Lancers32
Often Wrong Never In Doubt
- Messages
- 1,903
- Reaction score
- 2,189
- Points
- 298
That's actually good.
Because if it were done 100% with private funds, it would make it easy for a dem to tear it down as soon as one happens to get elected.
It would only have cost the donors, not the taxpayers.
This way, if some public monies are involved, it'll be a lot harder to justify doing that.
Using public money, the Dems will be stuck with a Trump ballroom.
The Dems seem to have no problem justify the strangest shit imaginable. Some Repukes too. As far as the ballroom goes I say spend away. What's a few less Somali millionaires?