Iran
- Thread starter Goldhedge
- Start date
Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums
Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.
Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!
- Messages
- 40,295
- Reaction score
- 6,940
- Points
- 288
April 28, 2026: Iran War Maritime Intelligence Daily
Strait of Hormuz transit holds at 13 crossings with limited dark activity, Gulf traffic declines to 896 vessels, and Iranian crude flows to Asia drop sharply.
windward.ai
Viking
Yellow Jacket
- Messages
- 20,917
- Reaction score
- 12,091
- Points
- 288
BEGGING: King Charles Visits Trump — DOJ Strikes Comey and Iran Falls the Same Day
Barbara Boyd frames Tuesday as a major display of power by Donald Trump, highlighting three “inflection points”: King Charles’ visit, new DOJ actions, and Iran’s economic unraveling. She argues the White House ceremony masked a struggle over the “special relationship,” citing FDR’s anti-colonial demands and interpreting Trump’s beehive visit as signaling America as the new “master,” while Charles’ address to Congress is portrayed as a subtle critique of Trump via references to checks and balances, NATO, Ukraine, and environmental themes. Boyd then details DOJ moves: an indictment of Jim Comey over his May 2025 “86 47” seashell message, an indictment of Fauci aide David Morens for an alleged Wuhan lab cover-up, and federal raids targeting large-scale entitlement and loan fraud she links to Democratic networks. Finally, she cites Trump’s claim that Iran is collapsing under oil and Treasury pressure, alongside the UAE leaving OPEC and shifts in global oil shipping and insurance.00:00 The Midweek Update - BEGGING: King Charles Visits Trump — DOJ Strikes Comey and Iran Falls the Same Day - April 29, 2026
01:28 King Charles Comes Begging
05:40 Real Justice Comes Roaring Forth
09:16 Iran Collapses and the Empire's Oil Cartel Cracks
- Messages
- 20,917
- Reaction score
- 12,091
- Points
- 288
The hidden hand...
As the U.S. takes a more aggressive posture toward Iran—through sanctions, economic pressure, and strategic positioning—some observers argue this approach could disrupt energy markets and maritime trade routes that have traditionally benefited financial institutions in London. The ripple effects of Middle East instability, particularly involving oil flows and the Strait of Hormuz, may be placing additional strain on European economies, raising questions about how global power is being reshaped.
The United Kingdom’s more cautious stance during this period has also drawn attention. With limited direct involvement in the Iran conflict, some see this as a sign of restraint, while others interpret it as reduced influence or strategic hesitation. King Charles’ decision to engage diplomatically with Trump has fueled debate over whether the UK is seeking to strengthen ties with the United States amid changing global realities.
Trump’s tone toward the King—marked by public praise and diplomacy despite prior criticism of UK policies on immigration, free speech, NATO contributions, and Russia—has added another layer of intrigue. Some view this as strategic diplomacy, blending pressure with partnership to maintain leverage.
Meanwhile, domestic political narratives continue to shape public perception, with ongoing debates about media coverage, foreign policy priorities, and the broader implications of U.S. leadership on the world stage as global alliances evolve.
No One Has A CLUE What Trump Just Did To King Charles
President Trump’s recent interaction with King Charles has sparked intense speculation about shifting global power dynamics, U.S.–UK relations, and the broader geopolitical impact of escalating tensions with Iran. Analysts like Susan Kokinda of Promethean Action suggest Trump’s strategy may be aimed at weakening long-standing financial and political influence tied to London, including pressure on global banking systems, insurance markets, and legacy alliances historically associated with British power.As the U.S. takes a more aggressive posture toward Iran—through sanctions, economic pressure, and strategic positioning—some observers argue this approach could disrupt energy markets and maritime trade routes that have traditionally benefited financial institutions in London. The ripple effects of Middle East instability, particularly involving oil flows and the Strait of Hormuz, may be placing additional strain on European economies, raising questions about how global power is being reshaped.
The United Kingdom’s more cautious stance during this period has also drawn attention. With limited direct involvement in the Iran conflict, some see this as a sign of restraint, while others interpret it as reduced influence or strategic hesitation. King Charles’ decision to engage diplomatically with Trump has fueled debate over whether the UK is seeking to strengthen ties with the United States amid changing global realities.
Trump’s tone toward the King—marked by public praise and diplomacy despite prior criticism of UK policies on immigration, free speech, NATO contributions, and Russia—has added another layer of intrigue. Some view this as strategic diplomacy, blending pressure with partnership to maintain leverage.
Meanwhile, domestic political narratives continue to shape public perception, with ongoing debates about media coverage, foreign policy priorities, and the broader implications of U.S. leadership on the world stage as global alliances evolve.
- Messages
- 40,295
- Reaction score
- 6,940
- Points
- 288
US war in Iran has cost $25 billion so far, says Pentagon official
WASHINGTON, April 29 (Reuters) - The United States' war in Iran has cost $25 billion so far, a senior Pentagon official said on Wednesday, providing the first official estimate of the military's price tag for the conflict.With just six months before mid-term elections in which Trump's Republicans may face an uphill battle to keep their House majority, Democrats are riding high in public opinion polls as they attempt to link the unpopular Iran war with affordability.
More:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/worl...entagon-official/ar-AA220FWC?ocid=socialshare
- Messages
- 20,917
- Reaction score
- 12,091
- Points
- 288
The UAE didn't just leave OPEC, it sent a clear message to Saudi, Russia, and Iran, simultaneously.The UAE had invested billions in spare production capacity it was never allowed to use because Saudi-driven quota cuts kept getting in the way.
After years of frustration, they’d finally had enough.
But the timing reveals the real story, UAE-Saudi relations have been deteriorating for years. And Saudi’s conspicuously muted response to Iranian missiles hitting UAE cities was, apparently, the final straw.
Ditching OPEC+ also just so happens to reduce Russia's influence over global oil markets, at exactly the moment Moscow is backing Tehran.
There is also a compelling theory that the U.S. Treasury's decision to provide the UAE with a dollar swap line days before the announcement was not a coincidence…
The Trump admin desperately wants lower oil prices heading into the midterms, and the UAE being able to pump at full capacity helps achieve that.
For OPEC, the long-term implications are serious:
Cheating on quotas was already rife before, every Gulf country is now desperate to recoup war losses, Russia needs every petrodollar for Ukraine, and smaller members will increasingly ask what the point is of being bossed around by Riyadh.
Qatar left in 2019, Ecuador in 2020, Angola in 2024, and now the UAE in 2026.
The cartel that quadrupled oil prices in 1973 and reshaped the global economy may now be collapsing from within.
Source: TLDR News Global YT
I'm willing to bet much much more than that....
- Messages
- 2,091
- Reaction score
- 2,510
- Points
- 283