Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.
Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!
...also consider that Schiff might be taking into account, that each of his interviews might be someone's FIRST time he/she came across him, thus he might want to break through the initial "who the hell this joker thinks he is" attitude of his first-time viewers, by quoting his fulfilled predictions.
... correlation with US debt is the best one can ever get on PM (gold) prices, and that is quite natural, as it is solvency of the USA and USD based system , not actual inflation as such (but expected inflation at the collapse/reset) that is driving the PM prices up.
In 2011- beginning of 2012 US debt growth SPEED ( increase/year or even better, % increase/year) has come markedly down from almost 2 trillion/year increase in 2009 and 2010. In fact, in 2011 it has been 1/2 of 2010 increase- about 1 trillion , so far the same low speed is maintained in 2012. Hence the drop in PM prices in 2011 - early 2012 as expectations of continuous fast debt growth which drove the overbuying in 2011 (but was quite logical on the back of 2009-2010 debt growth speed) of the USA debt did not materialize. However, this is just a temporary slowdown (it also happened after tech bubble before Iraq war) for many reasons, recession/USD strength being the most obvious one. War- if that happens- absolutely. These things all may happen before November, as well as QE as a response to them. But it will happen, I mean acceleration in the USA debt growth.
One more thing- for systems moving towards crash ( i.e. partial default on US debt) , it is quite characteristic to show log-periodic oscillations before the final spike and crash. Log-periodic oscillations in such case INCREASE in frequency (decrease in wave length) nearing the crash. These oscillations sit on top of exponential growth curve, so are more clearly visible in logarithmic chart. Close to crash, growth curve turns superexponential ( on log chart that would mean upwards deviation from straight line) and oscillations disappear.
Looking at US debt chart above, there are easily discernable two waves on top of exponential growth, with a natural beginning in 1971 when USD was moved of gold and debt accumulation became inevitable way of US operating mode. The first wave is 30 years long, ending in 2001 where the next wave starts. The next wave seems to end in 2011- 2012, making its length 10-11 years. I think this is the last wave before the crash, but of course there could be one more 3-4 years long delaying the default to 2016-2017-even 2018. ( I think it will be end of 2015).
The ratio between the periods, 30/10=3 or 30/11 = 2,72 which is quite close to basic constant in time related processes in nature, e = 2,718... Such ratios between log-periodic oscillation period lengths occur quite often ( close to 3) and , while there are no proofs, can be considered quite Natural in time related processes in the same sense as Fibonacci ratios are natural and often met in Nature in size/number related values.
So either
1) this was the last oscillation and next is the superexponential spike into default ( in which case default comes 2014-2015 end) ,
2)or there will be still one more oscillation of about 3-3,5 year length , leading to INCREASED rate of debt growth in 2012-2015 and crash (partial default) in 2016-7-8.
In both cases, the PM prices shall move up , though in first case it will happen much faster and the end of normalcy will come much faster as well.
Choose between these two , my modeling here http://www.tfmetalsreport.com/comment/83050#comment-83050 pointed more to the case 1), but that modeling is not definitive as fit is not perfect. Lack the knowledge/matehmatical resources. I wonder why Sornette has not done this projection in his Financial Crisis Observatory site-looks so obvious and very interesting target to me to predict:
http://www.er.ethz.ch/fco/index
So, late October is the witching week?
Particularly if those crashes involve airplanes.IMHOI, crahses are emotional and not subject to numerology, fibonaci or otherwise.
true, they are emotional, but you imply here, that our emotions cannot be numbers-related - while they POSSIBLY could be related/described in numbers, at least some of their characteristics... Like for example some natural/statistically prevailing sense of timing. Example - ever tried to talk on a walkie-talkie without employing an official protocol (or over a connection with a significant time lag)? People tend to wait for a response from the other side of the line for very similar period of time. Both of them. Then BOTH of them start talking, simultaneously. Then they stop, when they realize that the other person also just started. And again, they instinctively tend to wait for a very similar period of time, before starting talking together againIMHOI, crahses are emotional and not subject to numerology, fibonaci or otherwise.
When do I think we MIGHT have another crash like 1929 or 2008? Dates that come to mind are Friday, 28 October 2016, and Friday, 26 October 2018. I strongly suspect that one of those two dates will see a market low 40% under the high around the previous Labor Day. However, I do not have enough information to stick my neck out and say it will happen on either of those days, although I tend to lean towards 2018.
When do I think we MIGHT have another crash like 1929 or 2008? Dates that come to mind are Friday, 28 October 2016, and Friday, 25 October 2019. I strongly suspect that one of those two dates will see a market low 40% under the high around the previous Labor Day. However, I do not have enough information to stick my neck out and say it will happen on either of those days, although I tend to lean towards 2019.
2008 + 10 = 2018
A crash is not mathematically possible in late October 2017, 2019, & 2020, but I think 2016, though possible, is too early. That leaves only 2018 as a viable date. A lot of things can happen in the next few years. Come 2015, I will probably be ready to stick my head in the guillotine and predict the date of the next crash.
2008 + 11 = 2019
A crash is not mathematically possible in late October 2017, 2018, & 2020, but I think 2016, though possible, is too early. That leaves only 2019 as a viable date. A lot of things can happen in the next few years. Come 2015, I will probably be ready to stick my head in the guillotine and predict the date of the next crash.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?