Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.
Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!
On the first day of strikes alone, U.S.-led forces launched 112 long-range Tomahawk cruise missiles, which cost about $1 million to $1.5 million apiece, from ships stationed off the Libyan coast. That totals $112 million to $168 million for the first day's missile strikes alone. Since the first strikes, U.S. and British forces have launched at least another 12 Tomahawk missiles.
...
The latest annual figures reveal that in 2010 over 487 million ounces of silver were used for industrial applications, 167 million ounces were used by the jewelry market, over 50 million ounces producing silverware and over 10 million ounces in minting coins and producing medals.
...
...
On a different tangent...there is this so called notion that in the past several years there has been a SURPLUS OF SILVER. The GFMS- World Silver Survey is the one that comes up with these figures. The reason why we have had a so called LARGER SURPLUS is due to taking COIN & MEDAL out of the Fabrication figures. The coin & medal figure is included in the total fabrication number, but they have decided to take it out.
GFMS Calculation for Deficit-Surplus Silver:
Mine Production +Scrap - Fabrication (plus Coin & Medals) = Deficit-Surplus
Here is the 2010 figures:
735.9 mil + 215 mil - 878 + 101.3 = 174.2 million surplus
---------------------------------------------------------------
GMFS believes that coin & medal count as new bullion demand. So the higher the amount of silver that goes into COIN & MEDAL acutally adds to the so called surplus. Silly isn't it? Most of this coin production is from Govt mints making Eagles, Maples, Philharmonics, Pandas, Kookaburras and etc. Most people who own these are not going to sell them for melt.
So, 101.3 million ounces worth of coin and medal in 2010 accounted for 58% of the so called surplus. This year in the 2011 Interim Silver Market Report, GFMS says that coin & medal demand will increase 25 million. That would give us a ballpark of about 126 million ounces to coin & medals. This will be added to increase the surplus in 2011.
Also, the Scrap silver which comes from recycling industrial silver is part of the Supply. Why does GFMS not take this out as it is also a form of bullion... scrap maybe, but supply that does come back into the market. Interesting...
GFMS STATES GLOBAL SILVER PRODUCTION WILL RISE IN 2011
I had an email exchange with Oliver Heathman, metals analyst at GFMS and they believe global silver production with increase 30 million ounces in 2011 or 4% above last year. In my research I thought we would see a decline in 2011 and I have posted a few comments here to that effect. Australia, Peru, Chile and the United States will come in lower, but Mexico, Russia, and China are higher.
GFMS's 2010 Interim Silver Market Report showed a higher global silver production in 2010 than its final report. I believe they will be wrong by at least 15 million. Anyhow, I wrote that article Peak Silver Revisited: Impacts of a Global Depression, Declining Ore Grades & a Falling EROI, where I believe we are going to see a peak in silver soon.
Anyhow, this so called surplus is really a joke when you figure just how little silver the world owns.
Lastly, when we had a deficit in silver, we also had LOW SILVER PRICES. As this so called silver surplus went higher, so did the price of silver. REASON? It was investment demand that pushed the price higher, not industrial demand. This will be the very reason why we see much higher silver prices when the system implodes.
... I checked out those charts and have to say the first one [edit: he means the chart in the OP of this thread] does not make sense. If we go to the silver institute's supply/demand page we see that industrial applications alone accounted for 487.4 million ounces of silver. Then they have the following:
Photography = 72.7
Jewelry = 167.0
Silverware = 50.3
Coins & Medals = 101.
---------------------------------------
then on the bottom of their chart they have what is termed IMPLIED NET INVESTMENT at 178.0 million ounces. If we were to add this plus Coin & medals we would get 279.3 million ounces. I don't know how GFMS who was sighted on the bottom of that chart stated that investment demand is higher when their own figures show otherwise.
If the first chart you linked was included jewelry and silver ware as investment rather than fabrication demand it would turn out to be this:
279.3 + 167 + 50.3 = 496.6 million
Compare that with plain on Industrial Application at 487.4 million ounces and we still can't get to that 55% investment demand figure. Now, there could be more demand of silver above and beyond what is show in NET IMPLIED INVESTMENT DEMAND. I have read several articles about this.
In the end...who the hells knows. I am surprised GFMS is listed as a source on that chart when we can see their information on the silver institute refutes this.
I guess the best we can do is buy and hold physical silver and gold and watch the GRAND FIAT MONEY SYSTEM IMPLODE at a safe distance from us. We will know it's time when the FIAT PHAT LADY SINGS...
The world is about to peak in global silver production. This will not occur due to a lack of silver to mine, but rather as a result of the peaking of world energy resources, declining ore grades, and a falling Energy Returned On Invested – EROI. The information below will describe a future world that very few have forecasted and even less are prepared. This is an update to myprevious article Peak Silver and Mining by a Falling EROI. In my first article I stated that global silver production may peak in 2009 if we were to enter a worldwide depression. We did not have the global depression as massive central bank printing and bailouts have thus far postponed the inevitable.
...
One of the fastest growing industrial uses for silver is in solar panels - an industry that government has chosen to subsidize and support (for now at least). I would think that, plus "loony survivalists"* looking for off grid power solutions, should provide some support for industrial demand.
*looks in mirror
The video cites an article posted by SRSrocco on ZH.
Well, after hearing him quote the numbers, I thought it would be interesting to plot the four data points ...
Where did you see those four data points?
The Frisco mine later named the HORN SILVER MINE, was founded in 1875 ...
...
The most interesting part of researching the Horn Silver Mine in Frisco was finding out the tremendously high silver ore grades they were mining. When the mine first opened they were producing silver at a staggering 1,608 grams per ton (51.7 oz per ton). We must remember, at this time, the United States was figuring these ore grades by short tons or 2,000 pounds. The industry standard today is metric tonnes or 2,205 pounds. Thus, the earlier figures were 10% lower than the grades today. If we add that 10% to this figure we see that compared to present mining ore grades it would have been 56.8 ounces per metric tonne — or 1,769 grams per tonne.
Visiting the mine in person, gave me the inspiration to write this article. I looked at several present silver mines and decided to compare the Horn Silver Mine with First Majestic. The chart below gives the STARK COMPARISON of how times have changed in 100 years.
...
Silver prices last Friday hit a new 19-month low as both industrial and investment demand for the precious metal has slowed.
... The recent decision by the Federal Reserve to not pursue aggressive stimulus measures ...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?