The plot thickens
So now we learn that Beth Yusi, the Virginia prosecutor who fought against charging Letitia James, was fired for allegedly emailing investigative files about James to her personal account.
Let that sink in.
The same prosecutor who wrote the “no evidence” memo somehow had so much evidence she needed to take it home.
DOJ calls it a “policy violation.” Her lawyer calls it “nonsense.” CNN calls it “internal turmoil.”
But let’s call it what it looks like: damage control with a digital paper trail.
If Yusi really did forward files, that means she removed active case material from DOJ servers — a major breach. That’s not “career dissent,” that’s “career suicide.”
If she didn’t, then DOJ’s audit logs must’ve shown something that made them sure enough to pull the trigger. Either way, they don’t fire a 20-year prosecutor on rumor alone.
And here’s the part everyone’s pretending not to ask:

What exactly did she do with those emails once they hit her private account?

Who else saw them?

And why did every “insufficient evidence” argument somehow end up outside official channels?
When the prosecutor who wanted to protect Letitia James gets caught protecting her files, it starts to sound less like a legal disagreement — and more like a leak disguised as conscience.