The national statistical institute of Norway (main producer of official statistics) says climate change is bullshyt

[JayDubya]

No Way, Norway​

04 Oct 2023 | News Roundup

Well, this is awkward. Statistics Norway, aka Statistisk sentralbyrå or “the national statistical institute of Norway and the main producer of official statistics”, has just published a paper “To what extent are temperature levels changing due to greenhouse gas emissions?” The awkward part isn’t trying to grasp the subtleties of Norwegian since it’s also available in English. It’s that the Abstract bluntly declares that “standard climate models are rejected by time series data on global temperatures” while the conclusions state “the results imply that the effect of man-made CO2 emissions does not appear to be sufficiently strong to cause systematic changes in the pattern of the temperature fluctuations.” But the really awkward part is that a paper from a government agency dares to address openly so many questions the alarmist establishment has spent decades declaring taboo, from the historical record on climate to the existence of massive uncertainty among scientists on it.

https://climatediscussionnexus.com/2023/10/04/no-way-norway/

 

[Joe King]

“standard climate models are rejected by time series data on global temperatures”

Every climate model forecast they've made since the Globull warming bs got started 35+ years ago, has been wrong.

 

[chieftain]

No Way, Norway​

04 Oct 2023 | News Roundup

Well, this is awkward. Statistics Norway, aka Statistisk sentralbyrå or “the national statistical institute of Norway and the main producer of official statistics”, has just published a paper “To what extent are temperature levels changing due to greenhouse gas emissions?” The awkward part isn’t trying to grasp the subtleties of Norwegian since it’s also available in English. It’s that the Abstract bluntly declares that “standard climate models are rejected by time series data on global temperatures” while the conclusions state “the results imply that the effect of man-made CO2 emissions does not appear to be sufficiently strong to cause systematic changes in the pattern of the temperature fluctuations.” But the really awkward part is that a paper from a government agency dares to address openly so many questions the alarmist establishment has spent decades declaring taboo, from the historical record on climate to the existence of massive uncertainty among scientists on it.

https://climatediscussionnexus.com/2023/10/04/no-way-norway/

 

[nickndfl]

It is 100% BS.

A bunch of AHs created a new currency of carbon credits out of thin air. In order for them to have any value on paper somebody needs to buy into CC BS.