January 6 Insurrection

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.

Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!



Man... I keep going over this in my head...

I listened carefully to what the Justices were saying in the Trump Immunity hearing...

I think/understand they are reading/referring to the Jack Smith indictment as Trump's lawyers argued that his efforts to "overturn" the 2020 election were “official acts” taken in office.

I wonder if any of the Justices did any independent research ( apart from their clerks ) even out of curiosity, as to the REAL evidence as to the theft of the 2020 Election.

They brought up again 60 courts denied there was election fraud- that is NOT TRUE- the weak, feckless, fearful Judges never HEARD the cases, they hid behind, NO STANDING, Latches, too early to show harm, to late to correct the harm and a whole slew of other happy horseshit.

They seem to take it as FACT that Trump "interfered" rather than there was in FACT serious Election Fraud in several key ways ( no signature match, States not following their state laws. mail in ballots, Ballot mules, ( don't even get me started on that utter LYING FRAUD Ruby Freidman and Shay Moss), presentations to Judges on how easy it was to manipulate votes on the voter machines, without a trace and last but no t least- " Trump won't win I made fucking sure of it " Dominion head Eric Coomer.

This was the basis on WHY Trump was challenging the 2020 Election. Any SANE rational person would have done the same thing.

The Commander in Chief of the United States of America has a DUTY to insure a fraud free FAIR election.

Soooooooo again, HOW IS THIS INTERFERENCE???if

If the PREMISE in WRONG the CONCLUSION is wrong.

Am I the only one seeing this ??? 🤷‍♀️🤷‍♀️🤷‍♀️🤷‍♀️
 
What if you were falsely accused of a crime, and you pay a lawyer to defend you. And then the prosecutor claims that you are obstructing the judicial system by hiring someone who will "obstruct" their path on your destruction.

The other details are good. Didn't we condemn Stalin in our history class? Who wants to repeat the history of tyrants?
 

ASYMMETRIC WARFARE: THE JAN 6TH COUP FULLY EXPOSED​

Major Matt Gary returns to SGT Report to shine the light of truth on the 2020 COUP which culminated in the betrayal of America in the people's house on January 6th when the traitors in DC voted to certify a stolen election. And then Pelosi, the demonrats, RINOs and mockingbird whore media blamed Trump and the people in the ultimate gas lighting act of treachery.
60
 
^^^^^

Supreme Court narrows application of obstruction statute used in January 6 case​

Jun 28, 2024


3:02
 
Someone_else said:
Didn't we condemn Stalin in our history class? Who wants to repeat the history of tyrants?
Click to expand...
Democrats do.

searcher said:
apnews.com

Supreme Court makes it harder to charge Capitol riot defendants with obstruction, charge Trump faces

Attorney General Merrick Garland says he's disappointed the Supreme Court has made it harder to charge Capitol riot defendants with obstruction.
apnews.com apnews.com
Click to expand...
That's another one you should post in the Good News thread.

You're on a roll today with good news, Search. Great job!
 
Joe King said:
You're on a roll today with good news, Search. Great job!
Click to expand...

All credit should go to the supremes. Come Monday you may be ecstatic if they do what I think they're going to do.
 
Joe King said:
Why shouldn't they? If Trump loses immunity, so does every other potus.
Click to expand...

I want to see Trump tried by a jury for Jan 6th. And not just him. Every congress critter, every lawyer who was involved should be tried by a jury. And let the chips fall where they may.

No other president in the history of the United States did what Trump did. Some may not have liked the end results of an election but they either accepted the results or a court decision and moved on peacefully. Not Trump. He literally plotted to overthrow the government by overturning a legitimate election through lies, fake electors, rioters invading the capital and a host of other illegal doings. I simply want to see everyone involved held accountable.
 
searcher said:
No other president in the history of the United States did what Trump did.
Click to expand...
What exactly did he do? I heard him repeatedly tell people to be peaceful and patriotic. What did you hear him say?
 
Joe King said:
What did you hear him say?
Click to expand...

Proud boys stand back and stand by............this was a dog whistle to help him in his attempt to overthrow the government.

Had he simply accepted the court's rulings that the election wasn't fake he could have left office with honor instead of a disgraced, anti-American dictator wanna be. He could have taken some time off, hit the talk-show circuit, gave a few speeches, wrote a book and decided whether or not to continue in politics like every president before him did.

Now look at all the charges he's facing. He did this to himself..........with Jan 6th.
 
searcher said:
Proud boys stand back and stand by............this was a dog whistle to help him in his attempt to overthrow the government.
Click to expand...
Everything your side doesn't like, you try to define as a dog whistle.

Do you even understand what a dog whistle is?

No one but the dog can hear it. It's invisible to everyone else.

So how is it that only democrats can hear when Trump uses one?

Also, where is there any proof that he was talking in some kind of code only they were supposed to know? Is there a code book somewhere that was discovered that proves it was a dog whistle?

Or are dems just using the term in order connect things that aren't really connected?

You don't get to just make claims like that without showing proof of it.



searcher said:
Had he simply accepted the court's rulings that the election wasn't fake
Click to expand...
There were no rulings. No evidence was heard, nor was there any discovery done.


searcher said:
Now look at all the charges he's facing. He did this to himself..........with Jan 6th.
Click to expand...
Yet he did no specific acts causing anything bad to happen on Jan 6th.

On the other hand, none of it would have happened had Nancy approved the request for NG troops.

Quick question. Do you hate Trump more than you love our nation?
 
Joe King said:
Do you even understand what a dog whistle is?
Click to expand...
dog whistle
adjective [ before noun ]
(usually dog-whistle)

UK

/ˈdɒɡ ˌwɪs.əl/ US

/ˈdɑːɡ ˌwɪs.əl/

disapproving
used to describe political messages that are intended to be understood by a particular group, especially one with feelings of racism or hatred, without actually expressing these feelings:

dictionary.cambridge.org

dog whistle

1. a whistle used to train dogs, with a very high sound that humans cannot hear…
dictionary.cambridge.org dictionary.cambridge.org

Joe King said:
There were no rulings. No evidence was heard, nor was there any discovery done.
Click to expand...


Post-election lawsuits related to the 2020 U.S. presidential election - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org


Joe King said:
Quick question. Do you hate Trump more than you love our nation?
Click to expand...

en.wikipedia.org

Adolf Hitler's rise to power - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
 
searcher said:

LIVE: Former Trump adviser Navarro begins prison sentence​

Streamed live 75 minutes ago

U.S. President Donald Trump's trade adviser Peter Navarro, who was found guilty in September of contempt of Congress for defying a subpoena, begins his prison sentence in Miami.


7:56
Click to expand...


Update.

www.cbsnews.com

Peter Navarro, ex-Trump trade adviser, released from prison

Peter Navarro, 75, was released from federal prison in Miami on Wednesday after serving a four-month sentence.
www.cbsnews.com www.cbsnews.com
 
Most folks think prison is cruel punishment. In effect, it removes you from the life you knew.

You aren't "breaking rocks in the yard" as most believe.

Depending on your 'crime' you might get 23hrs solitary confinement with 1 hr 'yard time' for exercise. Otherwise you're in General Population where you can watch TV, work out, read books etc.

You might even get a job where you clean up like a janitor, or you work in the kitchen.

Basically, you're removed from polite society.
 
searcher said:
dog whistle
adjective [ before noun ]
(usually dog-whistle)

UK

/ˈdɒɡ ˌwɪs.əl/ US

/ˈdɑːɡ ˌwɪs.əl/

disapproving
used to describe political messages that are intended to be understood by a particular group, especially one with feelings of racism or hatred, without actually expressing these feelings:
Click to expand...
Ok, so why are democrats, TDSers and the Trump hating media the only ones who can hear Trump's so-called dog whistles?

We wouldn't even know it was a thing, if it ween't for them telling us.


That's why I asked if you even know what one is, as only intended recipients can hear a dog whistle.
 
Joe King said:
That's why I asked if you even know what one is, as only intended recipients can hear a dog whistle.
Click to expand...

Mind you now.........this is just my opinion.

"proud boys, stand back and stand by"

"there were good people on both sides"

Like I said, just my opinion. Here's an interesting article on dog whistles if you're interested.

www.vox.com

Offensive political dog whistles: you know them when you hear them. Or do you?

Everyone talks about dog-whistling, but the concept is tricker than it first seems.
www.vox.com www.vox.com

BTW.........I think they're used by all sides. It's not just a D or R thing.
 
searcher said:
"proud boys, stand back and stand by"
Click to expand...
Those are words anyone can understand, and therefore it's not a dog whistle.


searcher said:
"there were good people on both sides
Click to expand...
You really shouldn't perpetuate falsehoods. That comment has thoroughly debunked.

The dems and msm used that quote of his out of context as their own dog whistle to enrage the TDSers.
....and the Trump haters believed it. Antifa rioted because of it, and here you are seven years later still repeating it as though it were true.

www.snopes.com

No, Trump Did Not Call Neo-Nazis and White Supremacists 'Very Fine People'

However, the accuracy of what Trump did claim – that there were "very fine people on both sides" of the 2017 Unite the Right debacle – is in question.
www.snopes.com www.snopes.com

No, Trump Did Not Call Neo-Nazis and White Supremacists 'Very Fine People'​




searcher said:
BTW.........I think they're used by all sides. It's not just a D or R thing.
Click to expand...
Give some examples of democrat dog whistles.
 
So how many cops went to jail for trying to blow up Kamala? Oh yea none.

Now, which way would we have been belter off? Hard to say.
 

Garland responds to Trump's vow to pardon Jan. 6 convictions​

Aug 23, 2024 #news

U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland is responding to former President Donald Trump's promise to pardon the rioters convicted in the Jan. 6 insurrection. He also warned people against contemplating future insurrections. Read more: https://bit.ly/4cFTZku


1:09
 

OMG!! Rudy GOES MISSING from Federal Court HEARING​

Aug 25, 2024

Trump and MAGA lawyer Rudy Giuliani just violated another federal court order and failed to appear to produce documents against Trump in a civil lawsuit against Trump for the injuries suffered by 8 Capitol Police officers. Michael Popok analyzes the long string of court orders that Rudy has violated in order to try to protect Trump, which could ultimately lead to him being put in jail for contempt.


10:49
 
Voodoo said:
The Court has zero standing... perhaps its starting.
Click to expand...
And this is the question everyone should be posing to the courts instead of 'volunteering' to let the court to make judgements over the human.
 

'Makes me furious': Kinzinger calls out Republicans after new Pelosi video emerges​

Aug 28, 2024
Former GOP lawmaker and House January 6 committee member Adam Kinzinger reacts to newly released video showing then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's movements and real-time reaction to the attack on the US Capitol.


6:56
 
SWAG

She released that video to prove that the Speaker of the house DOES have the power (she didn't use btw) because this next November's election will go to Trump and the Senate will refuse to recognize the result.

They want Trump supporters to go bonkers (it will be agent provocateurs - Patriot Front & Antifa dressed as Trump supporters - doing mischief) like they say happened in 2020.

Only this time the Speaker of the House Mike Johnson WILL use the National Guard (unlike Pelosi) and hopefully round them up.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom