Judge Andrew Napolitano Weighs in on the Recent Trial of Alex Jones

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more. You can visit the forum page to see the list of forum nodes (categories/rooms) for topics.

Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!

Bigfoot

Fly on the Wall
GIM2 Refugee
Messages
93
Reaction score
219
Points
113
I highly recommend the following article by Judge Andrew Napolitano. Regardless what you think of Alex Jones, the
recent court verdict is a violation of his rights, and a transgression against the US Constitution.

"The controlling Supreme Court case is Brandenburg v. Ohio, which teaches that all innocuous public speech about matters of public interest is absolutely protected — even opinion, allegory and satire — and all speech is innocuous when there is time for more speech to challenge it."

 
what happens if / when the next school shooting is so contrived, the entire world sees what's happening

will we be able to talk about it then, or will we risk a billion dollar fine for speaking about it at all?

people were 'made to think': a billion dollars is a lot of money, maybe i'll talk about something else...
 
Weaponizing dissident speech by the courts. Robert Barns was AJ's lawyer.

Ep. 2219 The Absurd Alex Jones Trials​

34m
 
Back
Top Bottom