Iran
- Thread starter Goldhedge
- Start date
Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums
Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.
Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!
- Messages
- 1,989
- Reaction score
- 2,364
- Points
- 283
And we in the west are to dumb to realize they had this capability and didn't bother using it, not even now. However, it is now on the table since we have gone in and decided to destroy their country. Before this there is no way Russia and especially China would allow Iran to attack anyone with nukes.
Look at the missile accuracy of Iran, not much a leap to think they could have easily (or with a little help) built a nuke. But they didn't because they didn't want to.
I keep seeing stories about them being the #1 sponsor of terrorism as well. All the funding coming from them. Yet no-one talks about the more than 2 billion a year the US gives the Taliban and Al Qaeda. I think that puts Iran in the #2 spot.
Let's go even deeper.
Iraq. We tried to blame them for 9/11 with 0 evidence. Then it was WMD' again with no evidence
Syria, no idea WTF we were doing there
Afghanistan. Other than securing the poppies not much accomplished.
Libya, got rid of Kadaffi which left a power vacuum and the place is still in shambles
And now Iran. Again, no evidence of any nuclear program other than enriching uranium. Even so, who is the US or any other country to decide who can and cant have nukes? I imagine if they did have one that could reach anywhere in the world they probably wouldn't be getting hammered right now.
So the #2 sponsor of terrorism wants the US out of the Middle East. Based on the above it seems like a reasonable request.
As for service members getting harmed in the past, would those same service members have gotten harmed if the US military stayed on US soil and protected US?
Oh but then we get the argument that the US is just protecting US interests. The oil. Except trump has come out and said repeatedly over the last week that the US doesn't need oil from the ME because we produce enough of our own.
So there has been how many invasions of other countries over there now and we destroy everything in every one of them but Iran is the terrorists?
- Messages
- 1,989
- Reaction score
- 2,364
- Points
- 283
The US and Israel hit Irans nuclear facility today. Of course Iran responded and dropped a missile close to Israels nuclear facility.
This thing is going to spiral out of control. Russia and China both have already warned about it.
When Martin said the war cycle ramps up this year, he wasn't kidding.
This thing is going to spiral out of control. Russia and China both have already warned about it.
When Martin said the war cycle ramps up this year, he wasn't kidding.
They don't have to, they got us for dirty work...
Are the Iranians really the terrorist masterminds the US and Israeli media claim? The Israelis are masters of the false flag attack, The King David hotel, the Lavon affair, and the USS Liberty being famous examples. It could be argued that the US is a sponsor of terrorism, bombing weddings, funerals, SOP second strikes to kill first responders, and of course famously claimed the murder of half a million Iraqi children was "worth it". I don't think the Iranians are saints, but the western definition of terrorist seems to hinge largely on opposition to Zionism.
As for the Turks, they are keenly aware that Israel has threatened them as being next after Iran.
I agree that The City of London is certainly not full of good guys. Interestingly, it is dominated by Zionist Jews. There is a lot going on under the surface that we do not have information on. My best guess is two or more factions of The Powers That Be are fighting for control. Unfortunately for us, I suspect it is unlikely that any of those factions are good guys. But what do I know?
That would make more sense if Iran started the war.
- Messages
- 1,989
- Reaction score
- 2,364
- Points
- 283
- Messages
- 1,989
- Reaction score
- 2,364
- Points
- 283
Viking
Yellow Jacket
Or McDonald's and GMO food. Goyslop™
- Messages
- 1,989
- Reaction score
- 2,364
- Points
- 283
- Messages
- 38,472
- Reaction score
- 6,611
- Points
- 288
Just posting as interesting reading. As with anything I post, dyodd.
King David Hotel bombing - Wikipedia
Lavon Affair - Wikipedia
USS Liberty incident - Wikipedia
USS L.V.A. | Never Forget USS Liberty | June 8 1967
Learn the true story of USS Liberty's 1967 attack, honor the 34 fallen, and support veterans. Discover resources, events, and ways to get involved in preserving this historic legacy.
ussliberty.org
- Messages
- 1,989
- Reaction score
- 2,364
- Points
- 283
There's tons of evidence that we are funding terrorists and way more than Iran.
We will find out how good a job we did when we invade, this talking reminds me of how we absolutely crushed Japanese defenses on Iwo Jima, Tarawa, Betio Island just to name a few, only to find out the Japs were still waiting. Notice the cowardly israelis will not be taking the lead...
- Messages
- 20,165
- Reaction score
- 11,835
- Points
- 288
You know what's funny though?
Democrats controlled the House, the Senate, and the White House and somehow you never eliminated hunger for a decade.
But you know what did get funded??
>$6 billion to Iran.
>Gender studies programs in Pakistan.
>DEI coordinators at every federal agency.
>87,000 new IRS agents.
>A $400 million embassy in Kabul that we abandoned.
>NGOs that can't account for where the money went.
>Ukraine aid with zero audit trail.
>COVID contracts to companies that didn't exist.
>PPP loans to people who didn't have employees.
USAID spent years shoveling money into programs nobody approved, nobody tracked, and nobody could explain.
So before you post about hungry people...
Maybe ask yourself why YOUR party that ran on feeding them has been in power for decades in every major American city...
...and those cities have the highest poverty, the worst schools, and the most homeless people in the country
You can be against the war, you can make that case.
But you don't get to pretend the alternative was EVER the hungry children.
The Democrats were never sending money to them.
It was NEVER going to the veterans.
It was NEVER going to the schools.
You didn't forget the poor.
YOU NEED them TO WIN.
A problem solved is a fundraising opportunity lost... that's why it's never fixed.
That's why and we all know it.