Gold miner's all-in sustaining costs (AISC)

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.

Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!

pmbug

Your Host
Administrator
Benefactor
Messages
18,582
Reaction score
6,935
Points
268
Location
Texas
United-States
The gold price climbed steadily upwards, trading above US$2,600/oz by quarter end. AISC also continued to rise, up 4% q/q and 9% y/y, to US$1,456/oz, the highest point in our data series back to Q1’10. Lower production, compounded by higher royalty payments and increased sustaining capital expenditures, all helped to drive up AISC. On a regional basis, some differences began to emerge. Africa, Oceania and South America realised the most notable increases, but in North America the rate of growth was much lower, highlighting a mixed scenario for the quarter.
...
While the continual rise in AISC may be of concern, it is important to note that 97% of primary gold production in Q3’24 was profitable ...

More:

What gold miner isn't profitable when all-in costs are (on average) about half of the sell price? :paperbag:
 
Back
Top Bottom