Civil Asset Forfeiture

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.

Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!

 

Update.

Prosecutor Denied Immunity By Court Of Appeals​

Jun 11, 2025
Another win by the Institute for Justice.
https://ij.org/

10:07
 

Update

 

Update

 

Update

 
IDK if you'd call this civil asset forfeiture or not, but didn't know where else to put it. Especially since they aren't using them for dept. and/or personal use, auctioning off for money, I'm OK with these shit bags cars trashed, especially when they have enough video evidence to prove it. I would say it would be even better if they let the fire dept destroy them for training, opening vehicles with jaws of life, chop saws. etc.

.




.
 

Update

 

More:

 

Civil Asset Forfeiture Victim WINS!​


Sep 1, 2025
Another big win for the IJ, where a man had his money seized by federal agents who then dismissed their claims; they fought him on paying his court costs and fees and an appeals court ordered the government to pay up.
https://ij.org/

12:31
 

How the DEA Stole $100k From Pro Gamblers​

Sep 17, 2025
Professional gambler Gina Fiore shares the shocking story of how the DEA seized $100,000 of her gambling winnings, the legal battle that followed, and how it became the landmark Supreme Court case Walden v. Fiore, now taught in law schools as a key precedent on jurisdiction and civil forfeiture.

6:16

0:00 The $100,000 Seizure
1:13 Proving It Was Gambling Money
3:00 Walden v. Fiore at the Supreme Court
5:00 Civil Forfeiture and Lessons Learned
 

More

Case info: https://ij.org/press-release/alaska-p...

Plane Seized Over Six-Pack of Budweiser. Seriously.​

Sep 18, 2025 Beyond the Brief
Can the government take a $95,000 plane because a passenger used it to transport a six pack of Budweiser? The Alaska Supreme Court says yes, but the U.S. Constitution says no.
Today we chat with IJ attorneys Sam Gedge and Kirby West to discuss an outrageous new case from the Last Frontier and how forfeiture interacts with excessive fines, free speech, and more.

28:02
 

Update

 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…