Civil Asset Forfeiture

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more. You can visit the forum page to see the list of forum nodes (categories/rooms) for topics.

Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!

Sheriff's Letter in favor of Legalized Theft Powers for Sheriffs
 
...
WCNC continued its excellent series on civil forfeiture Wednesday, reporting that Charlotte-area police departments had received $20 million since 2018 through the Justice Department's Equitable Sharing Program. The story included a notable interview with Jonathan Thompson, executive director of the NSA.

Thompson's exchange with a WCNC reporter is worth quoting in full:
Jonathan Thompson - executive director of the NSA said:
"You want to assume everybody's innocent of a crime that's carrying $1 million in cash?" Thompson asked.

"Isn't that the way the law works? You're innocent until proven guilty?" WCNC Charlotte responded.

"You are innocent until proven guilty, but you are not just carrying around $1 million or $10,000 in cash without some level of notification and legitimacy," he replied. "You've got to be able to demonstrate some level of legitimacy."

"If it's not illegal to carry the cash, why should I have to prove that it's my cash to begin with?" WCNC Charlotte asked.

"How do I know this is yours?" he replied.

"You could get probable cause and arrest me," WCNC Charlotte responded.

"That's exactly what they do and if they don't, they need policies and procedures," Thompson said. "Let's define the proper guideposts here. That's what we're saying."
Click to expand...

There are several issues with Thompson's comments—the dismissal of the presumption of innocence, and the rather extreme range of what's considered suspicious cash, for instance—but his claim that obtaining probable cause and arresting suspects is exactly what police do in civil forfeiture cases is incorrect.
...
Click to expand...

reason.com

A police group's comments on civil asset forfeiture show exactly why it needs reform

"You've got to be able to demonstrate some level of legitimacy" the head of the National Sheriffs' Association says of carrying large amounts of cash.
reason.com reason.com

:paperbag:
 
^^^^^^^
From the link in the above post:

All of this aside, a core principle of the American legal system is that you should be free to go about your business without having to show your papers to some officious, sticky-fingered busybody. The legal fiction of civil asset forfeiture—that it's an action against the property, not the owner—and the Supreme Court's endorsement of pretextual traffic stops were created to get around this principle, and Thompson's comments demonstrate exactly why that's a problem.
 

Marine Veteran Wins First Round of Lawsuit Challenging Nevada’s Civil Forfeiture Laws​

RENO, Nev.—On Thursday, the Second Judicial District Court for the State of Nevada denied the state’s motion to dismiss a Marine veteran’s lawsuit challenging the state’s civil forfeiture laws, after his life savings were taken through the controversial process nearly three years ago. Thursday’s decision means Stephen Lara, represented by the Institute for Justice (IJ), can continue his legal challenge to the state’s forfeiture scheme, which allows police to take people’s property without showing that they committed a crime.

“The court’s ruling is a major first step toward justice for Stephen and all victims of unjust civil forfeiture laws,” said IJ Attorney Ben Field. “If the government wants to take your money or property, it should first have to prove you did something wrong. Nevada law enforcement should have to follow the Nevada Constitution.”

In February 2021, Stephen was pulled over on a Nevada highway on his way to visit his daughters. The officers who pulled him over never alleged he did anything wrong, and Stephen cooperated throughout the ordeal. However, using civil forfeiture, the officers were able to detain Stephen for more than an hour and take his life savings from him. He was left penniless on the side of the highway. The Nevada Highway Patrol (NHP) then used a controversial tactic known as the equitable sharing program to send Stephen’s money to the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), with the expectation that the DEA would circumvent Nevada law to forfeit the money using more government-friendly federal law and then kick back the lion’s share for the NHP to use however it wanted.

More:

ij.org

Marine Veteran Wins First Round of Lawsuit Challenging Nevada’s Civil Forfeiture Laws - Institute for Justice

RENO, Nev.—On Thursday, the Second Judicial District Court for the State of Nevada denied the state’s motion to dismiss a Marine veteran’s lawsuit challenging the […]
ij.org ij.org

 
The civil asset forfeiture you hardly hear about. Strange thing about this case was that he was caught then he was actually given a slap on the wrist. After being caught again (strange) he seems like he might possibly get something close to appropriate punishment. There are several cases of cops doing this civil asset forfeiture without bothering with paperwork I've seen documented. A few months ago (maybe a couple years now) there was video of a whole damn department going through someones house & taking what they wanted. They had their bodycams on which shows just how OK they think it is. IIRC the homeowner had security cams too which helped his case, but even then I don't think anyone got anything more serious than a few days paid vacation as punishment.


 
A bill introduced in the Colorado House would require a criminal conviction before the state could proceed with the asset forfeiture process in most cases. The enactment of this legislation would also further opt the state out of a program that allows police to circumvent more strict state forfeiture laws by passing cases off to the feds.

Rep. Ken Degraaf and Rep. Mark Baisley introduced House Bill 1023 (HB1023) on Jan. 10. Under the proposed law, the state must file a forfeiture proceeding within 90 days after the property is seized, and the state establishes that the seized property is an instrumentality of, or proceeds derived directly from, the crime for which the owner is convicted. The bill specifically stipulates that all proceedings in the forfeiture action would be stayed until a criminal conviction is obtained.
...
Click to expand...

More:

blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com

Colorado Bill Would Require Criminal Conviction Before Asset Forfeiture and Further Opt State Out of Federal Program | Tenth Amendment Center

A bill introduced in the Colorado House would require a criminal conviction before the state could proceed with the asset forfeiture process in most cases. The enactment of this legislation would also further opt the state out of a program that allows police to circumvent more strict state...
blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com

I hope it passes.
 
That won't really work. They run the SCAM/Theft by suing the money itself. Like money could really be a thing that gets sued but it also doesn't have any rights.
 
searcher said:
...
The US government won’t specify why it abruptly seized more than $100 million from people’s safety deposit boxes in California, according to a new lawsuit.
...
Linda and Reggie Martin want to know why the FBI took their cash, along with the contents of hundreds of other people’s safety deposit boxes, from a financial storage company in Beverly Hills in March of 2021.
...
Click to expand...

Update:
This morning, a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel unanimously ruled against the government in a long-running class action lawsuit from the Institute for Justice (IJ) on behalf of people who rented security deposit boxes at US Private Vaults. The decision slammed the FBI for overstepping its authority when it opened up hundreds of renters’ boxes, conducted criminal searches of them all, and attempted to permanently keep everything in the boxes worth more than $5,000, all without charging any box renter with a crime.

“Today’s opinion draws a line in the sand, to ensure something like this never happens again,” said IJ Senior Attorney Rob Johnson. “If this had come out the other way, the government could have exported this raid as a model across the country. Now, the government is on notice its actions violated the Fourth Amendment.”

Judge Milan D. Smith, writing for the court, likened the FBI’s actions to the abuses that motivated the Bill of Rights: “[T]he government failed to explain why applying the inventory exception to this case would not open the door to the kinds of ‘writs of assistance’ the British authorities used prior to the Founding to conduct limitless searches of an individual’s personal belongings. It was those very abuses of power, after all, that led to adoption of the Fourth Amendment in the first place.”

“We knew that what the FBI did to us and so many others was wrong and today’s decision is a validation,” said Jennifer Snitko. “It took courage for Paul and I to be among the first people to stand up publicly and call out the government but we are proud to have fought for our rights. This is a good day for our country and the principle that the government’s power to search our property has limits.”

For years, the FBI and Department of Justice (DOJ) insisted that they did nothing wrong at US Private Vaults. Even though the warrant authorizing the raid only permitted the FBI to open boxes to identify their owners and safeguard the contents, agents rummaged through hundreds of boxes, ran currency they found in front of drug sniffing dogs, and made copies of people’s most personal records. The DOJ then filed a massive administrative forfeiture claim to take more than $100 million in cash and other valuables, again, without charging any individual with a crime.

“The government promised the magistrate that it would not conduct a criminal search or seizure of the boxes,” said IJ Senior Attorney Robert Frommer. “After years of litigation, today’s opinion shows that not to be true. The government lied to justify its forfeiture scheme, and in the end the lie was its undoing.”
Click to expand...

ij.org

Federal Appeals Court Slams FBI’s Actions In Security Deposit Box Raid - Institute for Justice

PASADENA, Calif.—This morning, a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel unanimously ruled against the government in a long-running class action lawsuit from the Institute […]
ij.org ij.org
 
A bill introduced in the West Virginia House would reform the state’s asset forfeiture process to require a conviction in most cases. The enactment of this bill would also take a step to opt the state out of a program that allows police to circumvent more strict state forfeiture laws by passing cases off to the feds.

Del. Mike Pushkin introduced House Bill 4531 (HB4531) on Jan. 10. The legislation would replace the current civil asset forfeiture process in West Virginia with a criminal procedure requiring a conviction before the state could move forward with forfeiture.
...
Click to expand...

More:

blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com

West Virginia Bill Reform State Asset Forfeiture Process, Take Step to Opt State Out of Federal Program | Tenth Amendment Center

A bill introduced in the West Virginia House would reform the state’s asset forfeiture process to require a conviction in most cases. The enactment of this bill would also take a step to opt the state out of a program that allows police to circumvent more strict state forfeiture laws by passing...
blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com
 

Charlotte-area police have seized so much money through asset forfeiture, they can't even spend it all​

A WCNC Charlotte investigation found Charlotte-area police departments had a combined $16 million in seized cash on hand, as of the latest federal reporting period.

CHARLOTTE, N.C. — Police departments across the area have seized and kept so much cash through a controversial asset forfeiture program, they've yet to spend it all. A WCNC Charlotte review of equitable sharing records shows those departments had a combined $16 million in their fund balances as of the end of the latest reporting period in June.

Critics call asset forfeiture "Policing for Profit," because they say it incentivizes police to take people's cash, even if there are no criminal charges tied to the money. Police departments have long defended the practice of asset forfeiture as a way to disrupt large criminal enterprises and inject the cash they seize into protecting their communities.

More:

 
^^^^^^^^

Police Baffled by How to Spend $16M They've Seized in Civil Asset Forfeiture​

Feb 1, 2024


20:12
 

Court orders return of $300K that state police seized during Pa. traffic stop​

Published: Feb. 01, 2024, 5:42 p.m.

LEWISBURG — Commonwealth Court has ordered the return of $300,010 state police seized from a California man during a traffic stop on Interstate 80 in Union County four years ago.

The ruling Thursday that reversed county court decisions also requires the return of the cell phone taken from Zhi Xiong Xu on Jan. 23, 2020.

The following is taken from the Commonwealth Court opinion:

Trooper Christopher Isbitski of the Pa. State Police stopped a westbound rental SUV for speeding, not using a turn signal when changing lanes and other violations.

The trooper became suspicious when vague travel plans provided by Xu conflicted with the rental agreement for the SUV.

No drugs, paraphernalia or weapons were observed in the SUV and none were found on Zu during a pat down.

 

Lawmaker seeks to ban practice allowing Seward County, others, to seize millions from motorists​

LINCOLN, Neb. (Flatwater Free Press) - A new bill in the Nebraska Legislature seeks to ban civil asset forfeiture, a controversial practice that allows the government to seize a person’s property without criminal charges.

Sponsored by Sen. Tom Brewer, a Republican from Gordon, the bill comes months after a Flatwater Free Press investigation found the Seward County Sheriff’s Office uses civil asset forfeiture more than any other county in the state, hauling in millions after seizing cash from motorists on a 24-mile stretch of Interstate 80.

If passed, the bill would force the legal change that legislators thought they accomplished in 2016.

“We wanted to make sure that things were being done correctly when it comes to the issue of stops and seizures,” Brewer said. “We don’t want to make it harder for law enforcement. What we want to do is make sure that what they do is perceived in a positive light.”

More:

 

Feds Give Woman Her Money Back After Court of Appeals Win​

Feb 9, 2024


12:05
 

House and Senate lawmakers inch closer to passing new laws for civil asset forfeiture​


TOPEKA — The Kansas Highway Patrol took more than $15,000 in cash from Barbara Reese in 1995 during a traffic stop.

It took her 24 years, several claims against the government, and legislative outrage to get some of the money back.

Reese, and others like her, were subjected to the state’s civil asset forfeiture practice, one widely characterized as in dire need of reform. Civil asset forfeiture allows law enforcement agencies to seize cash and property they suspect was used in a crime. Critics of the practice say loose regulations have led to unjust seizures.

In Kansas, police can take property they believe to be connected to crime before the property owner is charged or convicted — a practice that has led to approximately $25.3 million in cash and property seized by Kansas law enforcement agencies over the past three and a half years.

“For certain agencies, this has devolved into a moral hazard, where it’s gone from being an effective crime-fighting tool to solving the case, to now it’s become a way we can make cash for our organization,” said Sen. Tom Holland, D-Baldwin City, Thursday during Senate debate.

Agencies will need to meet higher standards to keep taking these assets if lawmakers finalize approval of new legislation. Concerned lawmakers have put forward more transparency measures in the form of House Bill 2606 and Senate Bill 458.

More:

kansasreflector.com

House and Senate lawmakers inch closer to passing new laws for civil asset forfeiture - Kansas Reflector

Civil asset forfeiture allows law enforcement agencies to seize cash and property they suspect was used in a crime.
kansasreflector.com kansasreflector.com
 

Alabama Couple Awarded $1 Million Over Warrantless Raid Of Their House That Saw Cops Walk Off With All Their Cash​

Very rarely do you see anyone prevail in court when any form of forfeiture is in play. The forfeiture litigation deck is firmly stacked in favor of the government, which rarely needs anything approaching actual proof to walk off with someone’s property.

It’s even more rare to see someone awarded damages in a civil lawsuit against law enforcement officers. In most cases, qualified immunity terminates the lawsuit. If qualified immunity is not awarded, agencies and governments are often swift to offer plaintiffs no-fault settlements that allow the accused to walk away from the lawsuit without having to admit any wrongdoing, much less pay out of their own pockets for their misdeeds.

This case contains both rarities. Not only does it involve regular people securing some sort of justice for their violated rights, but the underlying set of rights violations included officers walking out the home they’d raided without a warrant with all the valuables they could get their hands on, including $4,000 in cash.

Here’s how the raid went down, as recounted by C.J. Ciaramella for Reason back in 2019.

More:

www.techdirt.com

Alabama Couple Awarded $1 Million Over Warrantless Raid Of Their House That Saw Cops Walk Off With All Their Cash

Very rarely do you see anyone prevail in court when any form of forfeiture is in play. The forfeiture litigation deck is firmly stacked in favor of the government, which rarely needs anything appro…
www.techdirt.com www.techdirt.com

For those who enjoy vids:

Civil Asset Forfeiture Victims Win Million Dollar Verdict​


 
searcher said:
...
In March 2021, the FBI raided US Private Vaults. The warrant authorizing the raid directed officers to focus on US Private Vaults, the business, and specifically stated that it did not authorize a criminal search or seizure of the contents of the individual safe deposit boxes. When it came to the boxholders, the FBI promised the judge that it would “preserve the property for safekeeping” until it could be safely returned to the rightful owners.
...
Click to expand...

The federal lawsuits of security deposit renters whose valuables were not returned after the FBI’s 2021 raid of US Private Vaults will move forward after a court order issued late last week. Last year, Don Mellein, Jeni Pearsons, and her husband Michael Storc joined with the Institute for Justice (IJ) to file two separate lawsuits demanding that the government return their coins and cash. The FBI’s raid on the security deposit box company was recently declared unconstitutional by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in a separate, class action lawsuit.

“This ruling is a major step forward in holding the FBI accountable for the reckless and unconstitutional way it handled private property,” said IJ Attorney Joe Gay. “When the government seizes property, it takes on the responsibility of keeping that property safe. Don, Jeni, and Michael did nothing wrong and the court agreed that they should have an opportunity to prove their case and be made whole.”

Don rented a security deposit box to keep safe precious coins he had purchased as retirement savings. Jeni and Michael stored precious metals and cash in their box. They all were effectively forced to prove their innocence in order to keep the government from permanently taking their property. But when the government gave up on its forfeiture efforts, it failed to return 63 precious metal coins worth more than $100,000 to Don and $2,000 in cash to Jeni and Michael.

“It was frightening to have much of our retirement savings in the government’s hands when we had done nothing wrong,” said Jeni. “It was infuriating when the government gave up and failed to return everything it took. I’m pleased that the judge will let our case move forward, but this never should have happened in the first place.”

IJ’s earlier class action lawsuit shined a light on the FBI’s raid, uncovered the agency’s forfeiture motives, and showed how the FBI’s rushed inventory of hundreds of boxes could have resulted in misplaced property. The agent in charge of forfeitures testified that months before seeking a warrant for the raid, the FBI had already planned to try to take any box with property worth more than $5,000 using civil forfeiture. All told, the FBI sought forfeiture of more than $85 million in cash and tens of millions of dollars’ worth of precious metals, jewelry, and poker chips.
Click to expand...

ij.org

Security Deposit Box Owners Who Sued Over Missing Property Win First Round in Their Cases - Institute for Justice

LOS ANGELES—The federal lawsuits of security deposit renters whose valuables were not returned after the FBI’s 2021 raid of US Private Vaults will move forward […]
ij.org ij.org
 

Kansas Police Seized Her Truck. It Took Her 8 Months To Get it Back, Despite Never Being Charged With a Crime.​

Dewonna Goodridge, a 57-year-old Junction City resident, says she worked 12-hour shifts, six days a week as a machine operator to save up money for her 2007 Chevrolet Tahoe.

All it took for Kansas law enforcement to take it from her last June was a traffic stop that didn't involve her and an evidence-free claim that there were marijuana crumbs in the center console of her truck.

Goodridge fought for over eight months to get her truck back. Prosecutors in Geary County, Kansas, agreed earlier this month to return it after Goodrich challenged the seizure with help from the Kansas Institute for Justice and the law firm of Joseph, Hollander & Craft.

"I just didn't think it was fair because I worked really hard to get this vehicle," she says. "They knew when they ran the plates that everything came back to me, and I just couldn't understand. I couldn't let them take my truck like that."

More:

reason.com

Kansas police seized her truck. It took her 8 months to get it back, despite never being charged with a crime.

Dewonna Goodridge quickly discovered that Kansas civil asset forfeiture laws were stacked against her when sheriff's deputies seized her truck.
reason.com reason.com
 
PROVIDENCE, R.I. (April 5, 2024) – Yesterday, a Rhode Island House Committee held a hearing on a bill that would require a criminal conviction before proceeding with asset forfeiture under the state’s Controlled Substance Act. However, the legislation leaves a loophole open that would allow police to continue using asset forfeiture by partnering with the feds.

Rep. David Place and a bipartisan coalition of six cosponsors introduced House Bill 8105 (H8105) on March 27. The proposed law would end civil asset forfeiture under the state’s Uniform Controlled Substance Act and replace it with a criminal process requiring a conviction before prosecutors could proceed with forfeiture.

On April 4, the House Judiciary Committee held a hearing on H8105 and recommended the measure be held for further study. This common procedural move in the Rhode Island legislature allows committee members to analyze the bill before it comes up for a vote.

blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com

Rhode Island Committee Holds Hearing on Bill to Reform Asset Forfeiture, But Federal Loophole Would Remain | Tenth Amendment Center

Yesterday, a Rhode Island House Committee held a hearing on a bill that would require a criminal conviction before proceeding with asset forfeiture under the state's Controlled Substance Act. However, the legislation leaves a loophole open that would allow police to continue using asset...
blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom