Judge Andrew Napolitano Weighs in on the Recent Trial of Alex Jones

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a community supported watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.

Register a free account to join the discussions. When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including access to market data/charts and additional members only rooms (including one for trade/barter with the community).

Bigfoot

Fly on the Wall
GIM2 Refugee
Messages
93
Reaction score
219
Points
113
I highly recommend the following article by Judge Andrew Napolitano. Regardless what you think of Alex Jones, the
recent court verdict is a violation of his rights, and a transgression against the US Constitution.

"The controlling Supreme Court case is Brandenburg v. Ohio, which teaches that all innocuous public speech about matters of public interest is absolutely protected — even opinion, allegory and satire — and all speech is innocuous when there is time for more speech to challenge it."

 
what happens if / when the next school shooting is so contrived, the entire world sees what's happening

will we be able to talk about it then, or will we risk a billion dollar fine for speaking about it at all?

people were 'made to think': a billion dollars is a lot of money, maybe i'll talk about something else...
 
Weaponizing dissident speech by the courts. Robert Barns was AJ's lawyer.

Ep. 2219 The Absurd Alex Jones Trials​

34m
 
Back
Top Bottom