Elections

Welcome to the Precious Metals Bug Forums

Welcome to the PMBug forums - a watering hole for folks interested in gold, silver, precious metals, sound money, investing, market and economic news, central bank monetary policies, politics and more.

Why not register an account and join the discussions? When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no Google ads, market data/charts, access to trade/barter with the community and much more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!



10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried Today

#10 - Idaho health board becomes the first to REMOVE Covid-19 vaccines from their clinics.

“These products are unsafe, and we do not promote them.”

After a stunning 4-to-3 vote, Idaho’s Southwest District Health bravely decided to pull the COVID shots from 30 locations where it provides healthcare services.

By doing so, they’ve become “the first health agency in America to do that,” Laura Demaray, a Southwest Idaho nurse, told @ChildrensHD.

The board came to this decision after a group of presentations from hero doctors like Peter McCullough, Ryan Cole, James Thorp, and more convinced them that the shots are “not safe for human use.”

This is a historic decision because it leads the way for more clinics to follow suit and stop offering dangerous COVID shots to unsuspecting patients who still “trust the Science™.”

In a striking statement, Dr. John Tribble, the board’s only physician, said: “This experiment with mRNA gene therapy during COVID-19 will be shown to be one of the most egregious examples of democide in world history.”

(See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)

threadreaderapp.com

Thread by @VigilantFox on Thread Reader App

@VigilantFox: 10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried Today #10 - Idaho health board becomes the first to REMOVE Covid-19 vaccines from their clinics. “These products are unsafe, and we do not promote them.” After a st...…
threadreaderapp.com threadreaderapp.com
 
Viking said:
So Kamala is losing?
Click to expand...
No way. The only way to top putting a dementia patient, who never left his basement, in office is to put his VP in office to fill his space. She can't put 2 sentences together and is the most unpopular politician of all time. In the 2020 primaries she couldn't get 1 vote. What better candidate to run right?
 
I posted this in another forum (where Aussies congregate) and thought I'd share it here too with respect to election outcome's effect on precious metals:
I think there will likely be a short lived reaction (high volatility) that reverts to the mean in a week or so (no matter who wins).

I think that the two assholes do have some substantive differences in foreign policy, fiscal policy and monetary policy that could effect domestic markets, international trade and the plans of foreign nations/central banks. Trump is talking a big game about cutting domestic spending with Elon Musk in a cabinet role (and possible bringing in Ron Paul to assist!), but it remains to be seen how serious the rhetoric is. Cutting spending is really the only issue that matters with respect to monetary inflation. If Trump wins and succeeds, US might get some Milei style austerity that will hurt the domestic economy short term, but be healthy long term (and thus limit the upside for PMs). If Kamala wins, spending is likely to run unchecked which will be great for PMs until the system craters and then things won't be so great for anyone. $.02
Click to expand...
 
MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on Donald Trump’s most deranged speech yet in Wisconsin.


13:32
 
A Kamala win makes this the last election. By the time the next election rolls around all the illegals will be able to vote (If they aren't already) and it will just be a massive blue wave.
Martin may be right. The country could split up.
 
Saw this on Facebook. Makes you wonder how widespread this is and why election officials/pollworkers are allowing this to happen. It's my understanding that this a blatant violation of election law.

1730556518700.png
 
That's pretty tame as far as electioneering goes. Still needs to be resolved of course, but I doubt it affects anyone's votes.
 
pmbug said:
That's pretty tame as far as electioneering goes. Still needs to be resolved of course, but I doubt it affects anyone's votes.
Click to expand...

True but can you imagine the outrage that would come from the left if Trump materials were present?
 
CopperSilverGold said:
True but can you imagine the outrage that would come from the left if Trump materials were present?
Click to expand...

It sort of happened already, but it was the MAGA voter that got violent when the Dem poll worker tried to address the electioneering:
A fight erupted at an early voting location in South Carolina when a supporter of former President Donald Trump refused to take off their "Make America Great Again" hat.

The incident saw the Trump supporter fight with poll workers who asked him to take off the hat in Orangeburg County, in line with state rules restricting the portrayal of campaign promotions within polling stations.

In clips of the altercation that quickly went viral on social media, the disgruntled voter can be heard calling a poll worker who explained the rule to him a "f****** b****", before gesturing to his cap and saying, "this is my m******** right, right here."

The voter then took off his cap and threw it out of the voting area, before tapping one of the poll workers on the head, prompting them to slap him in return.

The conflict escalated as the voter began following the worker around the room, with other staff intervening to separate the two people. The voter was then escorted out of the building.
...
Click to expand...

www.newsweek.com

Trump supporter clashes with poll worker over MAGA hat dispute

A voter got into a fight with a poll worker in South Carolina after he refused to take off his MAGA hat in line with precinct regulations.
www.newsweek.com www.newsweek.com
 
pmbug said:
It sort of happened already, but it was the MAGA voter that got violent when the Dem poll worker tried to address the electioneering:

www.newsweek.com

Trump supporter clashes with poll worker over MAGA hat dispute

A voter got into a fight with a poll worker in South Carolina after he refused to take off his MAGA hat in line with precinct regulations.
www.newsweek.com www.newsweek.com
Click to expand...

Sort of but not apples to apples. The Wisconsin example is where material is exposed to every voter that walks into that voting location versus the South Carolina incident being a few minutes of exposure. And do you honestly think the Harris-Walz material is only located at one location in a smallish town in Wisconsin? It wouldn't surprise me one bit if it was done on a larger basis.
 
I have always been negative to early voting ...but our state MO is allowing early voting this year....i have observed some things that have softened my negative views on early voting..

#1 more elderly participation in the voting process
#2 overall more participation in the voting process

interestingly enough in my county ~40k residents...... ~20k registered voters.......~ 17k voted in 2020 presdential election.......this year as of last Thurday 3600 early votes had been cast or about 20% with several high volume days to go

we have several statewide ballot issues such as abortion etc on the ballot i am glad to see heavy voting vs light voting driven by special intrest people
 
As long as there is transparency and integrity with the chain of custody for the votes, early voting kicks ass. Minimal lines and folks who have difficult work situations have more flexibility to find a window.
 
We have all heard that there are a number of blue states that require no ID to vote so why dont republicans go in and vote over and over again at every local town?
 
I just got to the part where he talks about the border and immigration. Lying his ass off.
 
1730601275793.png

Did you know that the "Electoral Count Reform and Presidential Transition Improvement Act of 2022" created a pathway for an "aggrieved candidate for President" to challenge election results? This pathway was not "available" in 2020.

- It created a 3-judge panel to hear actions brought by the aggrieved candidate.
- Provides an expedited procedure throughout
- Allows for Appeals to be taken up directly to the supreme court

Is this how Trump could win in a landslide and still expose election fraud? Is this how he could beat the cheat?

Chris Paul, @pgunnels1 and I will discuss on tonight's show at 10:30 PM ET




 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom