Civil Asset Forfeiture

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.

Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!

 

Update.

Prosecutor Denied Immunity By Court Of Appeals​

Jun 11, 2025
Another win by the Institute for Justice.
https://ij.org/


10:07
 
More on Rolling Thunder..........

Pit Stop Policing Transforms Traffic Violations Into High-Stakes Drug Hunts​

This is part five of Operation Shakedown, a series about heavy-handed traffic enforcement tactics and property seizures in Spartanburg County, South Carolina. Click here to read part one.

When officers stopped a Greyhound bus for going 5 mph over the speed limit on Interstate 85 in Spartanburg County, South Carolina, they were not interested in traffic enforcement.

The real target was drugs and cash, which the police pursued with factory-like precision. NASCAR pit crews could learn something about speed and efficiency from these experts.

More:


Update

 
INDIANAPOLIS—Henry and Minh Cheng have crisscrossed the country selling jewelry to small businesses for three decades. They have never done business in Indiana. Yet today they are fighting in Indiana state court to get back more than $42,000 seized from their company’s parcel that was routed through the FedEx shipping hub in Indianapolis.


Update

 
August 4, 2023

NEW YORK—Today, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals held that a Rochester woman is entitled to make her case in front of a judge nearly three years after Rochester Police took more than $8,000 from her without charging her with a crime.

Cristal Starling previously lost her $8,000 when—representing herself in her civil forfeiture case—she missed one of several deadlines to contest the forfeiture. Cristal appealed, represented by the Institute for Justice (IJ), and the 2nd Circuit held that Cristal should not lose her money forever because of a single missed deadline.

“Today’s decision will have important consequences for civil forfeiture victims who are trying to navigate complicated forfeiture procedures, often without help from a lawyer,” said IJ Senior Attorney Rob Johnson. “If the government wants to take your money, they should have to prove you did something wrong—not trip you up with legal procedures.”


Update

 
IDK if you'd call this civil asset forfeiture or not, but didn't know where else to put it. Especially since they aren't using them for dept. and/or personal use, auctioning off for money, I'm OK with these shit bags cars trashed, especially when they have enough video evidence to prove it. I would say it would be even better if they let the fire dept destroy them for training, opening vehicles with jaws of life, chop saws. etc.

.





.
 

He Beat the DEA After Agents Wrongly Took His Money at Atlanta Airport, But a Court Let the Government Stiff His Attorneys​

July 20, 2023

ATLANTA—Beating federal prosecutors in court is no easy task. But Brian Moore’s attorneys did just that when they helped him stop the civil forfeiture of $8,500 seized from him by Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) agents at Atlanta’s airport. Brian was never charged with a crime, and the government willingly dismissed the case and cannot file it again.

By federal law, property owners are supposed to have their attorneys’ fees paid by the government when they beat civil forfeiture. But a federal court determined that because the government gave up, Brian did not “substantially prevail” and will not be reimbursed for the cost of litigating his case. Now, the Institute for Justice (IJ) is stepping in with an appeal to the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to help Brian win his attorneys’ fees and, more broadly, to ensure that fighting civil forfeiture does not mean losing much of what was wrongly seized in the first place.

“The government should face consequences when it files meritless civil forfeiture cases,” said IJ Attorney Joshua House. “By any definition, Brian won his case, and it is clear that Congress wanted the government to pay attorneys’ fees to property owners in these circumstances, so that victims of forfeiture abuse are made whole.”

More here:


Update

 

He Beat the DEA After Agents Wrongly Took His Money at Atlanta Airport, But a Court Let the Government Stiff His Attorneys​

July 20, 2023

ATLANTA—Beating federal prosecutors in court is no easy task. But Brian Moore’s attorneys did just that when they helped him stop the civil forfeiture of $8,500 seized from him by Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) agents at Atlanta’s airport. Brian was never charged with a crime, and the government willingly dismissed the case and cannot file it again.

By federal law, property owners are supposed to have their attorneys’ fees paid by the government when they beat civil forfeiture. But a federal court determined that because the government gave up, Brian did not “substantially prevail” and will not be reimbursed for the cost of litigating his case. Now, the Institute for Justice (IJ) is stepping in with an appeal to the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to help Brian win his attorneys’ fees and, more broadly, to ensure that fighting civil forfeiture does not mean losing much of what was wrongly seized in the first place.

“The government should face consequences when it files meritless civil forfeiture cases,” said IJ Attorney Joshua House. “By any definition, Brian won his case, and it is clear that Congress wanted the government to pay attorneys’ fees to property owners in these circumstances, so that victims of forfeiture abuse are made whole.”

More here:


More:

 

Civil Asset Forfeiture Victim WINS!​


Sep 1, 2025
Another big win for the IJ, where a man had his money seized by federal agents who then dismissed their claims; they fought him on paying his court costs and fees and an appeals court ordered the government to pay up.
https://ij.org/


12:31
 
Back
Top Bottom