Second Amendment Rights

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a community supported watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.

Register a free account to join the discussions. When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including access to market data/charts and additional members only rooms (including one for trade/barter with the community).

If you read the article take it fwiw, dyodd and make of it what you will.

 
Oooohhh, yeah! GUN CONTROL!

Make all our neighborhoods as safe as Chicago's!

We don't need none of that Montana-style Second-Amendment freedom...nosirree, those Montana folks are strange ones. They don't even need many COPS! How the hell can we Organize police unions, when there's only a few police?

We need moar gun-control, and then moar cops to deal with all the safety that disarming the law-abiding brings!
 

Federal appeals court upholds controversial Illinois ban on semiautomatic guns​

A federal appeals court upheld a controversial Illinois gun control law that largely bans assault weapons.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit decision issued on Thursday slapped down a district court decision that declared the ban unconstitutional.

"Among other things, the Act criminalizes the manufacture, sale, delivery, purchase, and possession of assault weapons and large-capacity magazines. A grandfather clause permits preexisting lawful owners of the regulated items to continue possessing them," the Thursday decision noted.

More:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/f...miautomatic-guns/ar-AA27Fd21?ocid=socialshare
 
Another Buyden-Obombah political judge, no doubt.

What's an assault weapon? Any weapon that assaults someone. IOW, any weapon you want it to be.

What's a semiautomatic? Well...gee. Samuel Colt made the first one. Yeah. Any weapon that loads itself with a trigger pull.

That's most firearms.

This is the No-Guns-Moar-Chaos Liberal template. Works fine in former European nations.
 
Came across the by accident. Posting for anyone interested.

Step-By-Step Process to Obtain a "Restricted Firearm" After August 1 in Colorado​

Jul 15, 2026


13:41

Jump to Topics:
0:33: Shortened process summary
1:02: Steps Broken Down
1:10: Application on CPW website
2:43: Hunter Safety info broken down
3:55: Application goes to Sheriff's Dept.
4:47: Obtain a third party background check
5:52: Obtaining your Eligibility Card
6:16: Sign up for a class
8:00 Purchasing a "Specific Semi-automatic Firearm (SSF)"
9:44: Who has to take the course and who is exempt
11:00: What firearms are exempt and restricted

- ➡️Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) Specific Semiautomatic Page (SSF) Official Page : https://cpw.state.co.us/specified-sem...
- State Dealer Division Official Restricted Firearm List: https://sbg.colorado.gov/sites/sbg/fi...
- More links below the vid on youtube.
 
WTF is a "semiautomatic"?

That's basically all handguns except single-shot dueling pistols. Which would remain unrestricted...go figure.

Well, we knew this day would come. And the Stuporeme Kourt has been feminized with Trump-insider closet fem-Leftists. No relief from that quarter.
 
^^^
Make sure existing restrictions DO NOT WORK...thus paving the way for public acceptance of a blanket nationwide ban.
 
^^^ Care to expand on that? A felon or "prohibited" person might be a bad guy, but it might be a good guy whose rights were trampled.
 
searcher said:

House Democrats pass sweeping gun control package over GOP objections​

Measures include an assault weapons ban, expanded gun industry liability and new storage rules as Republicans warn of constitutional challenges.​

Click to expand...
Stuff like that is why dems should never be permitted the reigns of power. Just look at the shit they'd do.


Casey Jones said:
I don't know anyone who's clamoring for a machine gun. Taking Original Intent, it probably is unconstitutional, but there are SO many pressing problems ahead of it. Why aren't they addressing the FAR-MOAR unconstitutional "permitting" of handgun owners?
Click to expand...
Afaik, they just address the cases as they come into the Court. If no one ever challenged it, they woulda never had the case in order to make such a ruling.
 
Someone_else said:
^^^ Care to expand on that? A felon or "prohibited" person might be a bad guy, but it might be a good guy whose rights were trampled.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I get that.

But remember, the Left never says, "This is the objective; this is where we've achieved it." It's always to push further and harder until they have Stalin's Utopia, or chaos.

Leaving laws as they are, doesn't work into that. Strip them out, so we can have MOAR "Gun Violence" and the stooges in state assemblies, can say, gee, that didn't work, lets just ban THEM ALL.

Or get the Congress-traitors to do it. See? Pushing the ball ahead.

Now, felons' gun rights are an odd way to argue wrongful conviction. If someone is wrongfully convicted, he's imprisoned, losing years or decades of his life. THAT is a more-pressing issue (to him and us) than his right to have a gun.

If the conviction is wrongful, all kinds of rights are lost. If he can prove it was wrongful, let the courts examine that. NOT return his right to have a weapon, WHILE leaving him adjudicated a "convicted felon."

Because for every railroaded innocent, and for every rehabilitated criminal, there's a thousand simians who learned nothing, who enjoyed their stay in the Crossbar Hilton, and now would love to be able to go burn some @SS now.
 
You Don't Have "2nd Amendment Rights." You Just Have Rights.

Streamed live 18 hours ago Path to Liberty
Millions of people today refer to their rights by amendment number, as if they get them FROM the Bill of Rights. Like referring to their right to keep and bear arms as their “2nd Amendment Rights.” But the founders saw things far differently. The words on paper aren’t a permission slip for the people. They aren’t a “gun permit.” They are a restraining order for government: hands off our natural rights.
Path to Liberty: August 26, 2026


17:58
 
Since we don't have the will to fight, apparently we have no rights at all.

Only permissions from our Epstein-Class Elites.
 
An AR is simply a design of manufacture.

Not a performance class; not an exceptionally-lethal weapon.

It SCARES...the Culture-War pawns; because that's what nastybad SOLDIERS use.

So, BAN IT.
 
Joe King said:
It's because it merely LOOKS like what soldiers use.

No military uses the AR-15.
Click to expand...
Are you sure? The model, ArmaLite Rifle Model 15, became the basis for the M-16 military carbine.

The AR-15 itself, according to Brave AI, was used experimentally by UK forces in Indonesia, and was issued to forces in South Vietnam in a stealth arming of friendlies. About 1000 issuances there.

So, while of course, your FFD-purchased AR-15, without auto-fire, was never issued to regular combat troops, it's a cousin to what in fact was.
 
Casey Jones said:
Are you sure? The model, ArmaLite Rifle Model 15, became the basis for the M-16 military carbine.

The AR-15 itself, according to Brave AI, was used experimentally by UK forces in Indonesia, and was issued to forces in South Vietnam in a stealth arming of friendlies. About 1000 issuances there.

So, while of course, your FFD-purchased AR-15, without auto-fire, was never issued to regular combat troops, it's a cousin to what in fact was.
Click to expand...
Yes, the M16 is the military version of the AR-15.

Those instances you refer to were not the AR15 available to the public.

All of those had a select fire option (Full auto) and per my limited knowledge, were actually Colt 601 and 602's marked AR-15

The AR15 I referred to is the semi auto civilian rifle available at gun stores.

That gun has never been used by any military. Only full auto variants of it.

Sorry for any confusion in my previous post.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom