Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.
Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!
Only possible issue I see is that your system is based upon the spot/futures market and it may not accurately reflect premiums in the physical market. I understand that data for physical market prices isn't readily available for a similar analysis, but the premiums over spot could be a significant factor when comparing.
Mish is swapping out* gold for silver:
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2012/05/im-swapping-some-gold-for-silver.html
* not physical in hand; account at Goldmoney
...
1) Silver is trading for 3-4 dollars below its 200 day moving average; Selling after a drop is a classic way to kill your portfolio
...
He's selling gold and *buying* silver. Article at link talks about how he did the reverse - sold silver and bought gold - one year ago before the May silver smash.
Benjamin, I have a take on your basic theory. "during times the money supply is increasing" needs a better definition, I think. Trying not to be OT and long both here, but it's germane I think to the whole PM vs fiat (whichever PM) issue. Personally, I'm doing gold, not silver just now, FWIW.
Need to coin a term here - perhaps "effective money supply", not just total bucks.
In my own view, effective money supply has some components required to get a good number. For example, the ratio of available money (fiat) to goods and services. If that ratio goes up, effective money supply increases. This means that even in the absence of actual printing, EMS can go up if goods and services go down.
And vice versa - if goods and services go up, with no money printing, it's deflationary. And if goods and services go down...even without printing, it's inflationary, as the same money is chasing less stuff.
I'm sure we could make further adjustments to EMS via the various M's used to describe money availability, flow rates and so on, but the basic assumption I'd like to add here is that EMS has more than one input. This appears to confuse the simpler minded among us (mostly not we here, but...). I didn't think of it myself, BTW, this concept was used by K Galbraith (yeah, a leftie) to justify a certain amount of deficit spending and printing when goods and services were increasing just to "stay even" in the inflationary sense, and to argue that not all government debt is bad - only most of it.
I pretty much just consider the gold/silver ratio. Compare it to historic levels, and go from there.
Comparatively speaking, silver is the better buy right now at about 54:1.
Ratios can stay extreme.
I don't like the idea of selling a stack and replacing it because of the premium you lose and then have to repay for when buying. It's more than a "commission". It also puts you in a mindset that your silver and gold can part ways with you. During times like this, I think that is the wrong mindset.
There will be a time where speculation will be rampant and it will be prudent to take some off the table. We aren't there yet.
Happy news for those of us who like PM diversification!
Today I was able to buy a 1 oz Pt Eagle, and I paid slightly less than than for 1 oz Gold Eagle (even w/ the high premium for Pt).
I saw the other day that tulving.com now has Pt Eagles!
My lucky day!
Stack, stack, stack. Even if "poco a poco", it adds up. Faith, babez!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?