SCOTUS: Moody v NetChoice (NetChoice v Paxon) - internet content moderation v first amendment

Issue before or regarding the Supreme Court of The United States

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more. You can visit the forum page to see the list of forum nodes (categories/rooms) for topics.

Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!

pmbug

Your Host
Administrator
Benefactor
Messages
14,445
Reaction score
4,551
Points
268
Location
Texas
United-States
The Supreme Court will hear two cases Monday on laws passed in Florida and Texas that target purported “censorship” by social media companies—which could broadly impact how social media giants can be regulated and what information users see online, depending on how the court rules.

The court will hear two cases, Moody v. Netchoice LLC and Netchoice LLC v. Paxton, in which Netchoice—a lobbying group representing social media companies—is challenging social media laws in Florida and Texas, respectively.

The Florida law, which an appeals court struck down as unconstitutional, fines social media companies up to $250,000 per day if they “willfully deplatform” political candidates by banning them or suspending them for more than two weeks, and prohibits banning “journalistic enterprises” for their content.

Texas’ law, which a different appeals court upheld, bans social media platforms from censoring users based on their “viewpoints,” requiring companies to disclose how they moderate content, explain to users why their content was removed and establish a complaint process for users to protest either content on the site or content moderation decisions.
...

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/new...ip-laws-today-here-s-what-to-know/ar-BB1iU6KT
 
...
Briefs were submitted to the Court by the respective States, NetChoice, and other parties either in favor of the States or NetChoice, or neither party. In order to help Tech Policy Press readers better understand what arguments are being made by the amici, we put together brief summaries of them. These summaries are intended to offer the broad contours of each brief, and thus do not always contain every argument contained within them. If the reader wants a complete version of any one brief, the link to the document is provided in the text.
...

More (Cato & EFF among others wrote in support of NetChoice):

 
Back
Top Bottom