Irrational numbers, physics and quantum computing

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a community supported watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.

Register a free account to join the discussions. When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including access to market data/charts and additional members only rooms (including one for trade/barter with the community).

pmbug

Your Host
Administrator
Benefactor
Messages
21,484
Reaction score
9,054
Points
268
Location
Texas
United-States
Quantum mechanics works perfectly in experiments, but Oxford physicist Tim Palmer argues it rests on a mathematical fiction: building the theory on the continuum of real numbers, including irrational numbers like √2. Palmer’s radical alternative abandons the continuum of real numbers and eliminates quantum mysteries that aren't actually physical—from Schrödinger's cat, to Einstein’s “spooky action at a distance.” The theory makes a testable prediction: quantum computers will fail beyond 400 qubits, hitting a fundamental limit set by the discrete structure of nature itself. The coming quantum computing race will determine whether Palmer has identified a basic mistake in our most successful theory.
...

More:

 
Back
Top Bottom