Welcome to the PMBug forums - a community supported watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.
Register a free account to join the discussions. When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including access to market data/charts and additional members only rooms (including one for trade/barter with the community).
Let us not forget it was the Dems who started that shit with all their false allegations against Trump.The Reagan-Mondale era of bipartisan Congressional deliberation is long dead. We're in the party polarization toilet swirl now.
Let us not forget it was the Dems who started that shit with all their false allegations against Trump.
...
Yes, I would agree that it got started around that time, although it's always been there to varying degrees. (things getting nastier in politics)I'm not a fan of party rah rah BS, but to my recollection, the polarization swirl really started kicking into gear back in the Clinton years. The pendulum has swung back and forth and gotten increasingly stronger ever since.
"All yo great gran-chillin gonna be brown"
I have no control over the hellscape that the Social Engineers create - deliberately or intentionally.
Ah, Casey, and his apocalyptical viewpoint.
Sadly enough, he's prolly correct.
It wasn't even close to the piling on they gave and still try to give Trump. I don't recall W and all his supporters being labeled an existential threat to the nation during the campaign, let alone for a whole decade afterwards.Media/Dems were literally saying the same shit about W being Hitler (Iraq war rhetoric) leading up to Obama's election. The pendulum is swinging harder now, but it isn't about Trump. He just happens to be playing the Republican leader role right now.
Speaking of this, there was word prior to the debate that the plan was to put him out there with the intent that he WOULD bomb so that the party could replace him without having to admit the truth of having covered up his declining mental condition.
That's why at a time when his public activities were limited to earlier in the day, they (dnc and his campaign people) agreed to such a late start time for the debate.
It's widely known that dementia patients tend to be less cognitively aware later in the day.
Ie: they didn't want to admit they had been covering up his mental decline.
.....and still don't. Hence all the lies at the time about being surprised by his performance, and now this stroke BS they want us to believe.
Clinton might be considered right wing now by his party.I'm not a fan of party rah rah BS, but to my recollection, the polarization swirl really started kicking into gear back in the Clinton years. The pendulum has swung back and forth and gotten increasingly stronger ever since.
Nah that's a wet fart.Honestly, I thought at the time and still think that the dems didn't shoot him up with "juice" before the debate like they did for his State of the Union speech. I think they deliberately let him go up there in full potato mode because they realized he couldn't go another 4 years. During the debate his pupils weren't the size of dimes like they were for the SOTU.
View attachment 19579
To expand a bit on this, there were in fact reasons TO investigate W.When Obozo got in, did he make speechs demonizing W and the republican party? Did we see years of legal witch hunts against W? Did they try to throw him in jail for the rest of his life?
No, they didn't. Why? Because W was a rino.
That's possible too.Honestly, I thought at the time and still think that the dems didn't shoot him up with "juice" before the debate like they did for his State of the Union speech. I think they deliberately let him go up there in full potato mode because they realized he couldn't go another 4 years. During the debate his pupils weren't the size of dimes like they were for the SOTU.
If you were to get a time machine and go get the 1996 Bill Clinton and bring him to today, the democrat party would disown him.Clinton might be considered right wing now by his party.
That's the thing right there. WTF is it about Dem strongholds that make them incapable of counting votes in reasonable and timely manner?When the investigation in Fulton County, Maricopa County, and California all show the SAME pattern
Left wing Democrats won, interesting...Nothing special. Just something to peruse if interested.
Goldman, Espaillat lose New York primaries to Mamdani-backed challengers
Two House Democrats from New York City lost their reelection bids Tuesday to challengers backed by New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, a sign that the 34-year-old’s political capital remains high six months into his term. In the 10th District, based in Lower Manhattan and western Brooklyn, Brad...rollcall.com
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?