ChatGPT: Salt and Carthage

Highlights thread as a discussion with ChatGPT

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more. You can visit the forum page to see the list of forum nodes (categories/rooms) for topics.

Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!

Someone_else

Predaceous Stink Bug
GIM2 Refugee
Messages
206
Reaction score
207
Points
168
In Roman times, salt was supposedly very valuable, giving us the word "salary" and the phrase "worth his salt". In another story, they destroyed Carthage farmland with immense amounts of salt.

Was salt cheap during the Carthage times? How did the Romans get the salt for this?
 
Salt was indeed a highly valuable commodity in ancient times, including during the Carthaginian era. It was essential for preserving food, especially in the absence of refrigeration, and was also a crucial element for various industries and in rituals. The scarcity of salt in certain regions made it a precious and sought-after commodity.

Carthaginians likely sourced salt from various methods such as mining salt deposits, evaporating seawater, or extracting salt from salt pans. The Romans, on the other hand, had access to techniques like salt mining and salt pans as well. Salt was harvested in coastal areas by evaporating seawater in large pans, leaving behind salt deposits. Salt mining was another popular method, where salt was extracted from underground deposits using mining techniques.

Regarding the alleged salting of Carthage's farmland by the Romans, it is a controversial topic among historians. While it is a well-known anecdote, there is debate about the scale and historical accuracy of this narrative. Some historians argue that the salting of Carthage's fields would have been an inefficient use of resources and could have been more symbolic than practical. Additionally, the environmental impact of such an act would have been long-lasting and detrimental to the region.

Overall, while salt was a valuable commodity during ancient times, including during the Carthaginian era, the details of how it was sourced and the historical accuracy of the salting of Carthage's farmland are topics that continue to be discussed and researched by historians.
 
Regarding the alleged salting of Carthage's farmland by the Romans, it is a controversial topic among historians. While it is a well-known anecdote, there is debate about the scale and historical accuracy of this narrative.
What is the most widely used source for this narrative?
 
What is the most widely used source for this narrative?
One of the most famous references to the salting of Carthage comes from the Roman historian Tacitus. He mentioned the act in his work "Histories," specifically in the context of the destruction of Carthage by the Romans during the Third Punic War. While Tacitus is a respected historian, it is important to note that his account was written several decades after the events and may have been influenced by earlier myths and legends about the destruction of Carthage.

It's worth highlighting that while Tacitus is a significant source for this narrative, there are other ancient sources and later accounts that also mention the salting of Carthage as a symbol of total destruction. These include writers such as Dio Cassius and Pliny the Elder, among others. However, the historical accuracy of this specific act remains a subject of ongoing debate among scholars and historians.
 
Back
Top Bottom