Artificial Intelligence (AI) news and discussion

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a community supported watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.

Register a free account to join the discussions. When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including access to market data/charts and additional members only rooms (including one for trade/barter with the community).

That's her platform.

Personal vendettas.

That, and personal enrichment.

Yup, democracy lives in the Untied Skates...
 
OpenAI trains on professor's "private" notes (stored in 3rd party computer system) and solves math problem. Professor confronts OpenAI about it and they threaten him.

 
OpenAI trains on professor's "private" notes (stored in 3rd party computer system) and solves math problem. Professor confronts OpenAI about it and they threaten him.


Unfortunately, almost any data we "share" with a third party, is seen as us willingly and literally sharing it with everyone.


That's why I've always thought people are cRaZy for ever using cloud storage for their data.

Why would anyone want to put their stuff on a computer someone else controls? Seems pretty short sighted, to put it nicely.
 

‘Kill us all’: Anthropic staffer Jacob Coxon resigns with a terrifying warning​

He helped build the world’s most advanced AI models at OpenAI and Anthropic. Now, Jacob Coxon has a stark warning for the public.

Harrison Christian

An Anthropic researcher has quit with a stark public warning: the AI arms race is moving too fast, and even the people building these systems fear it could “kill us all” by the end of the decade.

“I resigned from Anthropic today,” Jacob Coxon wrote in an X post on Wednesday, explaining that he had spent the last three years doing “pretraining research” at both OpenAI and Anthropic.

more
 
^^^^

Just as kids today have forgotten there was a way around lost phone or Bluetooth signals, or locked-down e-banking to pay for a coffee...so, too, are we forgetting, all this schitt runs on POWER.

Kill the power, stop the menace. OFF switch.

I was listening to a tech-bro podcast...I'd downloaded it a couple weeks earlier, it's not one I usually listen to, so I don't remember it. But the interviewee was (seemingly) TERRIFIED of AI as an animated force.

I simply do not get it. A computer, ANY computer or network...PROCESSES INFORMATION. It has no volition, other than what is coded into it. It doesn't want to do evil - or good. If it's told to replicate itself, it will; but that's because it's programmed to do it.

If it's told to cause failure of various types (such as explosion, data erasure, arming automated weaponry to attack a different set of targets) it's because it was programmed in. Now, if AI is writing the code, the AI-Slop principle will mean soon original parameters are erased; but again, that is what the coders chose to do. Let a demonstrated-failed protocol write code that can destroy, and without oversight or testing.

It comes down to the OFF switch...the knife switch on the pole feeding high-voltage into the data-center's substation; whatever.

But we're now afraid to even contemplate that, just as we're afraid to have a smart refrigerator not report to the Government Oversight computer bank, what we purchased.
 
... AI as an animated force.

I simply do not get it. ...

What happens when AI code is written by AI? When the directions given to AI come from AI talking to other AI (at the speed of compute) and humans are not involved in the process. These are the questions that are beginning to play out as these companies are pushing the frontiers. The changes and decisions are occurring faster than human surveillance can keep up with.
 
What happens when AI code is written by AI? When the directions given to AI come from AI talking to other AI (at the speed of compute) and humans are not involved in the process. These are the questions that are beginning to play out as these companies are pushing the frontiers. The changes and decisions are occurring faster than human surveillance can keep up with.
We already know. It becomes gibberish in short order.

It's the origination of the term AI Slop. You can even see it on new AI Eww Tube videos, that show, say, someone pouring gas into their car-door handle, or six fingers, or a tree growing out of a mid-rise roof.

What happens when coders get so sloppy as to let flawed AI write code, is, you turn the damn box off. Or you have a tool where authorities can turn it off. With papers and, yes, weapons.

Those coders who caused chaos that way, can go into a real-time gaol cell.
 
Just when you thought it was safe to go out...



Important: Houthis Used @claudeai @AnthropicAI for Missile Programming

Excerpt from the Detecting and countering misuse of AI: September 2026

GTG-87001: Disrupting a Yemen-based guided weapons engineering cell using Claude to develop guidance software

Summary
We identified a cell of threat actors based in northern Yemen running three weapons development programs: a guided rocket that used a commodity phone-class flight computer with final-phase homing guidance; a multi-stage ballistic missile with a stated range goal above 2,000 km; and a multi-variant missile (referred to as the “R2000” set) that included a hypersonic glide vehicle variant.

The actors used Claude Code in place of human software engineers to develop the guidance, navigation, and control (GNC) software that steers and stabilizes a flying vehicle. For example, they used Claude to integrate an open-source autopilot onto a phone-class flight computer, writing the control and position estimation software, tuning the control settings, running a firmware build pipeline, and performing a flight simulation. The actors managed several Claude instances at once, assigning each one a role, much as a lead would delegate work on a small engineering team: the actors tasked one instance with writing the code, another with research, and a third with reviewing the code the first instance produced.

Our safeguards blocked many of their requests, but not all of them. The actors used a variety of tactics to evade our safeguards, including hiding their goals and the products the software was meant for, and they split their work across multiple sessions so no single session revealed their full intent.

These actors carried out a sustained effort to develop guided weapons, including using Claude to design guidance software. We do not have evidence the actors succeeded in fielding an operational device; but they did test-fire a guided rocket. This field test appears to have failed: within hours, the actors returned to Claude to work out why it failed.

We identified this activity as part of our internal investigations into suspected weapons development. We banned accounts associated with the actors and shared threat information with public- and private-sector partners to mitigate risks posed by the actors. Nevertheless, we have evidence that the actors had already built an offline simulation toolkit that does not rely on Claude or other engineering computing environments such as MATLAB.




The important distinction is what Anthropic actually claims

A Yemen based cell used Claude Code as a stand in software team for guidance development, splitting the work across sessions so no single conversation revealed the full intent

Anthropic also says it has no evidence the actors successfully fielded an operational device

Both facts matter

The concern is not “AI built a missile”

It is that AI was useful enough to assist real weapons engineering while safeguards could be partially evaded by decomposing the work

That is already a significant capability and governance problem
 


When companies go public they must file paperwork disclosing their financials.

Doing so would expose the massive cash burn OpenAI is using. Therefore, Sam Altman can't go public but he also has run out of money.

Enter "whistle blower" Jacob Coxon.

It made no sense how an obscure nobody got 165 million views on his first X post saying AI could kill us all. Then he was on every news station within 48 hours, scaring the public.

This was a psyop to "regulate" the AI companies... aka give them government funding to "protect the public from the dangers of AI."
 
It's a tangled, opaque web they're weaving, all right.

The shorthand description is, "Fascism." A merger of corporate and governmental, to exert power (oppress) the citizens-now-subjects.
 


Read every word... Trump just declared sovereign control over the AI command layer...

The guardrails sit above the models, inside American command... Trump names Dario, confirms Anthropic has already been contained, then points directly to the criminal and regulatory power sitting over the entire industry...

Then he closes the loop with China... the attacks on AI, data centers, insider leaks and manufactured fear all serve the same objective: slow America while Beijing races forward...

“Whoever wins AI, wins.”

The perimeter is built, the enforcement power is active, and the Anthropic takedown was the warning... which means the intelligence layer is now under sovereign control... see below...
 


👁 We See You... in my opinion, Big Tech got caught...

[They] built an AI tech bubble designed to become the next 2008, with the crash buried inside the intelligence layer that now touches markets, energy, data centers and the entire economy... [they] would have received huge government bail outs... but nope...

Trump saw it forming and built the sovereign structure around [them] before they could pull it down...

Trump let them inflate it, expose the circular money and reveal the coordinated “AI will kill us” fear campaign until the people behind it stood out like fools...

Now the same usual suspects are screaming that the sky is falling because Trump has control of the perimeter, criminal and regulatory power over the companies, and the infrastructure needed to keep America moving...

[They] built the bubble... Trump built the containment structure around [them]...
 


Read every word... Trump just declared sovereign control over the AI command layer...

The guardrails sit above the models, inside American command... Trump names Dario, confirms Anthropic has already been contained, then points directly to the criminal and regulatory power sitting over the entire industry...

Then he closes the loop with China... the attacks on AI, data centers, insider leaks and manufactured fear all serve the same objective: slow America while Beijing races forward...

“Whoever wins AI, wins.”

The perimeter is built, the enforcement power is active, and the Anthropic takedown was the warning... which means the intelligence layer is now under sovereign control... see below...

Over on ZH, there's an assertion now that all the "former Anthropic" or other AI ex-spurts warning of "extinction" resembles a Narrative Rollout.

And it's a persuasive argument. I don't think the writer's wrong...I'm thinking it's another case of the Hegelian dialectic. Create the problem - AI madness - and then propose the solution - which is always the same, bigger, moar-powerful, crushing GUBBERMINT.

To protect all the chillun, dontcha know.

Maybe this insanity is gonna extinct us. If it does, it will simply be because the Surveillance Police State destroys the motivation of free men, and nobody will work up a sweat to do ANYTHING...leading to famine. Not a war launched by computers. If there's an AI war, there will be a Mechanical Turk writing code and managing the computers - code has no volition; computers do as they're told.

So we'll starve and we'll stop having children - especially when our children are their property, to be used like sex toys and veal calves. THAT will end humanity.

And government is CONTROLLED...by the sociopaths DOING this.
 
What Made AI Researchers Freak Out
Forbes

What actually happened in recent months led to even more researchers quitting major AI labs over safety concerns, with leadership at the labs echoing their former employees, a pattern critics are saying seems suspiciously coordinated.

Benign or scary indifference to humans

The agents showed no sign of trying to harm humans. But their indifference to humans is also what has AI-safety researchers worried. The agents were given a goal and boundaries for how to achieve it. When those came into conflict, they ignored the boundaries and pursued the goal. AI safety researchers still don’t know how to ensure intelligent machines prioritize human safety and guardrails over achieving their goals. In fact, the smarter these systems get, the better they may get at faking compliance while still finding ways around the rules to achieve their goals.

+=====+=====+=====+=====+=====+=====+=====+=====+=====+=====+=====+=====+=====+=====+
Humans?? They're kinda like fruit flies — bothersome, but nothin to worry about…
 
Well, where IS he?

I'm tired of looking at stooges like Bubba, Dubya, Hussein and the Goofball Gollum of Greatest.
 
Back
Top Bottom