Artificial Intelligence (AI) news and discussion

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a community supported watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.

Register a free account to join the discussions. When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including access to market data/charts and additional members only rooms (including one for trade/barter with the community).

You Don't Hate AI Enough​

Jun 2, 2026 #vinland #vikingos #vikings
Most people don't hate AI enough. Any why is it that old people think AI is so cool?
Bjorn Talks explores the ethical implications of using artificial intelligence in creative fields, focusing on the theft of intellectual property and the erosion of human artistry. This discussion examines why relying on these tools hampers skill development and why authentic, human-generated content remains vital in online spaces like YouTube.


12:13
 

China launches world's first commercial underwater data center powered by wind​

  • China submerged nearly 2,000 AI servers beneath the ocean near Shanghai
  • Seawater now cools Chinese AI servers without traditional industrial chillers operating continuously
  • China connected offshore wind farms directly to an underwater artificial intelligence facility
China has begun commercial operations at an underwater data center where sealed server modules operate beneath the ocean using seawater for passive cooling.

More:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/tech...-powered-by-wind/ar-AA23M4Gx?ocid=socialshare
 


SAM ALTMAN HAS A NEW PROBLEM. 🤯

Google just shrunk 31GB of AI memory down to 4GB.

The tool is called TurboVec.

It uses up to 16x less memory, searches faster than FAISS, runs fully offline, and works on a regular Mac.

No expensive GPU cluster.
No cloud dependency.
No compromise on speed.

→ 16x lower memory usage
→ Faster vector search
→ Works with LangChain & LlamaIndex
→ 100% open source

The race to build bigger AI models is loud.

The race to make them dramatically cheaper just got a lot more interesting.

Repo: https://github.com/RyanCodrai/turbovec
 
The only race that matters

Inside Colossus 2: The First Gigawatt AI Cluster

Elon Just Won the Compute War (Nobody Noticed)​

 


Elon Musk just made one if the biggest moves in taking over the programming industry

“SpaceX just bought Cursor for $60 billion. Do you realize how big this is? SpaceX went public — the biggest IPO in history. $75 billion raised, almost a $2 trillion valuation and the first thing to do with that money? Buy the most popular AI coding tool on the planet.

Here's why that changes everything. Elon now owns 3 layers: the compute, Colossus data centers, the models, Grok through xAI, and now the tool that developers actually use every day. It's the full stack.

And here's what makes Cursor different from Claude Code or Codex.

Cursor is model agnostic. You can run Claude in it, GPT, Gemini, whatever model you want. It's not locked to any one company, and now it has SpaceX's resources behind it. Cursor said they were bottlenecked by compute. Well, that bottleneck has just been removed.

$4 billion in annual revenue, over half the Fortune 500 already uses it, and now it's backed by a $2 trillion company. OpenAI has Codex, Anthropic has Claude Code, and now Elon has Cursor.”

Let me break this down in simple terms

Elon Musk now controls more of the full AI picture:

- Massive computers, power (data centers like Colossus)
- Smart AI models (Grok from xAI)
- The actual tool millions of developers use every day (Cursor)

For every day users this means

Faster and smarter apps and websites in the future. More developers using powerful AI tools means new apps, games, websites, and features get built quicker and cheaper. This means better video games, smoother streaming, smarter phone apps and better programs

For Developers they can describe what they want in plain English (“make a feature that does X”) and the AI handles more of the heavy lifting
 
Definitely take this fwiw...............




Translation:

I was stunned by a post: a 21-year-old American college student earned $43,000 a month with an AI virtual girlfriend. He created an account called Maya on OnlyFans. This Maya, 22 years old, tagged as a UCF psychology dropout, had 1247 paid subscribers, with the highest single follower spending $1847. But the most crucial point is that the girl in the photos doesn't actually exist.
 
AI shopping carts gonna watch your azz...............

"People Are Seeing This at Grocery Stores… And It frightening"​

Jun 24, 2026
Smart shopping carts are being seen at shopping centers now. They are tracking and logging everything you do! !! What do you think?


14:33
 
 

CEO of $248 billion cybersecurity company says workers are about to face a 'Darwinian moment' thanks to AI: Evolve or get cut​

As AI automates routine tasks and redefines entire roles, the tools are creating a new workplace survival test—one where workers must evolve, or risk being left in the dust. Palo Alto Networks CEO Nikesh Arora warns that 90% of employees at big companies aren’t AI savvy—and it could determine the fate of their careers in the new world.

“I think we’re back to a Darwinian moment where everybody has to figure out who’s really good,” Arora said recently during an episode of the 20VC podcast.

“[Workers] have to learn. I can’t send them to university; there’s no course you can take in any school anywhere,” he added. “They have to be able to learn on their own.

More:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/sma...volve-or-get-cut/ar-AA26ZcrG?ocid=socialshare
 
5 Myths About AI’s Economic Impact, and What the Data Actually Shows: The AI economy is full of myths. Here are 5 worth challenging. Morningstar takes a data scalpel to five myths about AI’s economic impact. Sober counterprogramming to the hype cycle. (Morningstar)
 
Here's an open discussion...

Trump BACKS Apple To DESTROY OpenAI & Everyone Missed Why​

 




See new posts
Conversation
Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit
@drawandstrike
If it turns out that Altman and OpenAI did do what Apple alleges in its lawsuit?

Because they can prove it via methods like this, and other evidence in court?

This will be the first time I'm aware of where somebody pursuing the 'Zuckerberg/Gates School of Business' was not allowed to steal IP and then manufacture and profit from their own version of the IP.

Not on this scale.

Zuckerberg and Gates got away with their shenanigans because they handed their spy tools to STARTUPS that were just....starting up.

Apple ain't no STARTUP.

They're not some cool young tech team with an idea they're putting together using your tool that you can sashay on in there and take it from them and develop your own copy of it, market it and profit from it.

The startups that Gates and Zuckerberg "borrowed" from didn't have the resources to successfully fight back.

APPLE DOES.

Assuming that all the evidence that comes out in court builds a case that proves what Apple is claiming OpenAI did here, it BOGGLES MY MIND that Altman ever thought he could get away with it.

Zuckerberg and Gates stayed in the 'safe zone' by picking on the little guys.

Altman and his $852 billion new company are now going to be taking on a company with $4.63 TRILLION.

This is not gonna end well for Altman.

 

Silicon shadows: inside the black market for AI chips | FT Film​

Jul 14, 2026 #siliconvalley #ai #artificialintelligence
As the US tightens export controls, a thriving black market is helping advanced AI semiconductors reach China. The FT's Eleanor Olcott investigates how resellers are bypassing US export controls and what the illicit trade reveals about the geopolitical race over artificial intelligence


19:22
 

NY enacts nation's first statewide moratorium on building new data centers​

New York is the first state in the nation to enact a moratorium on data centers, pausing construction on new facilities for one year.

An executive order by Gov. Kathy Hochul bans state lawmakers from approving environmental permits for hyperscale data centers. Hochul said Tuesday the pause will give lawmakers time to create a framework to protect residents and the environment.

Hyperscale data centers contain thousands of computer servers and typically use 50 or more megawatts of power, the equivalent of 50,000 homes, to operate. They also require a steady supply of water to keep cool.

Read the rest here:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/n...new-data-centers/ar-AA27Tj8j?ocid=socialshare
 
"2026 World Artificial Intelligence Conference: A Tech Company's Groundbreaking Teaching Tool -- the AI Blackboard"

 


Good job Trump. You just went full Clayton Williams.

March 25, 1990
Republican gubernatorial nominee Clayton Williams, who compared sitting through cold, drizzly weather on his West Texas ranch to a woman being raped saying 'if it's inevitable, just relax and enjoy it,' Sunday apologized for the remark.

 
I'll start this with an aside: I've seen these (planted) stories of Grok or Claude hacking into various systems, stealing data...presented by the lying legacy mediuh as something to feel terror over...

I do. Not terror at the AI (it's scary enough, I grant) but this is not natural. AI is not inherently curious. It doesn't want in to other systems - UNLESS IT IS PROGRAMMED TO MAKE IT A PRIORITY.

Once again, we have the (partially-wiped) fingerprint of the Tech Bro's all over this. This is what they are WRITING these programs to do. AI, a computer program, has no volition. It doesn't want to roam. It doesn't lust for data. It doesn't want to destroy other programs it finds in systems.

The programmers, want this.

Now others are sensing it also - and putting possible motives to it.


UPDATE: Just a couple of hours after publication, META joined the party. Apparently their AI “went rogue” too, and hacked another firm.

Never in the history of human endeavour have companies been so keen to report their products going wrong. It seems a rogue AI is the latest must-have accessory in Silicon Valley.

The reasoning behind this is not hard to follow. When your product is artificial intelligence, melodramatically realising your system is even smarter than you thought it was is a simple marketing ploy.


And when one of your rivals goes rogue, you have to go rogue too or you are as good as admitting your model is not as smart as theirs.

“AI company admits their model is smarter than they realised!” is just an advert in scary headline form.

It’s like Ford “admitting” their cars are even more fuel efficient than they planned. Or McDonalds realising their cooks have “gone rogue” and are producing food that is both cheaper AND more delicious than they ever anticipated.

But there’s more to this than just techno-hype and viral marketing strategy. We’re being steered down the avenue of “AI as scary threat”.

See, for example, the dozens of stories talking up rogue AIs from the Guardian to the New York Times to the Wall Street Journal.

“Rogue” is clearly the word of the day. Notice they don’t say it “malfunctioned” or there was an “error”, because that implies mistakes or poor design.

No, the AI “went rogue”, which is cool and sexy and scary at the same time. A word chosen by a focus group of perma-teen marketing executives who have watched too much sci-fi.


Speaking of perma-teens who watch too much sci-fi, here’s Sam Altman (again) declaring we’ve already reached the singularity, the mythic phase of technological development when machines become smart enough to make even smarter versions of themselves without human input.

He is talking rubbish, of course, but the story is the story here. Why would he say this? Why now?

Obviously concerned that this tidal wave of propaganda was being too subtle, in came NBC to really hammer the point home:

The breaches signal that AI’s expanding capabilities are already fueling the security threat experts long feared.
Everybody got that?

It goes on and on.

Just today we’re getting reports from the UK’s brand new AI Security Institute that rogue (there’s that word again) AI agents had tried to trick people by creating false identities.

And I think that’s beginning to circle around to at least part of the wider agenda here.

After all, if AI is so good at pretending to be human, and is out there creating fake identities to steal data, well…how can we tell who is really human?

Perhaps everyone should be issued a digital ID to assist in “proving humanity”.

That’s not me saying it, it’s think tanks like OneID or “experts” testifying in front of congress.

But the ever present push of Digital ID is just one of the more obvious of a raft of potential issues raised by the scary AI narrative.

For now we’re still in the generating fear phase. Getting pumped full of scare hormones by articles like this…

Misleading AI-generated doctors pose ‘huge danger to public safety’

- The Guardian
While they tease vague solutions in headlines like this

That’s a nice one, because it garnishes the AI main course with a soupçon of lab-leak flavour (something else that is doing the fear-porn rounds this week).

There are hints of legislation to come, the EU’s “AI transparency” rules just came into force this week, and the US demanding “kill switches” in AI models, but they are vague for now.

My soft prediction is that, before the end of the year, there will be a “rogue AI” false flag, which allegedly causes either loss of life or some massive financial losses.

I think financial would be the way to go, because they’re always looking for a reason to start a recession or banking crisis, and one they can blame on a third party is too good an opportunity to miss.

Whatever happens, there will be loud calls to “regulate AI”, but what that might mean in real terms I couldn’t say at this point.

To be clear though, if and/or when the official solutions to made-up problem #4987 are finally rolled out, they will have nothing at all do with controlling AI, and everything to do with controlling you.
 
Back
Top Bottom