
- 12,324
- Points
- 288
I used to set up and repair PC's in the schools.
Today I use a Mac Air for that reason. I no longer have to 'fix' computers!
It's a great architecture! The iPhone and Mac work together seamlessly. Photos taken on the iPhone automatically land on the Mac.
The Apple Watch is in reality a medical device. Takes my O2 and EKG readings. Asks me if I want to record the walk/run/workout I'm on if I forget to turn it on. I'm probably not using either to it's full potential!
It also keeps time!
Today I use a Mac Air for that reason. I no longer have to 'fix' computers!
It's a great architecture! The iPhone and Mac work together seamlessly. Photos taken on the iPhone automatically land on the Mac.
The Apple Watch is in reality a medical device. Takes my O2 and EKG readings. Asks me if I want to record the walk/run/workout I'm on if I forget to turn it on. I'm probably not using either to it's full potential!
It also keeps time!
I spent a few years in tech support, and yes, Macs were much less prone to trouble than the PCs were. But you could tinker with PCs and you couldn't with Macs.
That was because Intel x86 is an open architecture design while Apple controls both hardware & software.
Standard x86 architectures is an open motherboard design, where a manufacturer can design the motherboard, and the user can add memory, graphics cards, interface cards, processor or other widgets.
Apple sells the complete computer, manufactured by them with memory, processor and graphics on board and not able to upgrade.
x86 operating systems and programs are a wild west show: anyone can write software for that hardware system
Apple controls both the hardware and software in a closed loop.
So while Macs came working rite outta the box, you had to mess with PCs to get them set up and forever afterwards to keep em running. Macs only dealt with OS updates and the need to replace every Mac on the floor (about 25 or 30) when it was time for a new model.
BUT… the plethora of programs for Windoze was easily 100 times those available on the Mac.
And Mac's invulnerability to viruses was not true. Who wants to write a virus to attack 15% of the world's computers? Better spend your time on the 75% used by most everyone else.
That was because Intel x86 is an open architecture design while Apple controls both hardware & software.
Standard x86 architectures is an open motherboard design, where a manufacturer can design the motherboard, and the user can add memory, graphics cards, interface cards, processor or other widgets.
Apple sells the complete computer, manufactured by them with memory, processor and graphics on board and not able to upgrade.
x86 operating systems and programs are a wild west show: anyone can write software for that hardware system
Apple controls both the hardware and software in a closed loop.
So while Macs came working rite outta the box, you had to mess with PCs to get them set up and forever afterwards to keep em running. Macs only dealt with OS updates and the need to replace every Mac on the floor (about 25 or 30) when it was time for a new model.
BUT… the plethora of programs for Windoze was easily 100 times those available on the Mac.
And Mac's invulnerability to viruses was not true. Who wants to write a virus to attack 15% of the world's computers? Better spend your time on the 75% used by most everyone else.